Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Do you use desktop icons?
Yes
9
27.27%
No.
24
72.73%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll
I ask this because I do not and I wonder if I'm alone in the world.
I stopped using icons under Windows XP before my Linux days. I like pretty pictures for my wallpaper (I lean toward shots of scenery) and icons cover up my pretty pictures.
Not for me..
XFCE with xfdesktop disabled... Using them becomes a pain when 99% of the time i have windows sprawled across the 3 screens, and 3 sides of my desktop cube (i like to leave one empty so i can have a quick perv when im swapping desktops/workspaces ).
For what its worth, the desktop that my screens sit on is just as disorganised
does the activities overlay count as desktop icons? does the plasma launch screen count? How is it any different then executing a "show desktop" command?
I would say 'no' but I use gnome-shell... so 'maybe'
I don't use them because it's really inconvenient to have to hide all your windows to get to them. It's much easier to use a menu or keyboard shortcut to launch stuff.
@MTK358
In that respect, gnome-shell doesn't count.
Alt+F1 - overylay
Start typing anything related to what you want: e.g. documents, music, graphics, gimp, system
Press Enter when your selection comes up (generally within three letters)
Kind of like a visual run prompt... Assuming you have the right key words in the "comments" parameter of a .desktop file in ~/.local/share/applications or /usr/share/applications. If you don't have a .desktop file, there is still Alt+F2 for the run prompt.
No, I do not. They always clutter the desktop and get in the way of the wallpaper. The fluxbox right-click menu is easy enough to access, so I don't need them.
Desktop icons don't make sense when using a tiling WM. To start the most used apps I use keyboard shortcuts, for everything else a terminal or the menu of wmii.
24 hours later, I must say I find it notable that Nos are winning. Given all the agony in the forums about icons and stuff, I must admit that I am most pleasantly taken aback.
One reason I have become a Fluxbox aficionado is that Flux doesn't do desktop icons, at least not without an add-on (I think it's called fbdesk).
I use keybindings* for my frequently-used applications and the menu for others. Sometimes I even start an application from the terminal because it can be easier or quicker for what I'm doing right then.
I have looked a few tiling window managers, but they've never grabbed me.
_________________
*Thanks to one of klaatu's podcasts for opening the wonderful world of Fluxbox keybindings to me.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.