Linux - DistributionsThis forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on...
Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
no i meant to one in the kernel, not the lilo screen.. but...
ok, updated lilo and the layout of the files has changed about and no i get a really mesy text boot menu thing instead, and i don't know really what to change by lilo.conf to to get something not covered in ascii junk... if anyone has installed it from scratch, could i get a copy of your lilo.conf, cheers.
Also there's a Bootsplash package too, which is a package for making your own lilo boot screens from jpgs, which is quite nice, even thought the two that come with it are hideous...
hmm, and another thing, the kernel "quiet" flag set in lilo.conf get's used too much, and mandrake made it supress all the outputs from each thingy in the init.d files. so there's bugger all feedback... ahh well, just get rid of quiet.
hmm it seems to have more problems than the 8.2b1...
my usb optical mouse will not respond on a warm boot about half the time.
the root login warning message will not go away the next time after i unchecked it.
my icons would constantly be moved down, and not in saved positions.
i could not log in to my default user, i'd just be sent back to the login screen.
the mandrake software manager will fail to load often, so it renders the luxury ease of use quite worthless.
the terminal fux0rs, it says everything is an invalid command.
solutions would become rebooting a slow os, over and over. even disabling some services didn't improve the boot speed much.
i really wanted an alternative to win2k, but i guess why switch when everything is fine already. i don't think i could leave office, adobe, all my games, and the greater library of p2p software..... ever.
my original interest in linux was due to a faulty mobo that i thought was win2k's problem. it'd cause a random reboot every 5 min to 6-8 hrs.
cos u r all talking baout d/l the 8.2 in 2 and 3 hours only
but me
poor me
i am online using dial up modem
and i am d/l the 8.2 first cd in 40 hours
and i have 2 others friend doing the same with the other 2 cds
i think we need a prize for our effort
the reason I am "buying''' 8.2 is it is only $5.95 for the 3 cd's at linux central. on a slow dial up I want to be able to use all the speed and bandwidth I can get just to surf.
I d/l and installed the 8.2............................................................maybe it is just me, but I seem to like 8.1 a little more.
For instance I went to terminal and tried to "hdparm -t /dev/hda" to see how fast I was pulling info from the HD.....................got an unknown command error. Same thing that I got when I tried it in RH7.2
i think that 8.2 has more decent stuff on it, i think that the 3rd cd basically has more appealing junk than 8.1 did. as for hdparm, well that's definitely on there, it's ALWAYS there, not the kinda thing you'd not put in a distro. check it's installed and on your path
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.