LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Password
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2003, 11:02 AM   #16
markus1982
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Stuttgart (Germany)
Distribution: Debian/GNU Linux
Posts: 1,467

Rep: Reputation: 46

Recently switched a heavy-load production server from RedHat to Debian and well I like to outline that the boot up is 30% faster than the RedHat bootup was.

Also the packages installed were almost just right ... except for openssl, etc which had to be installed and ipchains which was still installed although I've chosen bf24 and installed Kernel 2.4.18 ... anyways, Debian rules :-)
 
Old 02-08-2003, 12:06 PM   #17
Nu-Bee
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Distribution: Mandrake 9.2
Posts: 269

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by wartstew
Yes, this is a good example of why I think the Debian installer is rough. You probably could use Shift-PageUp to scroll back, but you would have to know that in advance.

Maybe Xandros is for you? It's commercial, so you have to buy it, but you get a lot of value-added non free software with it like "Crossover Office". It's been getting some good reviews. Since it *is* Debian, you can just "apt-get" any additions or upgrades from there for free. Not a bad combination.
Actually I like Mandrake pretty well; especially since I learned how to compile the kernel and can remove a lot of the extra bloat. With kernel 2.4.19-24 SuperMount is fixed and it screams through the /mnt directory now.

I am playing with Vector Linux, and Peanut Linux on my P120/32M and it is going a lot better...Debian was the pits.

I'll try Debian again on my 900Mhz Athlon in a virtual machine, and see how it goes.
 
Old 02-09-2003, 03:27 PM   #18
wartstew
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, Debian, Maemo
Posts: 464

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by Nu-Bee
I am playing with Vector Linux, and Peanut Linux on my P120/32M and it is going a lot better...Debian was the pits.
Vector and Peanut are based on Slackware, I liked them so much that I switched over to Slackware proper to get a "complete" distribution. Then I like Slackware so much that I haven't switched to anything else yet (although I've been attempting to learn Debian, as I've previously noted).

PS: I wouldn't attempt to use KDE on the P120, do either Peanut's Enlighenment or Vector's IceWM (or what ever else they have now: Xfce?) instead.
 
Old 02-09-2003, 05:16 PM   #19
Flibble
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Distribution: Redhat 9.0, Debian, Knoppix, YellowDog
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 15
Curious why your knoppix experience wasn't a good one. Which Knoppix CD did you burn from?

My recommendation is to:

(a) Get the latest Knoppix CD.
(b) Get the latest knx-install (i.e. not the one on the above CD)
(c) Boot to Knoppix and run the new knx-install (from floppy, FAT partition, etc)

apt-get update

and away you go.

I had a fully fledged up to date Debian ready to rock in 15 minutes. That was after hours spent trudging through dselect etc.

One thing to bear in mind is that all the great hardware detection stuff gets missed in the HD install, _all_ you get is a Debian install. You can retro fit some of the cool Knoppix hardware detection stuff.

Go to http://www.knoppix.net , register yourself a username and then visit the HDD Install Forum on the site. Lots of helpful people willing to resolve any problems you might have.

Links to latest Knoppix CD and latest knx-install are on the front page of http://www.knoppix.net

Flibble
 
Old 02-09-2003, 05:19 PM   #20
Flibble
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Distribution: Redhat 9.0, Debian, Knoppix, YellowDog
Posts: 142

Rep: Reputation: 15
BTW, eadz (the sysadmin of http://www.knoppix.net) has remastered Knoppix with KDE 3.1

You get a full distro that boots from CD with all the latest eye candy. Nice. ;>

Flibble
 
Old 02-09-2003, 06:59 PM   #21
wartstew
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, Debian, Maemo
Posts: 464

Rep: Reputation: 30
Yea, I think Knoppix is pretty cool too, a preconfigured Debian live CD that you can then clone to a disk. The compressed file system makes it quite fast for something running completely from a CD. (Virtual Linux which is Mandrake based, is the same basic idea and is pretty good too)


Last edited by wartstew; 02-09-2003 at 07:19 PM.
 
Old 02-09-2003, 07:42 PM   #22
wartstew
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, Debian, Maemo
Posts: 464

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by aliensub
I wanted evolution. I installed the slack package for it, only to realize that non of the dependencies was installed, i wasn't even getting told they where missing before i tried to start evolution, and 1.000.000+ dependencies where missing. It's probably just me being to used to apt-get.
Yes, I agree this is the #1 weakness of Slackware. This is why I am trying to learn Debian so that I can generate highly customized Linux installations and have everything work. With Slack you mostly need to install the whole distribution and live with what you get (which I feel is usually pretty good), otherwise prepare to fight dependency wars. The funny thing is that several times now I've fought those wars and won in less time than I spent trying to figure out a messed up RPM based distribution that refused to install something be cause it wrongfully thought it was already installed. I guess I just need to use "RPM -i --force" more often.

Quote:
Also I had a hard time finding various conf file, but as far as i understand Debian is more away from the standards than slack (that as far as i understand try to keep things the unix way).
Yea, Slackware is non-standard about this, but simple about it too. They've reduced the amount of config files to a minimum, then emulate SysV somewhat just to get by. It wouldn't break my heart if they decided to comply with the Linux Standards Base (even with RPM!).

Quote:
I think Slack is a great alternative in linux, I am just not getting along with it.
At the expense of being very confusing to others, this is one of the great things about the Linux OS world. With MicroSoft (not the toilet paper company), you don't have any choice with Windows, (other than old Windows), you just have to live with it. With Linux, if there is something you don't like: try a different distribution.
 
Old 02-11-2003, 05:33 AM   #23
KayJay
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: dev/null
Distribution: redhat, mandrake
Posts: 218

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by etherdeath
I've been using Mandrake for the last year or so, and just had had it with Mandrake Update. The last time I used it, it would show 2 of every package that I could Upgrade, when I was doing security Upgrades. Each one had the same discription and everything, except the file sizes were different. Plus, I've had it crash or tell me nothing more than 'install failed'.
why not use urpmi then? u can use it on the commandline.
urpmi.update -a
urpmi package

that's it..
why updating with the gui ?
 
Old 02-11-2003, 08:26 AM   #24
etherdeath
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: New York City
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
I didn't try urpmi, but I tried rpm, and was able to see some errors. Errors that I didn't know how to fix. I like updating with a GUI so I can see a list of what I need to update. A lot of times I would do a "rpm -i package" and not get any errors or any indication of anything, and the package was not installed.
 
Old 02-11-2003, 08:30 AM   #25
wartstew
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu, Debian, Maemo
Posts: 464

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by KayJay
why not use urpmi then? u can use it on the commandline.
urpmi.update -a
urpmi package
Does that actually work any better? I figured it was the RPM database that was getting messed up and causing the problem. I've had problems like this with the command line RPM with RH and Mandrake. The "RPM --rebuilddb" seems to help.
 
Old 02-11-2003, 08:43 AM   #26
etherdeath
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: New York City
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
I tried rebuilding too.. that did help to some degree. I think the root of the problem was that I was trying to install the latest packages without having the latest gcc. I may end up having just as many problems with debian when and if I try the same thing.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good debian repositories NNP Debian 11 10-18-2007 02:23 AM
Good firewall for Debian 3.0r1 apache363 Linux - Software 4 09-11-2007 09:15 PM
good dial up modem for debian? microsoft/linux Debian 4 03-14-2005 01:35 PM
Gentoo is good, but its no debian cadj Linux - General 64 03-09-2005 11:36 PM
What are good FTP servers for Debian? Erik Plaggenmar Linux - Software 2 05-31-2004 09:13 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration