Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions
User Name
Linux - Distributions This forum is for Distribution specific questions.
Red Hat, Slackware, Debian, Novell, LFS, Mandriva, Ubuntu, Fedora - the list goes on and on... Note: An (*) indicates there is no official participation from that distribution here at LQ.


  Search this Thread
Old 10-02-2004, 03:10 PM   #1
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 248

Rep: Reputation: 30
Distro For a Intermediate Linux User

Ok this is the thing.. I like debians apt-get.. Id use debian but the boot is so crappy.. Plus i dont really like debconf it doesnt always work... Secondly id use slack but it doesnt even come with a package manager like apt-get swaret etc.. Id also use gentoo but i will NOT compile every package.. I also wont use debian or slackware because i want it to be i686.. What id like in a distro is:

Package manger (apt-get)
No dependency hell
i686 based
Non newb distro that does everything graphical.
Has actual packages like .deb .tgz .rpm not source like gentoo
Updated frequently..
Installable to the hard drive
Package updates constantly
And thats off the top of my head.. Thanks..
Old 10-02-2004, 03:18 PM   #2
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 19,192
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470Reputation: 470
Slack has pkgtool (so you'd run installpkg <packagename>.tgz). Swaret or Slapt-Get is easily installed.
Old 10-02-2004, 03:20 PM   #3
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 248

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I know ive already used debian slackware gentoo and arch linux.. Id like slack but i mean everything is for i486..
Old 10-03-2004, 01:15 AM   #4
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: Slack-where?
Posts: 654

Rep: Reputation: 30
you mean, everything can run on i486.

Slack is still optimized for i686.
Old 10-03-2004, 04:43 AM   #5
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Finland
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 235

Rep: Reputation: 30
the i686 vs i686+compatibility on i386 etc thing is getting old I mean, who can actually claim to notice a difference? Once you turn off unneeded services and compile a custom kernel, the end result feels 99% the same. I'm using gentoo (with fairly agressive CFLAGS) and I honestly can't notice any major (if any) speed difference except for booting compared to Debian Sid.
Old 10-03-2004, 08:06 AM   #6
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Florida
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 248

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I didnt know that slack was optimized for i686..
Old 10-04-2004, 08:30 AM   #7
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: SFBayArea, CA
Distribution: Debian-based, Slackware 10x+
Posts: 150

Rep: Reputation: 15
FYI, four other Slackware-based distros of note which actually have completely separate LQ forums are, in forum-listed order,
1) VectorLinux
2) CollegeLinux
3) Amigo [Linux]
4) Buffalo [Linux]

From these LQ forums and from these distro's websites :

- Amigo seems the most minimalist in its specific design for low memory (e.g., 16MB) and low hd space (e.g., 200MB) Based upon this, Amigo could be a good choice for actual x486 systems
compared to the full Slackware distro.

- OTOH, maybe VectorLinux would be just as appropriate for older x486 systems. As the Distrowatch VectorLinux review writes
"the small size and memory requirements of the operating system can be deployed on older machines maybe long forgotten."

- Buffalo may be more high-end compared to the previous two Slackware-based distros, in that its enhancements over VectorLinux are described as being targeted at the small business workstation market . It therefore would seem to be the better Slackware-based distro choice at small business x686 machines with extra memory and hard disk space requirements.

(Not certain about CollegeLinux myself; check out its forum or website for further info)

Old 10-05-2004, 09:06 AM   #8
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Valhalla
Distribution: Slackware-current, kernel 2.6.31
Posts: 284

Rep: Reputation: 35
The selection of a distribution shouldn't depend on the optimization. It's hard to see a difference between an optimized and unoptimized packages. It's just the enthusiasm that makes the difference in most cases. The GCC doesn't do significant optimizations in my opinion


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
User experience in installing a Linux distro impeteperry LQ Suggestions & Feedback 2 11-10-2005 06:08 PM
The Easiest Linux Distro For New User davethegenius Linux - Software 10 12-12-2004 08:46 AM
Intermediate Linux user looking to settle on non buggy desktop distro thebeast Linux - Distributions 31 10-08-2004 02:55 PM
Brand New to Linux, intermediate Programmer, want to program for linux destop apps albertrosa Programming 4 12-08-2003 07:49 AM
Best distro for a home user and new to linux? Ekim Gram Linux - Newbie 37 05-23-2003 09:46 PM > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration