Linux - CertificationThis forum is for the discussion of all topics relating to Linux certification.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hey folks, what's the purpose of a "certification" anyway? "Just to win one, even by cheating?" Hardly.
You're not doing this "to pass a test!" You are doing it to .
The purpose -- and you can decide for yourself if they actually achieve their purpose or not -- is to help you learn the material, and then ("oh by the way") to objectively demonstrate to others that you apparently have done so.
One might argue successfully that it is the study-materials themselves that are useful, and that the examination itself is an afterthought. What they present to you is a well-defined and concise goal, and a highly-structured, very specific "pathway through the woods" that you can follow to get there. Some people find it very difficult to learn abstract technical subjects without such a trail of breadcrumbs; they are not good at "self teaching." Others are very good at that, and have little or no use for certifications.
But "cheating," in any case, is simply self-defeating. When you're finished, either you know your stuff and can do it ... or you have wasted your time.
Last edited by sundialsvcs; 11-09-2005 at 04:49 PM.
Exams, in any subjest, is a way to prove to others that you have read and understood the course. Braindumps and so on are a part of the reason why the MCSE was devalued. If you can pass an exam by simply memorising a few questions and not actually putting in the work to pass the course, the exam is useless.
And you have wasted your time because you will be found out as soon as you start work.
I must be out of the loop because I didn't even know that those brain dump sites existed.
I got my LPIC level 1 finished about a month ago.
What I used: O'reilly LPIC in a nutshell (out of date), LPIC exam cram 2, and (of course) using linux fulltime on the desktop for the past several years
Originally posted by nouse66 I must be out of the loop because I didn't even know that those brain dump sites existed.
I got my LPIC level 1 finished about a month ago.
What I used: O'reilly LPIC in a nutshell (out of date), LPIC exam cram 2, and (of course) using linux fulltime on the desktop for the past several years
Listen to nouse66 - this is how to do it: research and actually using the system.
The purpose of certification is to learn? That hardly seems likely. The only reason I've ever considered certification is to enhance my resume. You don't need to pay someone money to test you in order to learn do you?
Truthfully though I've been a professioanl Systems Administrator for over 14 years now and have yet to bother with getting certification for any of the diverse systems I've worked on. I HAVE however gone to training whenever it was available. This stuff evolves and the challenges I faced as a SysAdm 10 years ago are completely different than the ones I face now.
Certification in my view is just a way to get your foot in the door for the interview. Since most companies have at least one of their SysAdm's interview you it will become fairly apparent how little you actually know with just a few questions. During my two most recent job hunts I did run across employers that requested certification but none that required it.
The main thing in interviewing with technical people is don't BS - they'll know you don't know. Don't be afraid to say "that's an area I'm not familiar with". SysAdm is different depending on where you go. You mainly have to show you can THINK during the interview. Professional SysAdms know that regardless of what you've studied or been exposed to in your career you ARE going to run across something you don't know and will have to be able to solve that problem logically.
[I do not understand what that handsome and intelligent moderator said, so I am going to sit on the naughty step for a day] providing free exam braindumps as demo version. You can try.
Last edited by XavierP; 11-17-2013 at 03:11 PM.
Reason: Edited for emphasis
Do not offer brain dump material on this site or other material which will help others cheat their tests. Please re-read the Rules you agreed to when signing up to this site.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.