GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Originally posted by sapilas
I found Noone to do serious work on Linux yet...
So y do you still using it......I wonder..
Then I'll be the first...
I don't own windows AT ALL. My only OS is Slackware 9.1. I did my entire university dissertation on linux - not because I'm a masochist but because I found it far more preductive. Mine was a computer science degree and I found the integration of compilers, linkers, make, etc in Linux to be far superior to that of windows. Vi is STILL the best programmer's text editor (ok, so there's emacs too...) which I used to edit all my project's source code (java, urgh!). I ran my project on a windows machine in the lab and the performance was laughable - it would hang for minutes on the press of a button. Turned out to be that windows needed me to specify a priority for the threads I had created OK, so no biggy.
Why else do I use linux? Well my project also had to have documentation. It's a toss-up between MS Word ($129.99) or OpenOffice (free - that's $0). As it happens I use AbiWord because it's cute but that's besides the point.
Above all else I got fed up with my computer freezing for no good reason, I got fed up with the 21 new viruses my virus scanner would detect every week, and I got fed up with Microsoft expecting me to pay for a new operating system every few years just so I could run the software I wanted to run.
Between these and the monster problems of spyware, maybe the question may need to be "Why use anything but windows. I have been doz free since Christmas and it's wonderful
I wonder what'll happen to your enforced WinXP activation you do after a new installation. After 3 or 4 years, you won't be able to use WinXP because there's no one to receive your activation thingie. They want you to get a new Windows version. That's legal, and I find it a possible serious antitrust problem (threat) if I move to XP. So it's my current Win98 or moving to Linux 100% someday. Linux doesn't go out-of-date like my Win98 has.
Linux security has convinced me. 40 viruses, few active. No spyware.
Linux is a OS made by users for other users.
Linux belongs to me when it's installed on my computer, and not to Microsoft Corporation or any other software giant. Read the GNU GPL.
Linux software (and also free as in freedom Windows software) allowes me to take part to it's development.
Linux is friendly for my hardware even though I'm still using a 5 year-old PC. Something the guys at school can't understand.
Microsoft Windows is not user friendly, but it's Microsoft friendly.
I'm not angry to Microsoft but these are just facts.
Yes, well this debate will never end. Ever. It is some sort of weird disease that there are either physcos for linux or haters of linux. I think there are like, what, a whole 10 of us on LQ who DONT hate microsoft? The rest are either lovers or people who hate it and curse at and flame anyone who actually says they like it.
windows XP is very friendly,U can use it without knowing how it runs,but to me,it is not a good idea!
so I use Linux,in fact,I use it for studying more than application.
If I want to finish my work ,I use windows more.
Well for me personally I never saw a need to bash Microsoft in order to show that Linux is superior. The record pretty much speaks for itself. With an Operating System as good as Linux, verbally bashing the competition is not necessary.
If you want a good juke box and online porno streamer and you don't mind the occasional denial of service attack then, by all means, load Windows XP and have at it. Just don't get too comfortable after downloading those 37 critical updates because you are no more safe than you were out of the box. I believe service pack 1 actually has several of it's own service packs now. It's a perfect example of, "Let's sell it now and build it as we go."
Originally posted by SelaAragon Well for me personally I never saw a need to bash Microsoft in order to show that Linux is superior. The record pretty much speaks for itself. With an Operating System as good as Linux, verbally bashing the competition is not necessary.
Amen! Let the product die from its own disease!
Bashing the other guy just weakens you in the eyes of an observer.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.