GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Some share holders in large companies don't take a salary for many reasons. If they are a large share holder and independently wealthy, they don't really need the money but have a good interest in making the company succeed.
It's not unusual. The outgoing CEO of HP had a $1m salary, but took about $50m per year in stock options, bonuses and so on. All Jobs is doing is giving himself a nominal salary so that their pay system can recognise him as an employee and then taking the real money via other means. It may even be made as a payment to "Steve Jobs Ltd" for "consultancy". That's the way these things work when you are absolutely loaded.
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by hughetorrance
He probably pays less tax and stuff so he gets more for his extra special favourite... himself !
exactly thats how the rich get richer and the poor get poorer
rich people can afford to pay people to help them keep their money
poor people are too busy living paycheck to pacheck to sometimes even have a decent savings account, sad but true
This '$1 a year bonus' gimmick started out after the whole bonus stink from AIG. This is supposedly to demonstrate how 'sensitive' CEOs are in this kind of economic climate. Either way, I rather like how some European companies handle their CEO pays, they only get six figures for being a CEO, no reason to get millions. Thats the way it should be.
exactly thats how the rich get richer and the poor get poorer
rich people can afford to pay people to help them keep their money
poor people are too busy living paycheck to pacheck to sometimes even have a decent savings account, sad but true
Or even a living wage for FoxxCon workers; but then living is nothing to the ipod.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.