GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
View Poll Results: Will you ever pay for a license to use Ubuntu in the future?
If I used Ubuntu regularly I would send a donation.
If I had to pay, mkfs.ext3 and a simple re-install with a different distro would follow within minutes of the change although I don't ubuntu and have 0-xtra cash lying around atm .
It is very unlikely that they would go back on this - I think the OP was setting up a bit of a straw man.
Even if they did decide to prevent free downloads and sell their OS (presumably as a nicely packaged version), though, they would still be required to release the source-code to any changes they made to software covered by the GPL and other copyleft licenses. This would leave the way open to someone to take the code and build "Commbuntu", in the same way as RHEL code is used to build CentOS. People would then be left with the choice of paying for a commercially supported version, or using the free version without vendor support.
This is apart from the fact that there would be many alternative distributions that would remain free, so it would almost certainly be an incredibly bad move on Canonical's part, prompting an exodus to Mint, or Debian, or whatever.
I didn't vote, because there wasn't an "Ain't gonna happen" option.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.