Lossless discussion revisited
I did a test. Ripped 320 Kbps CBR MP3s of a few of my favorite songs and then reripped lossless versions. Could tell distinct differences between the two in every song (some more obvious than others).
Maybe I have uber-sensitive ears? Not ruling out placebo, but I've heard these songs so many times... Maybe I'm crazy.
Maybe I have uber-sensitive ears? Not ruling out placebo, but I've heard these songs so many times... Maybe I'm crazy.
Total Comments 4
Comments
-
Isn't it "lossless"?
Posted 11-11-2011 at 05:04 AM by brianL -
Indeed…ur spllenig iz not diong too wlel.
Posted 11-11-2011 at 02:44 PM by MrCode -
Fix'd
Posted 11-11-2011 at 06:00 PM by lupusarcanus -
Not quite…your title might be correct, but your post still has a "loseless" in there.
Heil grammar!Posted 11-12-2011 at 12:11 AM by MrCode