Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back > Blogs > Lone Wolf
User Name


Rate this Entry

Lossless discussion revisited

Posted 11-11-2011 at 12:08 AM by lupusarcanus
Updated 11-12-2011 at 12:50 AM by lupusarcanus

I did a test. Ripped 320 Kbps CBR MP3s of a few of my favorite songs and then reripped lossless versions. Could tell distinct differences between the two in every song (some more obvious than others).

Maybe I have uber-sensitive ears? Not ruling out placebo, but I've heard these songs so many times... Maybe I'm crazy.
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 23735 Comments 4
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 4


  1. Old Comment
    Isn't it "lossless"?
    Posted 11-11-2011 at 05:04 AM by brianL brianL is offline
  2. Old Comment
    Indeed…ur spllenig iz not diong too wlel.
    Posted 11-11-2011 at 02:44 PM by MrCode MrCode is offline
  3. Old Comment
    Posted 11-11-2011 at 06:00 PM by lupusarcanus lupusarcanus is offline
  4. Old Comment
    Not quite…your title might be correct, but your post still has a "loseless" in there.

    Heil grammar!
    Posted 11-12-2011 at 12:11 AM by MrCode MrCode is offline


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration