LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-31-2004, 10:18 AM   #1
Epix
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: Alot.
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Slackware suited for REALLY old computer?


I have a P1 133 MhZ with a small amount of ram and i want to run some distro with X. Would slackware be suited for this task? Is it not too hard to use?
 
Old 10-31-2004, 10:19 AM   #2
rotvogel
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 534

Rep: Reputation: 30
How much is a small amount of RAM ?
 
Old 10-31-2004, 10:26 AM   #3
xushi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,288

Rep: Reputation: 45
I ran slackware 9.1 on a P133 with 24Mb of ram (upgraded to 28), 700Mb HD

It had an email server, apache 2, mysql, and a few more serveces. It ran well, although php did slow it down a bit.

As long as you stick to CLI and don't use any desktop environment on it, you should be fine.
 
Old 10-31-2004, 11:10 AM   #4
HuMJohn
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: California - home of Slackware
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 59

Rep: Reputation: 15
In the corner of my office, there is a Slackware server, running along, just fine. It's main purpose is to be a file/email/web server. And it does that job very well. Rarely do I have to go into it, but when I do, I use an xterm to do any touch-up/configuration. I do have X windowing on it. But I do not have desktop environments (read gnome/KDE et al) on it. I do have the simpler window clients.

This server is an old, very old, Toshiba laptop. Pent-133 with only 16 Megs of RAM. The original HD died, a few years back, and I replaced it with one that is five times larger (couldn't find anything as small as the original disk was.)

I have been toying with the idea to down that sucker and put Slackware 10.0 on it. But I just love the uptime that it has been showing and I hate to save off all my files (outside of the occasional archiving) and re-installing them after I upgrade. Maybe one day.....

Incidentally, it is running Slackware 7.1, with certain portions updated to keep it nice and tight.

Check these two URLs out:

http://www.netcraft.com/whats?host=www.jcon.com

http://www.jcon.com

Last edited by HuMJohn; 10-31-2004 at 11:12 AM.
 
Old 10-31-2004, 01:33 PM   #5
Gato Azul
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: /dev/null
Distribution: CentOS, Ubuntu
Posts: 128

Rep: Reputation: 16
Vector Linux

You also might want to check out VectorLinux. It's based off Slackware, but even more lightweight and one of its aims is bringing life back to older machines (and being super fast on newer ones). In my own experience, Vector's compatibility with Slackware packages is really good, so I'd highly recommend giving it a try. You might also want to check out Mad Penguin's review of the latest version, VectorLinux 4.3.
 
Old 11-01-2004, 05:37 AM   #6
chuck_notorious
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Debian / Mandrake
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
I guess it's a bit blasphemous in this forum but although I do *now* use slackware, my old toshiba 4900CT with a P75, 16MB ram and 800MB hdd has been a reliable little debian box all this year. It was one of my first proper linux projects.

I chose debian because I was following an installation on a similar laptop I saw on the web. As it turns out, debian is great because you can do a minimal install off about four floppies and then have a *very* clean system to download more packages from using apt-get.

I installed X and fluxbox and used a browser called dillo which all worked great!

--Chuck
 
Old 11-01-2004, 07:28 AM   #7
rvijay
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec, Canada
Distribution: Debian HD install of Knoppix 5.0.1
Posts: 921
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 64
The minimum requirement is Pentium 500 MHz so this rules me out. There is also an English page that one can get to by cliking on the main screen English Logo.
 
Old 11-01-2004, 04:32 PM   #8
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 32
a good rule of thumb, in reality, mimimum requirements don't matter in linux.

You probably could run slackware on that machine. Probably not 10, but maybe 9. You most certainly could not run KDe or GNOME, but you might get away with fluxbox.
 
Old 11-01-2004, 05:22 PM   #9
rvijay
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec, Canada
Distribution: Debian HD install of Knoppix 5.0.1
Posts: 921
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 64
Quote:
Originally posted by rvijay
The minimum requirement is Pentium 500 MHz so this rules me out. There is also an English page that one can get to by cliking on the main screen English Logo.
Posted under wrong thread IN ERROR. Please ignore the above.

Vijay
 
Old 11-01-2004, 06:54 PM   #10
kersten78
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Gentoo, openSuSE
Posts: 358

Rep: Reputation: 33
I have slackware 10 running on a Pentium 233mmx. I did have to upgrade the ram (from 32 to 96). Hard drive space is a bit tight w/ only 2 gigs, but it fits fine without KDE and Gnome. Fluxbox is no problem at all. After partitioning /swap, I had about 1.6 gigs, and I've used up about 1.2. I'm sure the install could have been scaled down a quite bit, but I chose to do the full install minus KDE and Gnome to avoid dependency issues (and headaches ). With some research, I could have probably gotten rid of a lot more than just KDE and Gnome...and that's next on my list of things to do. The 400 or so megs of space left on my drive is not going to last very long.
 
Old 11-02-2004, 09:35 AM   #11
heri0n
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Distribution: Slackware 10.0
Posts: 48

Rep: Reputation: 15
come on
you guys are amateurs :P
i installed slack ( i think 9? 9.1?) on a 486/66 with 20 mb ram
i put in a 3.2 gig hd though
took me over 2 days to compile center-icq!(console multiprotocol im client)
haha
133mhz is quite sufficient
i assume you have like at least 16mb ram
 
Old 11-02-2004, 10:13 AM   #12
bruj3w
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: england
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 164

Rep: Reputation: 30
i have slack 10 on 100mhz amd-k5 with 32mbram.

it runs fine.
 
Old 11-02-2004, 11:49 AM   #13
kersten78
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Gentoo, openSuSE
Posts: 358

Rep: Reputation: 33
lol@these old systems running slack 10 fine....ahh the joys of linux.
 
Old 11-02-2004, 01:25 PM   #14
JunctaJuvant
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Wageningen, the Netherlands
Distribution: OS X & Linux Mint
Posts: 488

Rep: Reputation: 31
I once succesfully installed Slackware 7.1 using floppies on a Toshiba T1950CT with 8MB RAM, 200MB HDD and Intel 486 40Mhz cpu
It didn't run X though, but I did install a Java SDK on it for a laugh (can't recall which version, but older one obviously). If my memory serves me well, it took over half an hour to compile the classic "hello world" program...or was it to run the program? I forget ;-)
 
Old 11-02-2004, 05:37 PM   #15
Artimus
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: 30
Slackware Current (about a month old) on a 50mhz i486 laptop with 4mb of ram.

Hardware requirements don't mean a thing.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is Fedora suited to beginners? 357mag Fedora 3 03-08-2005 02:00 AM
best suited for Presario 2100 byen Linux - Software 1 02-22-2005 06:33 AM
Which Certs are best suited for my situation??? zepplin611 Linux - Certification 3 07-12-2004 12:36 PM
Setup I want - What linux applications would be best suited? Boggit Linux - Newbie 4 06-29-2003 04:14 PM
which distro is best suited for a laptop? Randall Linux - Newbie 13 11-03-2001 07:32 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration