LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 03-03-2018, 08:15 AM   #31
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242

the whole rant from that one that has been ranting against me ... tells a story too.

Hopefully the OP removed everything to do with WireShark and started again using slackbuilds to do so.
 
Old 03-03-2018, 03:21 PM   #32
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
that is from post 6, where he was already given information, so why do I have to repeat what a someone else already said?
You say to install portaudio... nothing else and then tell OP that it should work. How am I twisting your words? I repeated back exactly what you said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
Taking everything out of context to try and prove your case against me. What are you a Protest-ant? What can give explanation to your way of thinking?
What was the point of post #6? The only thing I quoted you on was that ponce's repo was for -current, which was wrong. The rest of the post was directed at OP and not at you (that's the whole reason I put @OP before I wrote the rest of it). I have no idea why you felt a need to comment on the rest of my post, especially saying that installing portaudio "should" fix OPs problem, when I flat out explained it needed more than that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
removed a lot of it didn't you? that there is a lot of information to take in before using any or all of it, if at all. No where in any part of the world is it written one HAS to take any part of that suggestion, or all of it. The burden falls upon the receiver not the giver, to use all of it, part of it, or none of it whatsoever.

You pull out a piece of it that you think shows fault in what I did, then you push it in my face and hold it up for all to see and say look at this man he is guilty! I show you my proof.
I removed information to keep things short... not to try and twist your words around. You seem to forget the posts after that. I quoted that same line in my next reply and stated that simply installing portaudio won't fix OPs problem. Then, as a reply to a completely different, unrelated portion of your post, I then explained why pkgs.net is not recommended. You somehow thought the two were related. You stated that installing one dep won't break the system... which I never said it would. Your comprehension needs some work.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
you try to twist my words I use, even in your own head, to keep you believing I am guilty of something I am not, as well as try to prove to others what you believe about me. By removing most of what I said to try and make a case against me.
You are guilty of poor comprehension. In my first post, my only thing I directed at you was that ponce's repo was for 14.2 (which would've been easily seen had you just looked at the url). Then you had to go through and try and defend the rest of your previous post, which I did not reference at all. Why did you feel a need to defend it when I didn't reference it at all?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
you are a dishonest man in all of your honesty.
Brevity does not make someone dishonest. I am not trying to twist your words. If you feel I mistook your words, feel free to try and correct it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
You show signs of rigged thinking, and are letting your pride get the best of you. Not taking everything into consideration, Only removing the parts you think you can use to try and prove what you came to believe using a closed mined way of thinking. That only causes you to show your faults more then your virtues.
This is just laughable that you're the one saying this. I am not a prideful person and I am more than willing to admit my mistakes when they occur (and they do occur -- here's one that happened yesterday). In this case, for some reason your pride was hurt when I said that ponce's repo was for 14.2 and then maybe you felt I was attacking the rest of your post, without me even referencing it.

I have nothing against you... I did not attack your post, I just provided more information to OP based on the information in ponce's repo, which I referenced in my post.
 
Old 03-03-2018, 03:40 PM   #33
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242
Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
You say to install portaudio... nothing else and then tell OP that it should work. How am I twisting your words? I repeated back exactly what you said.
should does not mean shall, period.
look it up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post

What was the point of post #6? The only thing I quoted you on was that ponce's repo was for -current, which was wrong. The rest of the post was directed at OP and not at you (that's the whole reason I put @OP before I wrote the rest of it). I have no idea why you felt a need to comment on the rest of my post, especially saying that installing portaudio "should" fix OPs problem, when I flat out explained it needed more than that.
I was just suggesting a try to see if it could be a quick fix, why because it was saying it did not have portaudio, therefore add it, what is so hard about understanding that one?




Quote:
Originally Posted by bassmadrigal View Post
I removed information to keep things short... not to try and twist your words around. You seem to forget the posts after that. I quoted that same line in my next reply and stated that simply installing portaudio won't fix OPs problem. Then, as a reply to a completely different, unrelated portion of your post, I then explained why pkgs.net is not recommended. You somehow thought the two were related. You stated that installing one dep won't break the system... which I never said it would. Your comprehension needs some work.



You are guilty of poor comprehension. In my first post, my only thing I directed at you was that ponce's repo was for 14.2 (which would've been easily seen had you just looked at the url). Then you had to go through and try and defend the rest of your previous post, which I did not reference at all. Why did you feel a need to defend it when I didn't reference it at all?



Brevity does not make someone dishonest. I am not trying to twist your words. If you feel I mistook your words, feel free to try and correct it.



This is just laughable that you're the one saying this. I am not a prideful person and I am more than willing to admit my mistakes when they occur (and they do occur -- here's one that happened yesterday). In this case, for some reason your pride was hurt when I said that ponce's repo was for 14.2 and then maybe you felt I was attacking the rest of your post, without me even referencing it.

I have nothing against you... I did not attack your post, I just provided more information to OP based on the information in ponce's repo, which I referenced in my post.
not prideful?

Then why are you insisting on continuing this conversation trying to prove what I did as a grave mistake , wrong or whatever it is you're trying to prove?

post 3 and 6 are the only ones that I gave advice on what the OP could do.

Nothing I said said that it WILL or SHALL fix it. I just suggested try giving it what it said it was missing or starting over using Ponce slackbuilds or using source to install wireshark with its deps.

if you want to continue this file a complaint in the local world legal system.

Last edited by BW-userx; 03-03-2018 at 03:55 PM.
 
Old 03-03-2018, 04:40 PM   #34
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
should does not mean shall, period.
look it up.
I included "should" as well. That is not twisting your words. I repeated them exactly as you typed. The fact that you took your own words wrong should probably imply that it wasn't the right word to use. "Should" is a lot more implying than "might". You are correct that it isn't as definitive as "will", but it still implies that you fully expect it to fix the problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
I was just suggesting a try to see if it could be a quick fix, why because it was saying it did not have portaudio, therefore add it, what is so hard about understanding that one?
And I didn't mention anything in my initial post about what you wrote. You somehow thought my post explaining what OP had to do was an attack at you, when it had nothing to do with you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
not prideful?

Then why are you insisting on continuing this conversation trying to prove what I did as a grave mistake , wrong or whatever it is you're trying to prove?
Where did I say what you provided was a grave mistake? Nowhere. However, I did state that just installing portaudio won't fix the problem. That is when your pride kicked in and started this whole ridiculous thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
post 3 and 6 are the only ones that I gave advice on what the OP could do.
What was the point of post #6? You provided the info you felt OP needed in #3. I provided additional info (without attacking your post) in post #4. Why did you feel a need to throw a bunch of extra information in post #6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
Nothing I said said that it WILL or SHALL fix it. I just suggested try giving it what it said it was missing or starting over using Ponce slackbuilds or using source to install wireshark with its deps.
And I never said that you said it will or shall fix it. I used the same words you did... "should".

Quote:
Originally Posted by BW-userx View Post
if you want to continue this file a complaint in the local world legal system.
I have no complaint to file. As I said, I have nothing against you. I just want to ensure OP has the proper information to fix their issue.
 
Old 03-03-2018, 05:58 PM   #35
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242
meanwhile back at the ranch...
 
Old 03-03-2018, 09:19 PM   #36
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
Slackware 14.2 32bit - can't run wireshark-2.4.3-i586-1ponce
and the latest replies
what gives

Last edited by Drakeo; 03-03-2018 at 09:20 PM.
 
Old 03-03-2018, 09:24 PM   #37
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
the OP careless who is the pivot man.
 
Old 03-05-2018, 04:03 PM   #38
senglory
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2018
Posts: 6

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Question

Ok, I installed portaudio, but now wireshark wants
Quote:
bash-4.3# wireshark
wireshark: error while loading shared libraries: libQt5PrintSupport.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Where to get his lib?
 
Old 03-05-2018, 04:20 PM   #39
BW-userx
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Sep 2013
Location: Somewhere in my head.
Distribution: Slackware (15 current), Slack15, Ubuntu studio, MX Linux, FreeBSD 13.1, WIn10
Posts: 10,342

Rep: Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242Reputation: 2242
Quote:
Originally Posted by senglory View Post
Ok, I installed portaudio, but now wireshark wants


Where to get his lib?


you're better starting from the git go. to insure that the build matches your system.

to reference what you need
https://slackbuilds.org/repository/1...ork/wireshark/
Ponces git hub



https://github.com/Ponce/slackbuilds

Ponce
http://slackware.ponce.cc/blog/

to get a quick list of what to remove
Code:
ls /var/log/packages | ponce
and a key word in which ever package you used to install your last package for wireshark. portaudio

EDIT
Read post #36


I have not researched that, but you might want to.

Last edited by BW-userx; 03-05-2018 at 04:26 PM.
 
Old 03-05-2018, 04:55 PM   #40
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,100

Rep: Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177Reputation: 4177
senglory, posts #4 and #5 should already be enough for you to solve: read them carefully and follow the hints there.

don't let other posts confuse you or get you on the wrong path.

Last edited by ponce; 03-05-2018 at 04:56 PM.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-05-2018, 05:05 PM   #41
bassmadrigal
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: West Jordan, UT, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,792

Rep: Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656Reputation: 6656
Quote:
Originally Posted by senglory View Post
Ok, I installed portaudio, but now wireshark wants


Where to get his lib?
That likely means you're missing qt5. qt5 has several other required dependencies (libxkbcommon and libinput, and libinput requires libwacom), however, there's other dependencies you're going to need to install as well. The full list, based on SBo's requirements and ponce's extra info provided is:

However, ponce does not have the libwacom package available, so his libinput may be built without libwacom support. You might try installing all but libwacom and see if it works, if it doesn't you may want to try and build and install libwacom manually.

Once you have installed all of those, wireshark should work.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-05-2018, 09:11 PM   #42
Drakeo
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Urbana IL
Distribution: Slackware, Slacko,
Posts: 3,716
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483Reputation: 483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulo2 View Post
I do run exactly those commands I posted. From 'man slackpkg':
Code:
       Slackpkg can be used to upgrade the whole distribution.
       The usual way is to do:

            # slackpkg update
            # slackpkg install-new
            # slackpkg upgrade-all
            # slackpkg clean-system
Indeed, I forgot to post that 'slackpkg update gpg' is a one time command, as said in the manpage.
Code:
            If you need to update Slackware's GPG key, run

                 # slackpkg update gpg

            The GPG key doesn't change. This should be a "one time" command  -
            run it once and forget it...
your rude and going to report this. you will break new peoples systems your out of line. we are slackers. not rude like you and hurtful.
the man has nothing to do with linked libraries
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] Slackware current: 32bit openssl-solibs-1.0.2m-i586-1 bathory Slackware 8 11-08-2017 02:21 PM
[SOLVED] sudoer for letting a normal user run wireshark jzoudavy Linux - Newbie 2 11-14-2012 10:31 AM
Fedora 13 32bit and then Linux Mint 32bit and then Ubuntu 10.04 32bit ciao303 Linux - Newbie 3 08-09-2010 11:03 PM
slackware 13.0 32bit the "/usr/bin/sha1pass" perl script can NOT run ginkgo Slackware 3 03-05-2010 05:00 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration