Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
01-04-2003, 09:05 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Off the coast of Madadascar
Posts: 498
Rep:
|
Question about slackware-current
I've heard people say that using a beta distro-release such as Slackware-current is a bad idea. But I always thought that the new packages that were added to the tree were stable to begin with. It's just that <that guy who releases all the slackware releases, can't remember name> didn't want to call it a new version yet.
What do you think?
--tarballedtux
|
|
|
|
01-04-2003, 09:29 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: Arizona, US, Earth
Distribution: Slackware, (Non-Linux: Solaris 7,8,9; OSX; BeOS)
Posts: 1,152
Rep:
|
My understanding of Slackware-current is that Patrick is still working
on getting everything integrated. It's unstable because at any time
any package may be missing dependencies, only half installed, or
any number of other problems. Sure, the packages are stable
releases, but the entire conglomeration of them isn't necessarily
stable. Putting together a linux distribution isn't as easy as slapping
a bunch of packages together on a disk -- check out Linux From
Scratch. . .
|
|
|
|
01-04-2003, 09:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Washington D.C, USA
Distribution: Slack 12, Etch, Gutsy
Posts: 453
Rep:
|
Slackware-current is the development branch of the distribution. For the most part things will work under current, but it is still being tested for stability. Look through the change logs , say the last 5-10 entries in current, and you should understand what I mean. As an example there WERE (are?) some problems with the new RPM binaries so they had to be regressed a few versions. If you happened to be using current before this was fixed and needed to use RPM...
Overall current is fine for a tinkerer or someone who wants to test/help make the new release of Slackware stable. But it is absolutely not for production server use, IMHO not production workstation use either. Not to say current is crash happy, but it has quirks, and quirks are not good for 24/7 servers.
Last edited by Mephisto; 01-04-2003 at 09:46 PM.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2003, 02:28 PM
|
#4
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2002
Location: Bs.As., Argentina
Distribution: Slackware; Debian; Suse; RedHat
Posts: 66
Rep:
|
Iīve been using slack-current for almost 3 months now (almost since it got out). Iīve yet to see any problem...
The box is running 24/7 ssh, http, ftp, pop and smtp servers and used as a worksation almost every day, and i still havenīt witnessed any problem due to it being an "unstable" release..
The only real problem i see, is that it is built on the new gcc, therefore many or most of the .tgz slack package (which are built on the old gcc) will not work or have problems.
If can live happily building every software you need then you will probably be just fine.
Mux.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|