[SOLVED] Option to disable display of OS and Browser on posts?
LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The same thing could be said currently for users who don't keep their "Distribution" string updated in their accounts (or only list their primary distribution while they use others). If anyone is making assumptions about the distribution in question by information displayed in the user's profile, they are taking a leap of faith in the first place.
Yup- Quite true, indeed. And then there are the ones who use multiple distros (not unlike myself) and do have them listed. One still needs to know with which distro I'm having issues, which, in certain cases, won't be the one I'm using to post the problem.
While I struggle to understand that you are applying this capability for a positive reason, I strongly disagree with websites that probe my system to determine what OS I'm using. Perhaps I'm just a little 'set in my ways' from past experiences with sites that done so for the sake of promoting the browser or OS of their choice.
Cheers
Your browser reveals this information whenever it requests a page. I don't like it either, but the fact is that different systems have different capabilities - as do different browsers - and therefore any website that is "one size fits all" necessarily is very vanilla. One of the major bugaboos of website designers is the unfortunate necessity to take the OS AND the browser (particularly IE vs everything else) into account when preparing a page to send.
I used to have all the referrer information blocked from being sent - or I would send an obnoxious "none of your damn business" string, but as the web grew and became more complicated, that caused many sites to break when I tried to view/use them.
Recognizing the necessity, I finally caved and I do correctly report my user agent and distro these days.
Don't know anything about IE, could be that that one cannot do that. I'm talking about opera (9 and/or 10 with linux), but there are probably more (not all people use FF or IE).
@Nevahre - calm down please. No One is calling you a liar
Yes he is.....
quote from me: I'm talking about opera (9 and/or 10 with linux)
quote from H_TexMex_H: I'm _quite sure_(!!!) you can do that with Opera.
I think a guru should be more careful with statement he makes (#94 and #98)
With opera you can change the browser (the one the other site thinks it is) but not the OS (distro, not in general like linux). It is hard coded, user can set 1 2 3 4 and 5, not the distro. I did do my 'homework' on this.
The posts you are referring to were made in good faith. You obviously have some more detailed knowledge, which is fine, but there is no cause to be calling people "liars".
It appears that English may not be your first language. Please look up the definition of "liar". I think you will find that it involves knowingly saying something that is false. There is no evidence of that here.
Liar: someone that does not tell/speak/write the truth.
His first post was probebly in good faith, and I did try to correct him (in a nice way, not?). Forum should give correct information, not?
His second post I don't know about the good faith. You can only be sure if you now what you do, with opera he does not. liar seems correct, very much after his first post and my reaction.
Why are 2 moderators mailing me. I did not do anything wrong. My english (not good I now) does not have anything to do with that.
Well, just to prove that I'm no liar, there are two possible ways to do this, not sure how to properly test the detection used by LQ, but here are the user agent strings that can be obtained:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.