What programs would you like to see ported to Linux?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This week I'd give my kingdom for a Bitware. Just the fax part would do.
Also, something to play them .movs.
(I might withdraw that if mplayer installs okay.)
Originally posted by spindles Also, something to play them .movs.
(I might withdraw that if mplayer installs okay.)
mplayer and xine both play avi, mpeg, and mov files wonderfully, providing you have the latest codec libraries installed.
Now, getting mplayer configured properly for your browsers is the trick. I got sick of having to search for the plugins all the time every time I upgrade a browser, so now in each browser I delete the plugins directory and create a symbolic link from {browserdirectory}/plugins to /opt/mozilla/plugins and since then browser upgrades and plugin upgrades have not given me any problems on any boxes I've done this on. It's much better than adding more search paths to konqueror or copying all of the latest plugins to /opt/firefox/plugins again.
I wish the various distributions would just do this out of the box. A standard location for plugins should exist - maybe /opt/mozilla/plugins or better yet /opt/browser/shared for shared resources, and /opt/browser/shared/plugins for plugins.
if apple ported Logic 7 to linux, id be a happy man - but thats not gona happen as apple bought logic from emagic so they would bring more people to mac (from windows).
(logic is the industry favorite audio sequencer - id say at least 80% of the pro music maket use it)
So.... im still waiting for a linux alternative; rosegarden (authough it is a f*ckin good open source project) is still in the stone age compared to logic.
PS. GIMP IS BETTER THAN PHOTOSHOP !!! iv used photoshop for the last 5 years or so, and i ditched it after installing 6000+ fonts as it kept crashing on load - iv now been using gimp for about a month, and once you get into it... i actually prefer it. it has a tiny bit further to go and then it will leave photoshop behind. RESPECT TO THE GIMP TEAM, UR BIG.
ok lol, maybe i did get a bit carried away :P - but iv been using gimp for a while now, and i feel it is extremely under-rated. i dont work primarily in the graphics industry, but i know a bit about design, and iv made some pretty good stuff with gimp - and i find it more productive (for me) than photoshop to use. (once you've adapted to its layout)
Distribution: Gentoo (desktop), Arch linux (laptop)
Posts: 728
Rep:
IT IS TIME TO CLOSE THIS THREAD
It 's a fact that many (not all) program on windows is better than
it's version on Linux.
So why would we waste time here to talk about that fact and
see it never change. How many program has been listed here?
How many of them have been sucessfully ported to linux?
So I suggest stopping dream and let's work, Let port these
program to linux yourself rather than dream of someone do
it for you.
I dissagree that all windows programs are better than their linux equivelents.
if you actually think about it, most linux programs ur talking about havn't even reached version 1 yet - they are still on 0.19 etc. so think about when them programs have reached version 3 or 4 ....
and also, remember that *nix has been used almost always for networking till a few years ago. So most software is just getting started. give linux less than 5 years and it will have defeated microsoft.
i much prefer to use:
- OOo - not M$ office
- Firefox - not M$ IE
- Bluefish - not dreamweaver (html is so easy, why do you need to design it graphically!!??)
- xine / totem- not winamp
- gftp - not whatever u use on windows
- giFT - not kazaa (gift is much better!)
- gedit - not notepad - ha ha ha, gedit is so much better
- gimp not photoshop - i just prefer it, authough photoshop is still a bit better (not for long :-P)
- *nix not windows !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
infact, the only software i use that isn't sutable on linux is:
- logic 7
- cubase SX3
- (and for certain clients, reason 2.5)
** but thats what Mac is for! ** - multimedia
btw Mac = unix
actually, theres no need for windows at all
by the way, are you using kde or gnome? - look at how much better they are than microsoft's telly-tubby-land XP GUI.
I would like to see Macromedia Studio MX 2004, Microsoft Streets and Trips, and Adobe Photoshop Elements ported to Linux.
I realize that HTML editors like Bluefish and Quanta Plus are available. I also realize that purchasing a handheld GPS or Palm device could curve the need for using my Linux laptop as a GPS mapping system. And likewise, I also realize that GIMP and other graphics programs are available.
While there are some promising open source equivelents, I'm sorry to say there are none that can rival any of those three software packages.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.