LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software
User Name
Password
Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2011, 09:29 PM   #1
gentisle
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Distribution: LinuxMint, OpenBSD
Posts: 263

Rep: Reputation: 9
Firefox Is DEAD! (Killed By Microsoft?)


Well, I tried Firefox 4, and it really tanks. With each new version, less and less extensions will work anymore. I wonder who the people are who are making the decisions to program out all of the usability of the extensions. The only extension on my installation that I could see and use was NoScript. Gone was Video Downloads, Download Statusbar, the weather, and all the rest. Since extensions where one of the big things that always made Firefox so much better than IE, I'm guessing Satan took over the design of Firefox. I say Satan because I can't imagine any system designer being bone headed enough to do something like that, and still be an I.T. person. So there has to be something evil going on here.

Seriously, what were those people thinking? And what do you think about version 4? I'm going back to 3.5.
 
Old 06-19-2011, 10:13 PM   #2
mvanwey
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Hesperia, CA
Distribution: Ubuntu 14.04
Posts: 6
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 1
Thumbs down Firefox 4

I'm jumping back also
I thought Version 5 Beta would fix it, but it took out LastPass. Not Acceptable.
I'm fine with SeaMonkey, but the Kid & I share a machine & he uses extensions that aren't available for it.
Going Back to 3.6.17
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 01:51 AM   #3
speck
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: US
Distribution: Slackware 14.2
Posts: 375

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
I'm using Download Statusbar on Firefox 6 (Aurora) without any issues.

You can install an add-on called Add-on Compatibility Reporter that will allow you to install other add-ons that are not "officially" compatible with your version of Firefox. Of course not all will be compatible, but about 75% of my unsupported add-ons worked fine.

Also, I think the newer versions of Firefox, especially 6, are quite a bit better (speedier and uses less RAM) than the 3.x series.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 02:02 AM   #4
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
The most people that write extensions are not paid programmers. So they do it in their spare time, and sometimes need some time to adapt it to a new version. I wouldn't even think about complaining that an extension isn't working in a beta version.
Just give them some time or, if you need it really, may be donate to the developers?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 03:01 AM   #5
KenJackson
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland, USA
Distribution: Fedora and others
Posts: 757

Rep: Reputation: 145Reputation: 145
Huh?
In FF 4.0, I just clicked Tools -> Add-ons, and entered "download" in the search box.

I got 466 results!

There's gobs and gobs of good extensions. (Personally, I just can't imagine surfing without Adblock Plus.)
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 04:47 AM   #6
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
All the extensions that I have work with FF 4.0 or there exist equivalent extensions to replace them.

The bigger problem is that they keep changing the UI to make it more different and less usable, IMO.

It's true I don't like where FF is heading, but maybe someone will fork it and it will be saved.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 09:27 AM   #7
Mr. Alex
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Distribution: No more Linux. Done with it.
Posts: 1,238

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I agree that Firefox 4 is a huge step back from v3 (and I wonder what will Firefox 5 be...). You can use SeaMonkey as a classical Mozilla and Midori wich seems to become better and better from version to version.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 11:41 AM   #8
KenJackson
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Maryland, USA
Distribution: Fedora and others
Posts: 757

Rep: Reputation: 145Reputation: 145
I forgot to mention that I appreciate Firefox 4.0.
I think it's a minor improvement on a great browser.
 
Old 06-20-2011, 12:26 PM   #9
frieza
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: harvard, il
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.4,DD-WRT micro plus ssh,lfs-6.6,Fedora 15,Fedora 16
Posts: 3,233

Rep: Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406Reputation: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by gentisle View Post
Well, I tried Firefox 4, and it really tanks. With each new version, less and less extensions will work anymore. I wonder who the people are who are making the decisions to program out all of the usability of the extensions. The only extension on my installation that I could see and use was NoScript. Gone was Video Downloads, Download Statusbar, the weather, and all the rest. Since extensions where one of the big things that always made Firefox so much better than IE, I'm guessing Satan took over the design of Firefox. I say Satan because I can't imagine any system designer being bone headed enough to do something like that, and still be an I.T. person. So there has to be something evil going on here.

Seriously, what were those people thinking? And what do you think about version 4? I'm going back to 3.5.
i've never trie download statusbar, but i do have forecastfox working as well as firebug with firefox 4, yeah you have to turn on the 'add-on bar' tool bar to see the output

with new versions of software, change is inevitable, if you aren't paying for it or contributing to it, then don't complain it isn't what you want, we can't always get everything we want ya know.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 01:46 PM   #10
H_TeXMeX_H
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by frieza View Post
with new versions of software, change is inevitable, if you aren't paying for it or contributing to it, then don't complain it isn't what you want, we can't always get everything we want ya know.
why not ?
 
Old 06-20-2011, 05:47 PM   #11
craigevil
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: OZ
Distribution: Debian Sid/RPIOS
Posts: 4,885
Blog Entries: 28

Rep: Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533Reputation: 533
Since Firefox 2.0 I have only lost 1 extension that I couldn't find a replacement for.
Personally I think Firefox rocks nothing else compares.

My Firefox Information

Last updated: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:40:59 GMT
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1

Extensions (enabled: 17, disabled: 3; total: 20)
Themes (3)
  • Default
  • Firefox B [selected]
  • Oxygen KDE [selected]

Plugins
  • Adobe Reader 9.4
  • DivX Browser Plug-In
  • Google Talk Plugin
  • Google Talk Plugin Video Accelerator
  • Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2 Plug-In Compatible
  • Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_26
  • mplayerplug-in is now gecko-mediaplayer 0.9.9.2
  • OpenOffice.org Plug-in
  • QuickTime Plug-in 7.6.4
  • RealPlayer 9
  • Shockwave Flash
  • Windows Media Player Plug-in

Screenshot of Firefox 4.0.1 , if I want to play with the Beta I will run Iceweasel 5.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/87/snapshot5k.png/
 
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 09:39 PM   #12
gentisle
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Distribution: LinuxMint, OpenBSD
Posts: 263

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 9
@mvanwey: I tried Sea Monkey, but didn't really like it. I don't remember what bothered me. Nice to know that version 5 is problematic.

@speck: I usually unzip the extension that quits working, edit the install.rdf file to make it version compatible, re-zip into the .xpi file, and that solves the issue. However, I wasn't as clear as I should have been. When I said FF4 wouldn't deal w/my choice of extensions, I meant that they took the statusbar away, all the other "real estate" in FF 3 and below, and that keeps the extensions from being visible - or at least where I like them. The problem is, FF4 is a la Microsoft, that is, after a version is successful, change the look around so users will be scratching their heads trying to figure out how to use it. I'm tired of having to learn a new version of software as if it's a completely new type of software. It's like buying a new car, and the steering wheel is in a different location each time. Sometimes on the roof, sometimes in the truck, sometimes under the hood, but each time, you have to re-learn how to drive. CRAZY!

@TobiSGD: I totally understand that, and that's why I edit the install.rdf as mentioned above, but I don't fault them at all. It's like I was telling speck. Who wants to learn to drive all over again each time they get a new car?
@KenJackson: I didn't say there were NO extensions, I said they don't work anymore. Meaning, they need the install.rdf edited so they will be version acceptable. Or that they are no longer visible because FF4 took all the statusbar, etc away.

@H_TeXMeX_H:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ;4390580
The bigger problem is that they keep changing the UI to make it more different and less usable, IMO.

It's true I don't like where FF is heading, but maybe someone will fork it and it will be saved.
This is what I meant, but I couldn't figure out how to say it! I agree 100%. If you understand everything, you must be God.

@Mr. Alex: I have not heard of Midori (except for the Japanese liquor), I'll have to try it.

@frieza: True, I shouldn't complain. I really was just looking for opinions and to see if other people didn't like where it was going. I really wish I had the programmer type mind and the time to learn a language so I could make it like I want. Unfortunately, I simply can't invest that kind of time into learning C++, Java, etc. Thanks 4 your perspective.

@craigevil: Again, sorry that my message was not clear. I can make almost all the extensions I like to load in FF4, but if I can't see them b/c the GUI has all those other info areas removed, it drives me nuts.

Thanks to all who answered.
 
Old 06-20-2011, 10:13 PM   #13
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
why not ?
Sorry, but serious? If you don't contribute, at least with your opinion, how should the developers know?
 
Old 06-20-2011, 10:39 PM   #14
almatic
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 547

Rep: Reputation: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by gentisle View Post
I can make almost all the extensions I like to load in FF4, but if I can't see them b/c the GUI has all those other info areas removed, it drives me nuts.
Come on. You can just right click somewhere in the button-bar. Then 'customize' and you can see the statusbar and pull the buttons you had placed there somewhere else. Also you can make new button bars and so on. Too many status bars are annoying and steal space for the content, that's why they removed it.

btw. it seems Firefox 5 is final now. It's far from being dead.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2011, 10:44 PM   #15
hedron
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Location: NYC
Distribution: Slackware64-multilib 15.0, SARPI, artix
Posts: 401

Rep: Reputation: 32
I don't really understand why they keep breaking all the extensions. I'm sure there's more going on then I can see, but even simple extensions like cs lite have been broken by ff4.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Microsoft Keeps Beating a Dead Browser DragonSlayer48DX Linux - News 1 07-04-2009 08:25 AM
LXer: Microsoft is dead - even if they don’t know it yet LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-10-2007 12:40 AM
LXer: Microsoft is Dead LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-07-2007 04:31 PM
tried to install g++...killed firefox SamerAdra Linux - Newbie 1 11-05-2004 10:44 PM
Firefox theme killed my firefox chrisknight Linux - Software 5 05-19-2004 11:26 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Software

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration