Linux - NewbieThis Linux forum is for members that are new to Linux.
Just starting out and have a question?
If it is not in the man pages or the how-to's this is the place!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
There is no resize option at all in the Suse partition manager? I've never used it personally, but I find that unlikely. Did you read the installation documentation? It should have covered this.
I described what happens when I use the resize option of Suse in post #9.
The installation of Suse 10.3 works perfectly fine.... as long as I do not want to change the size of the windows partition....
Looking at the 9th post, I don't see anywhere where it looks like you are trying to resize the partition, it looks like you are just trying to add another where there is no space for one.
Now the "expert partitioner" screen shows the following
sda 75Gb
sda1 27.2GB NFTS Windows/C
sda2 21.5GB extended
sda5 745MB F Linux swap swap
sda6 18.6GB F Linux native (ext3) /
sda7 2.1GB F Linux native (ext3) /home
/root isn't important, that is just where files are stored for the root user account, there shouldn't really be anything in there. / is where all of the OS will be, /home will be your personal user files.
I can't be 100% sure of anything if I'm not the one doing it, even then I can screw things up. I didn't see anything wrong in the partition table listed in your other post, as long as nothing has changed since then, everything should be fine.
2 GB isn't enough for /home. Since you are cramped for space, you might as well just create a swap and a (/) directory. Then /home will be a subdirectory instead of in it's own partition.
Well. I am afraid, I still am where I was before. Actually worse off...
Both Suse and XP work fine on the computer. A partition of an extra 21.5 GB has been created, as it says in Post 18 above.
But it has not been added to windows, it is simply also used by Linux.
XP again is reduced to only 27 GB.
This means, whenever I have another spare day, I can wipe the whole HDD clean and re-install XP and the whole stuff I need to go with it, again.
Somehow I fail to understand, why in the Suse set-up there comes a point where it asks me, if I want to use a new partition suggested by Suse, reducing the Windows XP partition to 27.3 GB. Yet, when I state no, then it is for some reason not possible to simply replace the number 27.3 with the number 60.... instead I have to go all possible re-arranging, which in the and will not work...
Well, thanks for trying, but... one Linux user less.
Upageya
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.