LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-01-2012, 08:30 PM   #1
jon44
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Smile Nikon ls-1000 (coolscan) Scanner Problem


Am struggling to install a recently aquired Nikon ls-1000 scanner. I made sure synaptic had downloaded all the xsane files. Am running PCLinusOs 2012.2 on main machine and PCLinux XFCE on other machine so parallel ports not recognized automatically.

In coolscan.conf I uncommented the line /dev/parport0, and in coolscan2.conf the line scsi: dev/parport0

I then checked the file dev/parport0 and noticed it is empty.

I tried this on both my Dell Veriton desktops - 2004 vintage. Each has one parallel port usually used for printer.

Xsane Scanning App could not locate the scanner.
No luck after various tweeks and attempts so I installed the trial version of Vuescan.

Vuescan had same problem - it could not find the scanner.

Any suggestions for getting this ancient but reputedly excellent device to work under linux would be much appreciated. Please bear in mind I'm a product of the modern user friendly linux interface, so not much good with compiling and terminals!
 
Old 11-01-2012, 10:24 PM   #2
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,175

Rep: Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784
Welcome to LinuxQuestions

According to all the information I could find on your scanner including the coolscan backend it uses a SCSI interface and not the parallel port. Are there different model numbers with different interface types?

To use this scanner you will need to acquire a SCSI card and I would recommend an Adaptec.

www.nikonusa.com/pdf/LS1000ug.pdf
http://linux.die.net/man/5/sane-coolscan
http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux

Last edited by michaelk; 11-01-2012 at 10:27 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 11-02-2012, 08:34 PM   #3
jon44
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Red face

Thanks Michaelk for sorting me out - I thought the 25 pin female connector I use for my printer was an scsi connector! I'll pick up a card and keep my fingers crossed. Can get an Adaptec on ebay.
 
Old 11-02-2012, 08:52 PM   #4
michaelk
Moderator
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,175

Rep: Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784Reputation: 784
Yes, some SCSI-1 connectors were 25 pin D connectors. Post back when you get a card installed and we can help you get configured if it does not get recognized.
 
Old 11-25-2012, 11:27 AM   #5
jon44
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2012
Posts: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Follow Up re. Nikon LS-1000 scanner

After installing my new Adaptec 2903B PCI SCSI Card ($9 from ebay), the LS-1000 immediately did everything it's supposed to without further configuration.

So far as getting a good scan - that was a different matter! Various sessions using the Xsane frontend yielded only two good slide scans which were in fact excellent in terms of sharpness and balance. For an amateur the interface seems so flaky and convoluted that I was unable to replicate these successes. All other scans are out of focus and bloom terribly. As the preview action ends, the so-far decent looking image suddenly becomes over everything - bright, contrast, saturation. No matter how I adjust the sliders, the ensuing full res scan is the same over everything, out of focus mess.

I also tried the free version of VueScan. This gave good results when it worked but most of the time it froze up. Admittedly my PC is somewhat ancient - Dell Veriton 7600G running PcLinuxOs KDE 2012.02.

Finally I accidentally discovered a sane frontend called Simple Scan. Simple it really is but the results were very acceptable after tweeking in Gimp. I don't think Simple Scan is doing the LS-1000 auto focus as Xsane and VueScan did, but I see almost no difference upon comparing the good samples I saved.

So I'll probably stick with Simple Scan for now but would much appreciate any hints for using Xsane from anyone who has come to terms with it.

Thanks.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to configure 1000 Base T ethernet card to send at 1000 Base T? trist007 Linux - Newbie 12 09-23-2009 01:59 AM
HP 1000 Problem oysterman Mandriva 4 12-01-2007 10:54 PM
Nikon D80 problem catonic Slackware 4 08-27-2007 09:15 AM
Problem connecting Nikon camera in debian tytono Linux - Newbie 6 09-16-2006 07:47 AM
Vuescan, Nikon Coolscan 5000ED USB Scanner, SuSE Linux64 AMD - trouble with timeout klaus_zinser Linux - Hardware 0 11-15-2004 10:12 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration