LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-08-2004, 09:55 PM   #1
geekzen
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada. The Great white north.
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 183

Rep: Reputation: 30
High idle cpu load in 2.6.4?


I compiled 2.6.4 a while ago, and i didnt really notice until today, when i had to boot back into 2.4.25 that 2.6.4 has a very high idle cpu load. Its very odd. The computer will be sitting there, and i'm getting about 5-10% cpu load. It will rest at nearly 0% on 2.4. Is this because of the way that the kernel reports cpu usage to gkrellm, or is it actually using more cpu....


If so, is this problem fixed in 2.6.5?
 
Old 04-09-2004, 01:31 AM   #2
AutOPSY
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: US
Distribution: Redhat 9 - Linux 2.6.3
Posts: 836

Rep: Reputation: 31
Im using kernel 2.6.3 with fluxbox on a 586/P75@100MHZ and 128 megs of ram. My cpu is idle at 0.9% mostly.

Your system is funky or you compiled
CFLAGS=HIGH_IDLE_CPU into your kernel somehow.
 
Old 04-09-2004, 01:56 PM   #3
geekzen
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada. The Great white north.
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 183

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Hmm... i'll; have to check for that flag. It just seems that all apps take more cpu when running under 2.6.4... i havent had a chance to boot 2.6.5 yet.
 
Old 04-09-2004, 11:09 PM   #4
shellcode
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 350

Rep: Reputation: 31
i686/P400. 128MB RDRAM. Kernel 2.6.3 Idle at about 3% (just running fluxbox).

my 2.4 kernel was idle at about 0% and this was annoying me for some time until i finally said fsck it and let it be because even though the idle cpu usage is higher, the 2.6 series is just plain faster. everything starts faster, runs faster. so if those 3% are the cost of greatly increased speed, so be it.

edit: hmmm, i could have sworn i didnt write "fsck"....
 
Old 04-10-2004, 11:54 AM   #5
geekzen
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Canada. The Great white north.
Distribution: Debian Sid
Posts: 183

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I've just been having a couple problems with 2.6, and was wondering if that was normal. My bet is that they changed the way the process read the used cpu time state.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why is my load average so high when comp. is idle? BrianK Linux - General 1 11-18-2005 12:25 AM
dm-crypt and high cpu load(pdflush) tazdevil77 Slackware 2 12-25-2004 02:03 PM
High load - but CPU 99% idle? Boss Hoss Linux - Hardware 6 05-24-2004 04:39 AM
Why am I getting ?high? CPU load? pnh73 Linux - General 15 10-21-2003 10:36 AM
Help! very high CPU load by squid cash_05 Linux - Networking 0 10-08-2003 07:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration