LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Desktop
User Name
Password
Linux - Desktop This forum is for the discussion of all Linux Software used in a desktop context.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-25-2011, 06:32 AM   #1
brazilnut
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 113

Rep: Reputation: 16
Best alternative to Gnome3


Why has my practical desktop that I use to do work with turned into a mobile phone?

If this is the route they are going I need an alternative who have aren't some kind of apple mac wanna be's... What is going on? I've been tweaking for 3 days now and there's still loads wrong and impracticable, never mind already being in legacy mode...


What is the best alternative for a non-trendy Wendy who just wants to do some work efficiently?
 
Old 06-25-2011, 06:41 AM   #2
Knightron
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Distribution: Slackware.
Posts: 1,324
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 157Reputation: 157
Sounds like you liked gnome 2.x maybe try xfce, it's a gtk2 application, so it'll seem some what similar to gnome 2.x
 
Old 06-25-2011, 06:54 AM   #3
brazilnut
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
I've got a friend who been trying to get me onto xfce for a number of years, but that's the opposite way, feels like win 3.1, but at the moment it is the primary option. I'll dl a live distro later and try KDE. It just feels like Gnome are trying to be awkward! Why?
 
Old 06-25-2011, 07:28 AM   #4
Snark1994
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Wales, UK
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,630
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345
It's a step in a completely different direction, but for productivity I find tiling window managers such as wmii unbeatable
 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:09 AM   #5
hamtavs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Italy,near Milan
Distribution: red hat 9
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 15
IMLE, desktops like Xfce and wmii lack integration or critical mass. you may need to use gnome or kde applications anyway to get a feature you need, with an up-to-date application, and they won't integrate with each other, but I'd be more than happy to be proved wrong.

I also find G3 to be a complete disaster for usability. It just doesn't make sense. I'm considering reinstalling gnome2, but I don't know how much it is feasible.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:14 AM   #6
liberalchrist
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: Clover, SC
Distribution: Slackware Current & FreeBSD
Posts: 120

Rep: Reputation: 24
Window Managers or DE's

If you want a different environment, you might consider LXDE. It's lightweight but fairly full-featured. If you want to keep a lot of the Gnome convenience, you could just run a different window manager on top (I prefer Fluxbox). E17 is another option, but it has never been very stable.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:33 AM   #7
rizzy
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 283

Rep: Reputation: 65
Desktop integration is best implemented in KDE. managing multiple widows probably best done by tiling WMs like awesomewm. So, have the best from both worlds and use kde+awesome. Personaly, gnome 2.3 + openbox does it for me.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:39 AM   #8
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,378

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
So none of you are aware of the classic / fallback mode for gnome 3??

The new model for gnone 3 might be different, but that doesn't make it bad. People are far too scared of change sometimes. Either way though, you don't need to be, as fallback mode is what you're after.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:45 AM   #9
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 15,438
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001
Quote:
Originally Posted by acid_kewpie View Post
So none of you are aware of the classic / fallback mode for gnome 3??
From the first post:
Quote:
never mind already being in legacy mode...
Quote:
People are far too scared of change sometimes.
Gnome 3 and Unity just aren't the way a desktop has to work for me (and others). It may work well on a netbook or a similar (small) device, but on my laptop and desktop I don't want to have that. XFCE with Xmonad works just fine for me. Has nothing to do with being scared at all.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-25-2011, 08:49 AM   #10
brazilnut
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
I'm already in fallback mode...

From deleting icons on panels, show desktop, that stupid clock, themes, etc, etc, and they are just basic cosmetics. My biggest fear is that the next revision won't have a fallback mode... If they are already thinking this is practical and acceptable, what's next?
 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:50 AM   #11
brazilnut
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by brazilnut View Post
...

what's next?
Google OS! LOL
 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:52 AM   #12
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,378

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
Fundamentally I think it's fascinating how so many people have slowly become so so used to the arbitrary way a system works that any radical change to that system is interpretted as a negative. For example, you're used to reacting against this when people stupidly complain that installing software in linux is so hard, without a setup.exe, when we all know it's normally significantly easier to install software under Linux compared to Windows. Mac users somehow manage to survive life with only one mouse button... aren't they dumb? Everyone knows you're meant to have 5...

---------- Post added 25-06-11 at 02:52 PM ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by brazilnut View Post
Google OS! LOL
You mean Chrome OS?

erm... LOL!
 
Old 06-25-2011, 09:17 AM   #13
hamtavs
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Italy,near Milan
Distribution: red hat 9
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by acid_kewpie View Post
So none of you are aware of the classic / fallback mode for gnome 3??

The new model for gnone 3 might be different, but that doesn't make it bad. People are far too scared of change sometimes. Either way though, you don't need to be, as fallback mode is what you're after.
I can use both straight and fallback mode. While the latter makes it easier to see menus and active applications, they still lack lots of functionalities that would allow for a more efficient use of the screen, like
  • a desktop area where to place documents, links and removable media. Currently the best you can get is the dock, with a severly reduced functionality,or have Nautilus manage the deskop, in which case you may get your old desktop after having started Nautilus. So, to get an icon on the screen you need to go first to menu>accessories>file first. hmm..
  • panels. The dock is cool but small and not easy to reach. Meanwhile the upper panel lays wasted.
  • to customize menus you have to manually edit a system-wide directory and write a .desktop file. Apart from usability issues, What happens with multpile users?
I don't know whether there's a way to achieve this better than the old one we're used to, but I know that G3 has no sensible way for it now.
 
Old 06-25-2011, 09:23 AM   #14
brazilnut
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 113

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by acid_kewpie View Post
...
You mean Chrome OS?

erm... LOL!

Probably...


You need to be online for most stuff to work! Just a fancy fašade... (never mind it's infancy issues, er, no printer drivers, only online printing!!! c'mon!)


I got into Linux because it was practical, now it appears to be competing against Windows or iThings, all about looking snazzy.

Without fallback mode, I couldn't have one window over another, the apps weren't even listed in way I could access them easily, you had to click on a menu before the whole screen faded out and images of each open window were overlayed, eh, I know what's open and I want access to it as easily as possible, not abstracting and obfuscating it away...

It's common for me to have my text editor open, maybe two consoles, filemanager and probably a browser, who wants to click a button and refocus to see what's available when you could just look up / down and see the choices laid out (as it was).
 
Old 06-25-2011, 11:30 AM   #15
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,378

Rep: Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963Reputation: 1963
You can't just alt tab??

Linux is NOT trying to "look flashy" if you think that's right you clearly don't understand what Linux even is. The Gnome Foundation might well be guilty of what you say, but that's Gnome, not Linux.

You regularly have 4 windows? Is that meant to be a lot??

So many of these things matter because you decide they matter. I couldn't care less what my wall paper or screensaver is. Menu organisation?? Now whilst this is a thing the gnome2 also lost when it first came out, and does seem odd to not have, I couldn't give a toss how the menus are laid out. These things are just not important. You're used to covering your desktop with five dozen pointless documents because that's simply what you're used to, not what makes you efficient. Things change. Move on, and realise how little these petty things actually matter. It's a great feeling to realise you don't give a stuff after all.

Many people also swear by using different workspaces. Personally I never bother, but it can be very simple knowing your browser is on top left, terminal on top right. Makes reaching them painfully simple with hotkeys.

Different != wrong.

Last edited by acid_kewpie; 06-25-2011 at 11:34 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] ubuntu 11.04 failed to load gnome3 malayo Ubuntu 7 11-01-2011 03:28 PM
So... Gnome3 ain't happenin' in Fedora14, is it? Raveolution Fedora 8 07-20-2011 09:25 AM
LXer: GNOME3 Notifications For Skype LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-05-2011 12:32 PM
Gnome3 - Problem creating hotkeys or keybindings that_one_guy Fedora 2 05-31-2011 05:54 PM
Gnome3 and Ubuntu 11.04 andy.l Ubuntu 1 03-15-2011 08:23 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration