LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices


View Poll Results: which system does linux represent?
socialism 4 26.67%
capitalism 0 0%
other (explain) 11 73.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-04-2007, 03:45 PM   #16
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,298
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

A dash of socialism (small "s"), a pinch of anarcho-syndicalism, a smattering of libertarianism, and two heaped tablespoons of pragmatism.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:49 PM   #17
Jorophose
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Distribution: Xubuntu 6.06!! =D
Posts: 137

Rep: Reputation: 15
Socialism, because everyone starts off at the same level playing field. (Older/Larger companies don't necessarily have a clear-cut advantage, only if they polish it)

Capitalism, because it encourages small distro companies. I wouldn't mind seeing a local distro in Ottawa. (Corel used to have one, and Xandros is still around but I don't like the way Xandros does things.)

But does it really matter at the end of the day?
 
Old 09-04-2007, 11:05 PM   #18
sickmint79
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 0

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by AceofSpades19 View Post
Open-source is neither capitalist nor socialism, because if were socialism, it wouldn't be called "Free" software, last time I checked socialism is pretty much the opposite of freedom, and its not capitalist because linux is not used for profit
sometimes it is, and there are plenty of non-profit organizations in a capitalist system.
 
Old 09-05-2007, 01:15 AM   #19
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
Quote:
Open-source is neither capitalist nor socialism, because if were socialism, it wouldn't be called "Free" software, last time I checked socialism is pretty much the opposite of freedom, and its not capitalist because linux is not used for profit
Here we go again, this has been discussed before (and the thread ended up closed purty soon by the way ).

Anyway, in a way Steve Balmer was right about calling Linux communist .He just took full advantage of the inherent ambiguity of the term. If you consider early socialism (a.k.a. Utopian Socialism) socialism/communism is essentially about freedom and personal development; control of the means of production was a means to that end. Ironically, it was the same ideal that inspired the free market ideology. But as with the latter, the relationship of means to ends got perverted. The means became the end and the original end got diluted into something that is quite nice to have - as long as it doesn't jar with the new one.

However you look at it, people like Richard Stallman may have a heavily political agenda but I'm sure that someone like Linus didn't give it much thought. For him it probably was just fun.
 
Old 09-06-2007, 08:30 PM   #20
iwasapenguin
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Posts: 110

Rep: Reputation: 15
Linux is organised anarchy.
We have a few simple laws* that are down to you to make sure that you live up to and if you don't then you're ganna' be drummed out of town.

Quote:
1: Be excellent to each other
2: Party on dudes
 
Old 09-06-2007, 10:45 PM   #21
AceofSpades19
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Chilliwack,BC.Canada
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,079

Rep: Reputation: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickmint79 View Post
sometimes it is, and there are plenty of non-profit organizations in a capitalist system.
no, they don't sell the linux kernel, they mostly sell support for it, or proprietary programs with it, no company has ever sold the actual kernel for money
 
Old 09-06-2007, 11:11 PM   #22
sickmint79
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 0

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by AceofSpades19 View Post
no, they don't sell the linux kernel, they mostly sell support for it, or proprietary programs with it, no company has ever sold the actual kernel for money
i didn't really intend this post to be concerned about the sale (or not) of linux or the various distros.

more of just the community; how is it produced, how is it changed, how is it used by the community.
 
Old 09-07-2007, 07:19 AM   #23
SlowCoder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Southeast, U.S.A.
Distribution: Debian based
Posts: 1,250

Rep: Reputation: 164Reputation: 164
How about "democracy", in it's pure definition? The freedom to "live your Linux" the way you want?
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linux Foundation Announces a Diverse Board of Directors to Represent the Linux Ecosystem LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-27-2007 11:01 PM
LXer: Represent KDE at Linuxtagen in Essen LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-25-2006 04:33 AM
how to represent int in binary system in Java? mac1234mac Programming 4 03-14-2006 07:11 AM
* should represent any characters suchi_s Programming 6 07-31-2004 03:50 PM
what does this c represent shanenin Linux - Software 3 10-14-2003 01:45 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration