LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Non-*NIX Forums > General
User Name
Password
General This forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!

Notices

View Poll Results: which system does linux represent?
socialism 4 26.67%
capitalism 0 0%
other (explain) 11 73.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-04-2007, 01:11 PM   #1
sickmint79
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 0

Rep: Reputation: 0
which system does linux represent?


i was having a discussion with someone the other day about politics. the topic of linux came up and what it represents. i am running a poll to see what the community thinks.

one viewpoint stated that linux is representative of socialism, as community users contribute to it and it is not run for profit.

the other viewpoint stated that linux is representative of capitalism, through the donation of time as charity to contribute to it.

what do you think? if other, please explain what. thanks!
 
Old 09-04-2007, 01:35 PM   #2
rshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,694

Rep: Reputation: 45
good gawd..

it's an operating system. nothing more, nothing less.

there are plenty of cults to join if you need that sort of thing.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 01:46 PM   #3
sickmint79
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 0

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
rshaw, i will be incredibly impressed if you can explain the logic you used to associate my question to cults.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 02:16 PM   #4
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickmint79 View Post
rshaw, i will be incredibly impressed if you can explain the logic you used to associate my question to cults.
I'll settle for just saying that this makes no sense. The various "isms" and "acies" are about government and economics, not technolgy development.

There is--I suppose--some connection. In pure socialism, you can imagine some bureacrat at least trying to bring Operating systems, the Internet, etc. under central control as--eg--a regulated publich utility.

One thing that was laughable was the statement attributed to Steve Ballmer that Linux was communist. Last I checked that meant central control---pretty much the antithesis of what Open-source is all about....

Last edited by pixellany; 09-04-2007 at 03:10 PM.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 02:19 PM   #5
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
central control is cultism ... ^_^


.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 02:50 PM   #6
ilikejam
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Glasgow
Distribution: Fedora / Solaris
Posts: 3,109

Rep: Reputation: 96
Other:

Linux (and other Free software) operates in a Gift Economy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economy
http://www.linux.com/articles/36554

Dave
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:01 PM   #7
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
Quote:
Originally Posted by alred View Post
central control is cultism ... ^_^.
Interesting stretch of definitions.....Maybe a bit better to say that extremism is a form of cult. The common denominator of course is individuals with a hyper-inflated self image.

This is fun but not necessarily relevant to the thread. But since the thread is not relevant to ANYTHING, maybe that's OK....
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:06 PM   #8
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
and i think linus he himself could be terribly flattered by this thread ...


//what the hell ... ^_^


.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:07 PM   #9
rshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,694

Rep: Reputation: 45
it made sense in my head at the time, but that ain't saying much.

it doesn't make a whole lot of sense unless you keep in mind the some in the "community" have a real problem with anything that is not 100% "free" . it is this zealotry that leads the casual user to equate linux == socialism. it's the same zealotry that attracts people that are prone to attach religious overtones to it."free is the 'one true' way" and wanting accelerated graphics on my nvidia card is some how a sin against the community.

(i want my stuff to work, and if i have to use ndiswrapper + a binary blob until a gpl'ed version is available, so be it)
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:11 PM   #10
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
I see that "other" is winning by a landslide. It really is the best answer for MANY questions......
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:22 PM   #11
sickmint79
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2007
Posts: 0

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
ilikejam, no time to read your response now but i am curious to read those when i get home.

fwiw i was arguing that it was more a product of capitalism, as no one is forcing me to contribute anything to better/use the product and people are donating their time to improve it.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:27 PM   #12
AceofSpades19
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Chilliwack,BC.Canada
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,079

Rep: Reputation: 57
Open-source is neither capitalist nor socialism, because if were socialism, it wouldn't be called "Free" software, last time I checked socialism is pretty much the opposite of freedom, and its not capitalist because linux is not used for profit
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:41 PM   #13
rshaw
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Perry, Iowa
Distribution: Mepis , Debian
Posts: 2,694

Rep: Reputation: 45
but it _can_ be used to generate profit if you want. redhat is doing alright with service/maintenance contracts. and the sky's the limit in the consulting field.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 03:47 PM   #14
alred
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: singapore
Distribution: puppy and Ubuntu and ... erh ... redhat(sort of) :( ... + the venerable bsd and solaris ^_^
Posts: 658
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 31
whatever it is ... really ...

but dont fall into that "gift economy"(i'm only translating that two words in my own head though) ... its terrible ...


.
 
Old 09-04-2007, 04:36 PM   #15
PTrenholme
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA, USA
Distribution: Fedora, (K)Ubuntu
Posts: 4,153

Rep: Reputation: 331Reputation: 331Reputation: 331Reputation: 331
Well, the Linux kernel is copyrighted by Linus Torvalds and others, and released under the GPL v. 2 license. Most other programs which use the kernel are also copyrighted and released on various versions of the GPL.

Thus development of Linux kernels and programs depends, at a basic level, on a political system which honors copyrights and enforces the rights of copyright holders to specify, and enforce, the license they grant to use their work.

Many -- but not all -- governments implement the standard "International Copyright Convention." Those that do not recognize the standard set of copyright holders rights and obligations have been both "capitalist" and "socialist." (e.g., South Africa and China.) Thus the assumption of your question, that the way a society handles copyrights is related to its political label, seems, to me, to be false on it face.

Conclusion: Your poll is flawed by invalid assumptions.

Observation: Most countries that "recognize" copyrights have laws that allow the country to "ignore" the copyright holder's rights in the "national interest." That observation is not too pertinent to Linux systems, since the GPL (and most other FOSS) licenses permit non-commercial use of the licensed material, so use in the "national interest" where the object is, presumably, not to make a profit, would not present a problem for Linux.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linux Foundation Announces a Diverse Board of Directors to Represent the Linux Ecosystem LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-28-2007 12:01 AM
LXer: Represent KDE at Linuxtagen in Essen LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 07-25-2006 05:33 AM
how to represent int in binary system in Java? mac1234mac Programming 4 03-14-2006 08:11 AM
* should represent any characters suchi_s Programming 6 07-31-2004 04:50 PM
what does this c represent shanenin Linux - Software 3 10-14-2003 02:45 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration