GeneralThis forum is for non-technical general discussion which can include both Linux and non-Linux topics. Have fun!
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
How hard is it to replace "daemon" with different terminology? I know someone who wants to use linux but won't because the term is immature and offensive to Christians. Would like it replaced using a different term such as "Demand", "Commander", "Service", "Process", etc. It'd be nice to replace other terminology to suit personal taste too.
you can say server process, but it has a slightly different meaning. Or background process. But he should be familiar with the original name, because it is the generally accepted and used expression. Those daemons are running also in Vatican.
How hard is it to replace "daemon" with different terminology?
Very hard, because you don't only have to change it in the kernel or system libraries, you also have to change it in the entire Unix/Linux documentation. The thing is that this name is used in more broad terms for at least 30-40 years now. People are used to it, so why should they change?
Quote:
I know someone who wants to use linux but won't because the term is immature and offensive to Christians.
Sorry I have to say that, but I think it is more immature to be offended by a technical term that has nothing to do with religion at all just because it sounds similar to a word of your religion and therefore rejecting from using an entire OS.
Think about it: If it really is offensive to your friend to use Linux because of the word daemon, then, even if (s)he uses Windows to avoid this situation, (s)he also has to avoid Google, Facebook and many other online-services. Android phones should not be used. Don't buy were there is Linux/BSD running on cash registers. Don't use navigation systems in your car. Don't rely on the weather forecast, it is most likely simulated on computers running Linux/BSD. You basically can't avoid to use a Linux/BSD system in your everyday life.
All of this just because a word (again, a technical term that is totally unrelated to your religion) is seen as offending. Better don't tell him/her that there is a 666 on every barcode out there.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TobiSGD
Better don't tell him/her that there is a 666 on every barcode out there.
Sadly that is not true: http://www.av1611.org/666/barcode.html (the first site I can across that debunks it, there are others.).
File permission are, of course, sometimes set to 666 though, technically, the number to avoid is 616.
Please note that, when OP reports that his friend says the term "daemon" is offensive to Christians, he is by no means speaking for all, or even most (or, indeed, for anything more than a very vocal fringe that delights in being offended by modernity) of the Christian community.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.