Yoper This forum is for the discussion of Yoper Linux. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
|
09-30-2006, 12:34 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Bodhi 3.0
Posts: 88
Rep:
|
Yoper is alive
Yoper is alive. Version 2.91 Blacksand is available to download. This is a Beta release so is still in testing. I strongly urge people who thought Yoper had died to check out the new release. It is faster than ever.
Lordtweety
Get the iso here
Last edited by lordtweety; 09-30-2006 at 12:36 PM.
|
|
|
10-01-2006, 05:05 AM
|
#2
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,318
|
Mmmmm - yoper lost me when they went with rpm.
rpm-hell induced me to switch to gentoo.
I tried yoper some time back, but sorry, no longer interested - Arch has my vote now where I need a (fast) binary distro.
|
|
|
10-01-2006, 05:23 AM
|
#3
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by syg00
Mmmmm - yoper lost me when they went with rpm.
rpm-hell induced me to switch to gentoo.
I tried yoper some time back, but sorry, no longer interested - Arch has my vote now where I need a (fast) binary distro.
|
I thought Yoper used apt4rpm so how would one have rpm hell?
|
|
|
10-01-2006, 05:33 AM
|
#4
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 21,318
|
Sorry - I should have been clearer.
rpm-hell was in my past (RH9 ???) - the scars persist. When yoper announced they were going that way I exitted stage-left.
|
|
|
10-02-2006, 10:26 AM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Sydney
Distribution: Bodhi 3.0
Posts: 88
Original Poster
Rep:
|
These days they are using Smart as the package manager. Installing new programs is a piece of cake.
Lordtweety
|
|
|
01-07-2007, 04:50 AM
|
#6
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: In A House
Distribution: mandrake slackware
Posts: 24
Rep:
|
Sorry, I gave up on yoper over a year ago.
It used to be a terrific distro, but its so old now that I have moved on. And yes it was a very fast distro. But their development team is slow, very slow, probably nonexistent by now. Sad really.
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 AM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|