[SOLVED] Can't use Updater due to automatic kernel upgrade
UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've got Ubuntu 14.04 Desktop ed. w/ kernel ver. 3.16 About a month ago I allowed the system to upgrade the kernel to ver. 4.xx, but after that I couldn't boot my system, so I re-installed everything from Clonezilla image and now I have again 3.16 It's all nice, but everyday I see this annoying upgrade proposal and what's even worse is that I think that I can't install any Ubuntu updates, since I get this kernel upgrade box and when I close it, then there's no update at all. You can take a look at those two print screens I've added.
I might suggest that you try a live media of the latest desktop from Ubuntu and see if you and run it. Basically one big issue is that the security support is out of date. Kind of defeats the point to not update.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
You could install the upgraded kernel then choose the older kernel from GRUB when you boot. I would hope that it is only the one kernel version that, for whatever reason, doesn't boot properly on your system and that the next may boot fine.
You can easily put in an exemption so that the package manager can run and install updates, but will NOT install a new kernel.
Alternatively, you could move to a distro that does not stab itself in the leg when updating the kernel. If you truly love Ubuntu, that may not be an option.
Explain - in detail.
Do you get a grub screen (do you normally) ?. What messages do you get if you get rid of the splash screen ?.
I have a dual boot system with W10. Also I've been having an issue with booting in general. 'cos usually I end up in BusyBox environment and don't even get to Ubuntu normal login screen. But after a reboot, everything goes back to normal. One explanation could be that my Ubuntu HDD is a USB3 external drive and it's not being called up properly right away. The HDD is kinda sleeping the first time and awakes after the reboot. And I couldn't find a solution that I could implement with my level of knowledge of Linux to solve this problem.
After I installed a new kernel version, that reboot solution stopped working and I simply didn't have Ubuntu, period. Actually, what's interesting is that I could get to a normal Ubuntu login screen, but after trying to login, I had a non-working system, so I had to shut down and turn on again my computer to do anything else.
You could install the upgraded kernel then choose the older kernel from GRUB when you boot. I would hope that it is only the one kernel version that, for whatever reason, doesn't boot properly on your system and that the next may boot fine.
To the best of my recollection, I tried that before and it didn't get me far. I think I could get to Ubuntu login screen (unlike with kernel 4.4), but then after the logging in, Ubuntu simply stopped working altogether, so my only option was to shut down the PC.
I don't know, but I'm having a feeling that I have t either try to upgrade to 16.04 and to see what might happen to my scripts side by side with PHP7 or just to live without updates for awhile. Possibly I could downgrade PHP7 to PHP5.5 in 16.04 env., but I'm not sure if that's a good idea in general.
You can add rootdelay to the kernel parameters to get around that "warm up" problem.
As for the other issue, I'm betting you do get into Ubuntu ok, but not X (the graphical interface). Boot up the install media (any version) and from a terminal run this and post the output (install inxi in need)
Have a read of this - a bit old, but looks ok.
Add (no quotes) "rootdelay=15" - if that doesn't work, up the number (of seconds). Note that just waiting in the grub menu should serve the same purpose - let the external spin up and settle.
Have a read of this - a bit old, but looks ok.
Add (no quotes) "rootdelay=15" - if that doesn't work, up the number (of seconds). Note that just waiting in the grub menu should serve the same purpose - let the external spin up and settle.
Thanks, I'll keep that in mind.
P.S. I downloaded and installed Synaptic, so I can manually update installed packages.
Took google 3 seconds to find, and it was the first in the results list. You may be able to do better.
In Synaptic, in a left pane I first choose what I want to upgrade, say, "World Wide Web" and then in an upper right pane I choose, say, Firefox. But I also see "Kernel and modules". There I see this:
"linux-generic-lts-utopic" and the verions (installed and latest, which in my case are the same, i.e., 3.16.0.77.68)
And this "linux-headers-generic-lts-utopic" with the same version as above.
So (if I understand it correctly), once a new version arrives, I would see it there and I can upgrade. Therefore I don't understand why should I be using a "Lock version" option at all?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.