Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just read Louis Gray’s post titled “On the Web, If You’re Not Growing, You’re Dying.” It gave me a chilling realization about web services. Like everything else, what goes up must come down. This must apply to Linux distributions too, right? So, what’s happening with Linux? Which distributions are growing? Like Louis Gray, I’m going to use data from Google Trends. People searching the name of Linux distributions on Google can be considered new users. After all, wouldn’t experienced Linux users already know where the websites of the big Linux distributions are?
People searching the name of Linux distributions on Google can be considered new users. After all, wouldn’t experienced Linux users already know where the websites of the big Linux distributions are?
This is why people should leave science to the professionals. Making assumptions like this only makes you look profoundly stupid. I'm sure I've read articles based on shoddier data and methodology, but I'll be damned if I can think of one right now.
complete ignorance....there is nothing else to say about it...
Why would anything happen to slackware or debian just because they aren't used as search terms?
There are a million reasons that Ubuntu may be used as a search term....trying to say it is only ONE reason is asinine.
Debian and slackware arent used as search terms (as the data shows) because they have such intelligent users that know everything about linux. (I can propose a illogical conclusion based on a faulty premise too)
If you go to a forum and ask for recommendations, members will often point you directly to the website - no search required. If you go in via distrowatch, the website is listed. Ubuntu is searched for because it is the hot name out there - it's everywhere and people will search for it.
On the other hand, Slackware and Debian, as the oldest of the distros, have always bubbled under. All this goes to show is that there is still no reliable way of proving which distro is most used or popular.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.