There is nothing wrong with a desktop system being user-friendly. It may be bad for a server OS, but not a desktop OS.
The only serious concern with Ubuntu is its simplified method of being able to play non-free codecs as opposed to being able to easily convert all non-free media to open standard codecs. I would really appreciate a GUI for doing that instead of having to write my own bash script that uses mplayer to do it. And I still can't figure out how to convert video to ogg theora.
Another criticism is that it makes installing non-free drivers and software easy. But unless the complaining people are helping with the development of 100% free, suitable replacements then they shouldn't complain about that.
The article seems a bit misleading about Ubuntu's security feature. Also, if the user prefers using difficult distros, that is fine, but there is no need to lament the fact that most ordinary users have no desire to browse the web with netcat and wget, or configure X server with vi while blindfolded or whatever.
Even so, the dominance of Ubuntu is far more desirable than the dominance of systems such OS X or Windows Vista.
Last edited by the_darkside_986; 09-25-2007 at 09:46 AM.
|