Post Slackware Install Kernel Panic Based on Inability to Read Partition Table
Slackware - InstallationThis forum is for the discussion of installation issues with Slackware.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Again, no, it does not do this when /sbin/installkernel is present. If there's no executeable /sbin/installkernel script it will do this, but I was explicitly referring to the case where /sbin/installkernel is present.
If you were talking about the case when no /sbin/installkernel script is present, then you shouldn't have done it in reply to my explanation of how to use the /sbin/installkernel script to speed things along.
But 'make install' will still work, whether or not YOUR script is present, correct?
Yes, but, again, this has nothing to do with my script, so it's not appropriate for you to quote what little documentation is necessary for it and cite that as if it were a problem with the script.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwwilson721
It is called a 'warning' for a reason.
In some circles it could also be called a non sequitur.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwwilson721
Let us assume they d/l your script, and copy it to /sbin.
Let us also assume that it does not get chmod to an executable.
Let us assume that they type 'make install' in the kernel source directory.
What happens then?
With the amount of momentum all those assumptions have built up, I figure there's probably room for still more assumptions.
We could just as easily assume that they might well be running these commands from /usr/src/mysql-4.1.19 and are wondering why they've got no vmlinuz file and the menuconfig target didn't work.
We could actually also assume that their house might be on fire, or at this very moment aliens may be poised above it in a cloaked starship, oiling up their new Probulator 3000, in which case a befouled kernel is soon to be the very least of their problems.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwwilson721
Take it as a warning, a just in case, a possibilty.
There was NO attempt to slight you, your script, or anything of the sort. Lighten up.
It was a warning. Just in case.
I do apologize that I did not make this clear ('make install' will work without your script, and the following results)in my first post.
However, it can, and does, happen.
Well then don't quote and highlight material that doesn't bear on what you're saying. The whole thing comes off as nearly mystifying, since the whole point of the /sbin/installkernel script is to keep a blind overwrite from happening (and to stop lilo whining about the lack of a -p).
Read the whole post. It is about compiling the kernel.
The OP wanted to compile their kernel.
I pointed out a possible pitfall.
You got all puckered up.
Read my sig about arrogance and perfection.
Lighten up.
Read the whole post. It is about compiling the kernel.
The OP wanted to compile their kernel.
I pointed out a possible pitfall.
You got all puckered up.
Read my sig about arrogance and perfection.
Lighten up.
You made a post that gave the appearance that what I was suggesting was flawed in a very specific way. You were wrong and you're too bull-headed to admit it. If you were merely posting a "warning" as you claim, there would have been no need to quote my post in the manner that you did.
Aaaaaand, peace out. Calm down people - this is a help forum not a hissy forum. I think we can all agree that we have been warned and then, if problems arise, we all know where to come for help with the problem.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.