SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I was wondering about Col-Panic's box too. Back then, I was running Slackware 11 on some PIII laptops and my AMD64 was running SLAMD64 11 so I could play with x86_64.
Location: Blue Mountains of NE Oregon, out on the Rez
Distribution: Slackware, Debian, Raspbian, Ubuntu
Posts: 15
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingbeowulf
Quote:
Originally Posted by damgar
It's a 64 bit version of Slackware 11?
I was wondering about Col-Panic's box too. Back then, I was running Slackware 11 on some PIII laptops and my AMD64 was running SLAMD64 11 so I could play with x86_64.
Yes, this one is a Slamd64 machine with a Xeon proc. Slamd64 11.0 reported itself as "Slackware 11.0.0 (x86_64)," whereas Fred changed it on subsequent versions to have an /etc/slamd64-version file that didn't call itself Slackware.
Yes, this one is a Slamd64 machine with a Xeon proc. Slamd64 11.0 reported itself as "Slackware 11.0.0 (x86_64)," whereas Fred changed it on subsequent versions to have an /etc/slamd64-version file that didn't call itself Slackware.
I have a couple of old Opterons still running that. Fred did some good work on Slamd64.
Sweet, another grsecurity-enhanced Slamd64 machine!
Yes I wonder a bit now as I found grsecurity through an "incident" since most of people are talking about SELinux and it's spread much wider, but it also is regularly exploited by Spender (the GRSec maintainer) to show that it's quite for nothing
Are people just silently using grsecurity and don't talk about it? (Maybe because it's that simple and easy to use)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.