SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
That is almost not possible. I suspect that for many of us, X won't even run until you configure it with xorgconfig. (It never has for me.) Then, unless you want to boot to the command line all the time, you need to change the default runlevel.
X has always worked "out of the box" for me, since 10.2 at least when I first started using Slack. Only time I have to do anything to xorg.conf is when I am updating the nvidia driver, fixing the wheel mouse and messing with compiz. And I prefer booting into the CLI, as was said before I do most of my administration there anyway.
Quote:
Once that is done, you have to add users, which is not part of the default setup (via the setup command),
Adding users is standard to any OS, and it's moot if you using the machine in a network environment where there will be central usernames and passwords.
Quote:
add Flash player for the browser,
I disable flash with flash block anyway, and usually you need to upgrade flash to get it working.
Quote:
set up a way to automount USB (since using the command line to mount and umount a USB device each time is not "plug and play"),
True, in pre-12.0 you had to edit fstab to add entries for USB, it was still easy to mount and open using your desktop browser. 12.0 uses HAL so plug-n-play is there, provided you add yourself to the plugdev group, which is a security feature.
Quote:
etc. Then, adding peripheral devices like a printer requires running CUPS. In other words, you need to configure a number of things after the installation. Someone coming from a PCLinuxOS background would not plan to see much of this except maybe printer setup.
Truthfully, everyone's ideas of a the perfect OS is subjective to their own POV. I prefer Slack precisely BECAUSE of the points you made. To me, it works like an OS should work, that is it runs your machine, and that's it. Slack leaves the administration in your hands, and doesn't hold your hand for you. That's the definition of the perfect OS, to me at least. When you try to do and be everything for everyone is when you run into behemoths that are bloated out of control and require massive amounts of resources, aka windows.
Unixfool [edit] and thekid [end edit] answered most of Cogar's points. Just a couple of additional comments.
1. Yes, you are right, you do have to add a user. I'll use this as an example of how Slack seems much easier than the gui-fied distros. To add that user you just need to run the command "adduser username". Not "Go to this control panel, choose this, click on that, etc."
2. You can choose to start cups or not in the setup.
[edit] Sorry, this has already been addressed
3. USB and other devices automount since Slack 12.
[end edit]
I have tried many distros. Started with SuSE 8.2 personal. I like Slackware. it does everything I need an operating system to do. Slack 12.0 is the best yet for me. In my case Slackware is a viable desktop system, and no-one ever asks me if my software is "Genuine", there are no product keys etc.
Recent Slackware convert here, after using Linux - SUSE, Zenwalk, Fedora - for 2 years. Slackware is sometimes frustrating because I have only a single machine and I may not have time to address an occasional issue or mistake of mine, but that's why I keep another distro installed.
I spend almost all my time in Slackware, happily.
Edit: changed backup distro
Last edited by AtomicAmish; 09-16-2007 at 06:33 AM.
I am thinking of installing slackware as a desktop OS, and I have a few questions.
How good is Slack on the desktop?
Is there an easy way to maintain packages? (eg synaptic)
Does it have multimedia support?
How is the support for peripheral devices?
How is the plug & play support?
Thanks for your advice.
Slackware excels on the desktop.
However, as previously mentioned it does need to be configured. You will need to be able to edit some text files and do some command line work.
I strongly recommend that you read the Slackbook before you install.
Slackware is the best version of Linux:-)
cd /root/sourceofwhateveryouwanttoinstallthatyoujustdownloaded
./configure
make
make install
Those last three lines should help you.
Slackware is the most stable and simplest linux distro in my opinion.The install is still a menu install really, just like fedora except that it does not look like the traditional menu.Once you get passed that and remember a few linux commands you're good to go.
It's an excellent desktop and I can still play a lot of games whether they have linux versions or not because wine works very well on Slackware as do most things and to top it off the Slackware forum here is a very helpful and worthwhile place to ask questions.
As others have pointed out that Slackware makes an excellent distro to use for the desktop of YOUR choice.
My desktop usage is limited. I use the cli most of the time. Only when I get real lazy do I fire up XFCE or KDE. Generally when I want to burn a lot of cds, I'll fire KDE for K3b.
Most of my work desktop is with XFCE and Firefox for the web. Support for 'vista/Xp' but that is selective on my part. My wife and other clients!
OSs' are tools that you can use as You need them. Not a religion as some seem to fall into that mode of thought. I do prefer my Slackware over any other but the world has a lot of people that choose others. Those are the people who never truly understand their system fully. And are the first to scream for HELP!
I suspect that for many of us, X won't even run until you configure it with xorgconfig.
I certainly (think) I had to run xorgconfig - however, I was working from a Slackware installation howto so maybe I just did it. Haven't had a chance to really play yet - it's actually a guest OS in Xen at the moment - but yes it's simple to set up and after I added a user fired up KDE just like I'm used to (.. where's the green chameleon gone?)
I certainly (think) I had to run xorgconfig - however, I was working from a Slackware installation howto so maybe I just did it. Haven't had a chance to really play yet - it's actually a guest OS in Xen at the moment - but yes it's simple to set up and after I added a user fired up KDE just like I'm used to (.. where's the green chameleon gone?)
On my latest Slackware installation I did not have to run xorgconfig to get KDE working. Unfortunately a lot of things were screwed up, so I had to run it anyway. I suggest doing it ahead of time.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.