LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-27-2003, 11:39 AM   #46
Astro
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Ballston Lake, NY
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 665

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30

I guess we can't get too awfully picky, I mean this is a minimalistic distro...don't want it looking like redhat or anything hehe that would be ugly, SCO might sue LOL
 
Old 08-27-2003, 01:03 PM   #47
linuxJaver
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Jakartax, ID
Distribution: slack9.1+,9.1,rh9
Posts: 203

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think java stuff can be considered heavy duty stuff ..

Microsoft makes for every thing its own proprietary solution (.net), actually not against but ms that hard, but ms goal is well to sadistic (that is to kill the existence of others ..)

Further more java has well etablated in embedded, mobile, portable devices/cards applications. I'd like slackware to be an ideal as development as well as runtime platform for java application ..

Sun has alliance with rh .., think sun should not forget to port their packages also for Slack next time ..

Is that not a good reason for mutualistic reflexive supporting ? In politic arena they look for common enemies to be united, but don't sun n slack have it .. ?

Actually sun java-sdk can also be let out or put in extra CD, but not the support. The bin-package in java.sun.com-download-site works well on slack ..

The support I meant is actually like to put all the needed libs for sun-thirdParty-colaborated-packages that only available in RPM-format like SunOneStudio, applicationServer/weblogic, ...

Just do a rpm2tgz on those will create tgz-packages but maybe without the install-scripts like those original slack-tgz-packages. That kind of script is also actually simple script e.g. for moving the extracted files somewhere on filessystem n maybe creating some symbolic links, that the easy stuff.

That can be managed by putting an whitePaper on the slackware-site .. The runtime probing experiment is actually wut I meant with the support, bcoz thing may not function caused of lacking of runtime libraries which is available in redhat but not in slackware ..
 
Old 08-27-2003, 01:33 PM   #48
jlangelier
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 95

Rep: Reputation: 15
A package for Gnucash.

I looked into installing it in slack, and it looks to be a nightmare with a need to install packages from Slack 8. It's such an ordeal there's even a mailing list dedicated to installing and running Gnucash under Slackware.
 
Old 08-27-2003, 05:05 PM   #49
Zb7
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Distribution: Slackware 9 (current), Gentoo 1.4, Redhat shrike
Posts: 86

Rep: Reputation: 15
Scrap Mozilla, and some of the other waste. OO.org is pretty big but if they could fit it, that'd be nice. I'd say since Slack is a champion of simplicity scrap GNOME and KDE (keep qt and gtk of course), and replace it with Fluxbox .

Also, some preset installations might be nice. Just to save time. Along with the "full" there'd be a "minimal" where it'd be nothing but everything you needed and maybe X. And definitely kernel source
 
Old 08-27-2003, 05:45 PM   #50
Kocil
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Redhat since 5.2, Slackware since 9.0, Vector since 4.0
Posts: 209

Rep: Reputation: 31
Scrap KDE and GNOME please.

Change it with XFCE4 and FluxBox.

(try the new XFCE4, you will be pleased).
 
Old 08-28-2003, 01:28 AM   #51
grym
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Distribution: Gentoo/Slackware/Debian/Mandrake
Posts: 285

Rep: Reputation: 30
swaret
gnucash
 
Old 08-28-2003, 03:50 AM   #52
320mb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577

Rep: Reputation: 48
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd rather have the kernel source than gnome
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Ya, me too..............
 
Old 08-28-2003, 09:05 AM   #53
cHarOn99
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
Lol 80 % of what you want is in my modified Slack cd

Gnome,Netscape and Mozilla out

Blackhaws Java included because Suns Java made Probs often
Opera and Phoenix with Java activated already also Flash 6 included, r-pppoe with gui, kernelsource, kde 3.1.3, mplayer incl codecs, kmplayer (mplayer frontend), k3b (burning), and many more oh and also nice foomatic included and wine with opengl support ;-)

I hate dependcies and i hope that Slack will never include it, because look at the fucking rpm systems with dependcies it is very bad, and i never had problems with dependcies under slack.

and what tha hell is E17 can someone give an link to it please.

greats cHarOn

Last edited by cHarOn99; 08-28-2003 at 09:08 AM.
 
Old 08-28-2003, 09:46 AM   #54
moojuece
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: mpls,mn
Distribution: Slackware,SuSE OpenExchange
Posts: 41

Rep: Reputation: 15
out with kde and gnome....out with emacs....add kernel source....these have already been mentioned...i am just listing as i have my custom cd setup....add gkrellm....this is an awesome tool that i have not seen any distro come with...why is this?? every linux use i know uses it.....oh yeah...the only WM needed is flux....also get rid of redundant tools....there only needs to be one text editor in a distro...etc....having multiple packages that do the same thing is kind of a waste....one email client one editor one WM one......fill in the blank...what would be really cool is if there slack site had some kind of menu where you could select what packages you used and it made a custom iso for you so if you were a minimalist you wouldnt have to d/l the whole thing...that would also be nice for dialup people....
 
Old 08-28-2003, 09:56 AM   #55
Moltag
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: 'Flori-duh,' US
Distribution: Slackware 9, RH 9
Posts: 33

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
The only thing I would LOVE to see is that the downloadable version of slackware ALWAYS stays on one disc.
Yup. I'd have to agree with Astro on this. Being a Red Hat veteran myself, having to download only one ISO instead of three was quite refreshing. Other than that, I'd just be satisfied if Slack had nicer FreeType support (the fonts in GNOME that shipped with Slack 9 look like the same blocky ones that shipped with GNOME 1.4, just antialiased). I had to install packages from Dropline to get the FreeType and X fonts all nice and clean looking.

Other than that, Slack's pretty solid and there's not much I'd like to see changed. As was stated earlier in the thread, Slack's harder to set up, but once it is, it doesn't let you down.
 
Old 08-28-2003, 10:36 AM   #56
grym
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Distribution: Gentoo/Slackware/Debian/Mandrake
Posts: 285

Rep: Reputation: 30
E17 == Enlightenment's next long awaited version (17)
 
Old 08-28-2003, 10:37 AM   #57
linuxJaver
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Jakartax, ID
Distribution: slack9.1+,9.1,rh9
Posts: 203

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think dependencies is surely an improve, but it is maybe not easy thing to do ..

I've once downloaded actual howto and manpages from tldp.org, I got problem to upgrade it, bcoz the package of that manpages is somehow splited in 2 slackware-pkg-packages by slack, and I just don't feel secure to replace that 2 slack-packages with the man*.tar.gz from tldp.org ..

That mean to be absolutely clean one has to wait that the packages be uploaded to slack-current first .. Well the content of that 2 packages may be tracked by /var/log/packages , but am just to silly to check wut inside them n to split that manpage-tgz into 2 ..

But can live also without dependencies check ..

Answered by me self:
check that 2 packages on /var/log/packages like "ls -la /var/log/packages/man*" then use removepkg to remove the 2 man-packages. Barely install the new downloaded man*-tarball, or create a new slack-tarball of it, have to check howto do that first ..

Last edited by linuxJaver; 10-24-2003 at 11:29 PM.
 
Old 08-29-2003, 12:34 PM   #58
Pres
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Australia
Distribution: Slack 9.1
Posts: 232

Rep: Reputation: 30
Fluxbox. It's no big deal to drop in yourself though. As for stuff to take out, well, I leave a whole lot out anyway. Not the kernel sources though, what was Patrick thinking ? That will never happen again I'm sure.

Ethereal. Tripwire. Chrootkit. I'm sure all this stuff was added in 9.0 though, one day perhaps I'll upgrade.
 
Old 09-04-2003, 06:49 PM   #59
h1tman
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Distribution: Slackware 11
Posts: 439

Rep: Reputation: 30
add dropline
 
Old 09-05-2003, 03:40 AM   #60
Noryungi
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: --> X <-- You are here.
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 305

Rep: Reputation: 53
Adding fuel to the fire...

If you want kernel source on the CD, I want KDE out, not Gnome.

I hope Slackware 10 (9.1?) will come with XFCE 4.

Having several security tools (somebody else mentioned Tripwire) would be good as well.

I would love it if Slackware came with several "rc.firewall" example files, so that one could study them and learn from them.

For instance:

example.rc.firewall: single machine, connected to Internet through a modem.

example.adsl.rc.firewall: single machine, connected to Internet through ADSL/Cable connection.

example.LAN.rc.firewall: gateway machine, used to connect other PCs to the Internet through ADSL.

example.PARANOID.rc.firewall: gateway machine (see above), with a highly paranoid firewall on it. Only outbound HTTP, HTTPS, POP3, SMTP allowed for instance.

As far as I know, this does not exist in Slackware... and it's a pain in the neck.

Just my US$ 0.02...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Look at what I managed to do today with slackware! cereal83 Slackware 22 04-01-2006 02:41 AM
Woo! Slackware 10.1 released today! CartersAdvocate Slackware 69 02-08-2005 07:39 PM
Slackware 10.0 RC1 Today Released!!!! cHarOn99 Slackware 4 06-16-2004 01:21 PM
4 quirks with Slackware. Ren Slackware 29 01-21-2004 03:20 PM
Slackware turns 10 years old today! Noryungi Slackware 16 07-20-2003 09:13 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration