LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 11-27-2005, 08:46 PM   #1
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 479

Rep: Reputation: 30
Look at what I managed to do today with slackware!


Hey all,

Well I upgraded my old 8-way server which worked perfectly on slackware 10.1 to a 16 way and when I run top, this is what I see. It's a IBM x445.


top - 19:26:34 up 1:50, 7 users, load average: 5.06, 5.23, 4.79
Tasks: 333 total, 3 running, 330 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 11.9% us, 14.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 7.9% id, 64.4% wa, 1.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu1 : 26.0% us, 29.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 42.0% id, 3.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu2 : 33.3% us, 32.4% sy, 0.0% ni, 28.4% id, 5.9% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu3 : 23.5% us, 2.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 57.8% id, 15.7% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu4 : 25.2% us, 6.8% sy, 0.0% ni, 65.0% id, 2.9% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu5 : 6.9% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 93.1% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu6 : 3.9% us, 1.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 95.1% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu7 : 9.9% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 90.1% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu8 : 1.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu9 : 1.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu10 : 4.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 96.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu11 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu12 : 4.9% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 95.1% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu13 : 1.0% us, 1.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 98.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu14 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu15 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu16 : 9.9% us, 6.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 60.4% id, 22.8% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu17 : 19.6% us, 1.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 79.4% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu18 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.0% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu19 : 3.9% us, 2.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 83.3% id, 9.8% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu20 : 1.0% us, 1.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 98.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu21 : 0.0% us, 1.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu22 : 0.0% us, 1.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 98.0% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu23 : 0.0% us, 2.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 97.0% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu24 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.0% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu25 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu26 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu27 : 3.9% us, 5.9% sy, 0.0% ni, 90.2% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu28 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.0% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu29 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu30 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 99.0% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Cpu31 : 0.0% us, 0.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 100.0% id, 0.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% si
Mem: 52003920k total, 3693696k used, 48310224k free, 287764k buffers
Swap: 1024120k total, 0k used, 1024120k free, 3049596k cached


I am very excited to see how it performs tomorrow under load.




You guys like it?

Soon we might be getting a IBM x460 in a 32 way. I can't wait for that either.


 
Old 11-27-2005, 11:04 PM   #2
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
So .. what was the point of this exercise? Flashing?
"Look at me! Look at me!" :}


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 11-28-2005, 07:23 AM   #3
lockout
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Riga, LV
Distribution: Slackware/Gentoo
Posts: 26

Rep: Reputation: 15
Soo0o0oo0OO....
Any conclusions of that cereal83?

:^)
 
Old 11-28-2005, 08:16 AM   #4
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 479

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by Tinkster
So .. what was the point of this exercise? Flashing?
"Look at me! Look at me!" :}


Cheers,
Tink
Exactly, I also wanted to show people what can be done with Slackware.

$300 000 server and Slackware 10.1

Thats cool in my books!
 
Old 11-28-2005, 08:30 AM   #5
Bruce Hill
HCL Maintainer
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: McCalla, AL, USA
Distribution: Gentoo on headless; Arch on everything that requires a GUI
Posts: 6,941

Rep: Reputation: 137Reputation: 137
Quote:
Originally posted by cereal83
Exactly, I also wanted to show people what can be done with Slackware.

$300 000 server and Slackware 10.1

Thats cool in my books!
You spend three hundred thousand dollars on a Linux server?
 
Old 11-28-2005, 09:27 AM   #6
Randall Slack
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Distribution: Debian - Ubuntu
Posts: 219

Rep: Reputation: 30
mmmmm i spent E300,- on my server with Slack!
and it performs pretty well, what is your's supposed to do?
 
Old 11-28-2005, 09:35 AM   #7
Nobber
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Distribution: Debian (home), Kubuntu 7.04 (work)
Posts: 265

Rep: Reputation: 30
A machine like that is wasted as a server. I'd put it on my desktop and enable all the flashy GUI effects pronto!
 
Old 11-28-2005, 09:40 AM   #8
raska
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Aguascalientes, AGS. Mexico.
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 kernel 2.6.29.6
Posts: 816

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally posted by Nobber
A machine like that is wasted as a server. I'd put it on my desktop and enable all the flashy GUI effects pronto!
yup, or you can play Doom3, UT2004 or the upcoming UT2007 like there were no tomorrow!

That's such an expensive machine! Hope you also have installed a big-really-freaking-huge ERP system and a decently-huge-with-at-least-a-coupe-of-Terabytes database with thousands of users or all that machinepower is wasted
 
Old 11-28-2005, 11:28 AM   #9
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
Quote:
Originally posted by cereal83
Exactly, I also wanted to show people what can be done with Slackware.

$300 000 server and Slackware 10.1

Thats cool in my books!
Sorry to disappoint you, but that's a kernel feature, any distro
will do that (provided the kernel is new enough, so comparing
to DeadRat 7 wouldn't be fair). That Slack can too to me is only
natural.

Anyway, what kind of business do you own to require such a
box? :)


Cheers,
Tink

Last edited by Tinkster; 11-28-2005 at 11:29 AM.
 
Old 11-28-2005, 12:18 PM   #10
ringwraith
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Slackware 15.0
Posts: 1,273

Rep: Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally posted by Tinkster

Anyway, what kind of business do you own to require such a
box?
Pr0n server?
 
Old 11-29-2005, 06:32 AM   #11
cereal83
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 479

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
The server is not a waste. Thousands of people use it. It's a server that certain banks use to mange people who owe them money.

I know any distro would probably work but I use slackware.

We have over a terabyte of space as we have 16x146 SCSI hard drives for it but I think the database is only about 600 gigs. We run php, apache and my sql the most on it.

I don't think the server is a waste because now it takes 1 seconds to load the stuff it has to as before it took about 10 seconds.

First day was rough. Load average went up to about 51 at certain times of the day so I worked late and tweaked with it a bit to see how it will run today.

BTW, my company did spend that much on a server but we need the horsepower it provides.
 
Old 11-29-2005, 06:38 AM   #12
GlowGlow
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 111

Rep: Reputation: 15
It shows that Slack is perfect for bussiness use, in contrast to what some articles have be claiming without much basis.

Nice job!
 
Old 11-29-2005, 07:56 AM   #13
Nobber
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Nova Scotia
Distribution: Debian (home), Kubuntu 7.04 (work)
Posts: 265

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by cereal83
The server is not a waste.
I was only joking. Well, half-joking.
 
Old 11-29-2005, 11:30 AM   #14
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: earth
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 23,067
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928Reputation: 928
Quote:
Originally posted by cereal83
Hey all,

Well I upgraded my old 8-way server which worked perfectly on slackware 10.1 to a 16 way and when I run top, this is what I see. It's a IBM x445.

Quote:
Originally posted by cereal83
The server is not a waste. Thousands of people use it. It's a server that certain banks use to mange people who owe them money.

I know any distro would probably work but I use slackware.

We have over a terabyte of space as we have 16x146 SCSI hard drives for it but I think the database is only about 600 gigs. We run php, apache and my sql the most on it.

I don't think the server is a waste because now it takes 1 seconds to load the stuff it has to as before it took about 10 seconds.

First day was rough. Load average went up to about 51 at certain times of the day so I worked late and tweaked with it a bit to see how it will run today.

BTW, my company did spend that much on a server but we need the horsepower it provides.

Hmmmm ... which is it now, a companies server, your server, or
do you own the company? :}

Btw, the company I work for recently purchased a SAN with
28 FC HDDs ;} for their Oracle database...



Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 11-29-2005, 03:55 PM   #15
Yalla-One
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Norway
Distribution: Slackware, CentOS
Posts: 641

Rep: Reputation: 36
I seem to recall an old post asking for references on who used Slackware for commercial purposes - would you mind writing up a quick business case for _why_ you chose Slackware as your distribution for this business critical server, how it performs, and outline some of your experiences?

With all the forks off Slackware and the recent battering it took in a review ("Does Slackware still matter?" article), it'd be most beneficial if the community could come up with a set of reference cases to clearly demonstrate the strengths of Slackware.

Investing $300k in a server to run Slackware on seems like a (too good to be true) business case...

-Y1
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware current updates today! neo Slackware 2 04-22-2005 05:32 PM
Woo! Slackware 10.1 released today! CartersAdvocate Slackware 69 02-08-2005 07:39 PM
Slackware 10.0 RC1 Today Released!!!! cHarOn99 Slackware 4 06-16-2004 01:21 PM
Slackware Quirks -- What do you want to see today? Astro Slackware 75 10-24-2003 09:38 AM
Slackware turns 10 years old today! Noryungi Slackware 16 07-20-2003 09:13 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration