LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2007, 11:42 PM   #1
forrest44
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the staple gun
Distribution: slackware4life
Posts: 119

Rep: Reputation: 15
slackware-current


New gcc,
New x.org,
etc etc etc

What do you think?
Will it bring greater performance to older hardware?
 
Old 04-02-2007, 12:27 AM   #2
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
Probably not. Old hardware will probably cripple any newfound power introduced by the changes.
 
Old 04-02-2007, 12:30 AM   #3
forrest44
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the staple gun
Distribution: slackware4life
Posts: 119

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
In my experience the change from GCC 3.3 to 3.4 has definately been an improvement on my older hardware, along with newer KDE releases, etc

Do you think GCC 4 and the new toolcahins, etc will be faster than what was in slackware 11?
 
Old 04-02-2007, 12:32 AM   #4
GrapefruiTgirl
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556Reputation: 556
Hmm, well that is definitely good news in your case .. In general, GCC4 will *probably* be more efficient, if not exactly 'faster', but the 2 like to go hand in hand, so.. Hopefully..
I think it has the potential, yes.
 
Old 04-02-2007, 02:51 AM   #5
MS3FGX
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361
Unlike the Microsoft world, newer software doesn't mean you need newer hardware. My machines perform much faster running the 2.6 kernel than the 2.4, even my machines down to ~100 Mhz, for example.

The new software introduced will increase system efficiency in a number of areas, but some changes are really just changes in how the software is packaged.

That said, Slackware is clearly moving away from the old-hardware friendly stance it has had in the past to keep up with the demands of the modern Linux community. You will obviously still be able to run Slackware on nearly any machine, but that is going to become less of a concern for Patrick in it's overall development.
 
Old 04-02-2007, 12:48 PM   #6
GamerX
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 102

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
If you're using xfce then you definitely want to upgrade to 4.2.0 -> 4.4.0. I can't say for certain how it does with old hardware, but it's a major improvement on the user end. Thunar is just leaps and bounds better than the previous file manager and mousepad is my new favorite text editor (but I still use Eclipse for coding).

I just "slackpgk upgrade-all" but it wasn't as smooth as I imagined it would be (still beats downloading 50 packages by hand!). The split 'which' package caught me, still getting some odd errors here and there, but the new X (+fxce) worked right off the bat which is good. At least I can use FF (officially upgraded to 2.0.0.3 btw).

Overall I'd say the update was definitely due.
 
Old 04-02-2007, 06:41 PM   #7
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,462
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561
Quote:
Originally Posted by MS3FGX
Unlike the Microsoft world, newer software doesn't mean you need newer hardware. My machines perform much faster running the 2.6 kernel than the 2.4, even my machines down to ~100 Mhz, for example.
...
That said, Slackware is clearly moving away from the old-hardware friendly stance it has had in the past to keep up with the demands of the modern Linux community. You will obviously still be able to run Slackware on nearly any machine, but that is going to become less of a concern for Patrick in it's overall development.
I'm confused.

You say that 2.6 runs better on your old hardware, yet you think that Slackware is "clearly moving away from the old-hardware friendly stance"... ??

I don't know why you would think that, but I would guess that it's because Pat is finally going to drop support for the 2.4.x line of kernels. This move will take more advantage of the features offered by 2.6.x.

Please clarify.
 
Old 04-02-2007, 09:45 PM   #8
forrest44
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: In the staple gun
Distribution: slackware4life
Posts: 119

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Please clarify.
2.6 runs fine on my older hardware (Pentiums, etc)

MS3FGX said "That said, Slackware is clearly moving away from the old-hardware friendly stance"

Is it?
 
Old 04-02-2007, 10:00 PM   #9
rkelsen
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 4,462
Blog Entries: 7

Rep: Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561Reputation: 2561
Quote:
Originally Posted by forrest44
Is it?
I don't believe it is, which is why I have asked MS3FGX to clarify the point.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware-Current AlleyTrotter Slackware 10 03-01-2007 12:22 PM
DISCUSSION: Upgrade to Slackware -current without a -current CD truthfatal LinuxAnswers Discussion 0 09-19-2006 01:42 PM
Slackware Current versus Slackware 10.2 davimint Slackware 3 07-26-2006 03:52 PM
slackware 8.1 iso vs slackware current illtbagu Slackware 9 02-26-2003 07:10 PM
New slackware-current... taz.devil Linux - General 7 12-03-2001 05:31 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration