SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Hmm, well that is definitely good news in your case .. In general, GCC4 will *probably* be more efficient, if not exactly 'faster', but the 2 like to go hand in hand, so.. Hopefully..
I think it has the potential, yes.
Unlike the Microsoft world, newer software doesn't mean you need newer hardware. My machines perform much faster running the 2.6 kernel than the 2.4, even my machines down to ~100 Mhz, for example.
The new software introduced will increase system efficiency in a number of areas, but some changes are really just changes in how the software is packaged.
That said, Slackware is clearly moving away from the old-hardware friendly stance it has had in the past to keep up with the demands of the modern Linux community. You will obviously still be able to run Slackware on nearly any machine, but that is going to become less of a concern for Patrick in it's overall development.
If you're using xfce then you definitely want to upgrade to 4.2.0 -> 4.4.0. I can't say for certain how it does with old hardware, but it's a major improvement on the user end. Thunar is just leaps and bounds better than the previous file manager and mousepad is my new favorite text editor (but I still use Eclipse for coding).
I just "slackpgk upgrade-all" but it wasn't as smooth as I imagined it would be (still beats downloading 50 packages by hand!). The split 'which' package caught me, still getting some odd errors here and there, but the new X (+fxce) worked right off the bat which is good. At least I can use FF (officially upgraded to 2.0.0.3 btw).
Unlike the Microsoft world, newer software doesn't mean you need newer hardware. My machines perform much faster running the 2.6 kernel than the 2.4, even my machines down to ~100 Mhz, for example.
...
That said, Slackware is clearly moving away from the old-hardware friendly stance it has had in the past to keep up with the demands of the modern Linux community. You will obviously still be able to run Slackware on nearly any machine, but that is going to become less of a concern for Patrick in it's overall development.
I'm confused.
You say that 2.6 runs better on your old hardware, yet you think that Slackware is "clearly moving away from the old-hardware friendly stance"... ??
I don't know why you would think that, but I would guess that it's because Pat is finally going to drop support for the 2.4.x line of kernels. This move will take more advantage of the features offered by 2.6.x.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.