LinuxQuestions.org
Latest LQ Deal: Latest LQ Deals
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-15-2007, 09:34 AM   #16
pdw_hu
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Distribution: Slackware, Gentoo
Posts: 346

Rep: Reputation: Disabled

Quote:
Originally Posted by hikarutilmitt
It's too bad we couldn't get this with Xorg 7.3 like was supposedly wanted, but I think having 7.2 is plenty.
We do have Xorg 7.3. Or does it being a pre-,beta whatever doesn't count?
 
Old 06-15-2007, 10:39 AM   #17
Road_map
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 341

Rep: Reputation: 31
Code:
kompare -c ftp://slackware.cs.utah.edu/pub/slackware/slackware-11.0/FILELIST.TXT ftp://slackware.cs.utah.edu/pub/slackware/slackware-current/FILELIST.TXT
Quote:
Statistics:
Old file: kompare4eXpja.tmp
New file: kompareZc1X1b.tmp
Format: Unified
Number of hunks: 83
Number of differences: 225
Discover the hunks and differences!
 
Old 06-15-2007, 12:23 PM   #18
drumz
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 906

Rep: Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697
Does anyone know if there are any good reasons flac is still and 1.1.2, even though 1.1.4 is available?
 
Old 06-15-2007, 12:55 PM   #19
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumz
Does anyone know if there are any good reasons flac is still and 1.1.2, even though 1.1.4 is available?
Several applications in Slackware that are linked to the flac libraries are not ready yet for this version. The waiting is for these apps to be adapted to the new major library version.
Juk, and possibly libtunepimp and libmusicbrainz are affected.

Eric
 
Old 06-15-2007, 01:03 PM   #20
Fluggo
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
Code:
	Slackware CDROM set Subscription, starting with 11.0 	29.95 	Add to Cart

	Slackware DVD Subscription, starting with 11.0 	        39.95 	Add to Cart
Waiting for the slackstore to be updated so I can buy a subscription...
 
Old 06-15-2007, 01:21 PM   #21
drumz
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 906

Rep: Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697Reputation: 697
Thanks Eric. I just read read the changelog for flac and it looked like quite a few changes.
 
Old 06-15-2007, 02:33 PM   #22
hikarutilmitt
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX
Distribution: Slackware 11.0 and SLAMD64 11.0
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdw_hu
We do have Xorg 7.3. Or does it being a pre-,beta whatever doesn't count?
AFAIK the -current entry on Distrowatch shows 7.3 but 7.3 isn't out until August. I was under the impression before that Pat was waiting for 7.3 to come out before finishing up and doing the RC routine, but since 7.3 got pushed back to August (was previously May) I figured that he'd just be using the stable 7.2 and go on with the RC, maybe leaving 7.3 as an update or new (sub)version (12.1).

Then the entry on Distrowatch announcing the 12.0RC1 specifically says 7.2, but who knows if that's right (I'd assume it is).
 
Old 06-15-2007, 03:08 PM   #23
gargamel
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Slackware, OpenSuSE
Posts: 1,839

Rep: Reputation: 242Reputation: 242Reputation: 242
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
Several applications in Slackware that are linked to the flac libraries are not ready yet for this version. The waiting is for these apps to be adapted to the new major library version.
Juk, and possibly libtunepimp and libmusicbrainz are affected.

Eric

And that's what makes Slackware so good: It is so well maintained by some people who really check all this so that the rest of us just can lay back and just depend on a consistent system that simply works!

Keep up the excellent work!

gargamel
 
Old 06-15-2007, 03:53 PM   #24
msantinho
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lisbon
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 17
Quote:
The only reason for a jump to 12, rather than 11.1 is most likely due to three things: 2.6 default kernel now, hal, and dbus. Or is there something else too?
For me there is 'something else' like Apache 2.2. We've some tenths of web sites using Apache 1.3.* with mod_perl on two web servers. We've been reviewing the code (mainly Perl) since Pat moved httpd to n/ in -current. Not that we're having problems, but it's a lot of _not_ planned effort to do this year. Oh well, life is all about challenges. :-)

Of course, our desktops will have a better look. But does it really matter? After all, everything is working very well. Maybe we're going to delay the move until the end of the year. We'll see.

Last edited by msantinho; 06-15-2007 at 03:54 PM.
 
Old 06-15-2007, 05:42 PM   #25
Anonymo
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: The Woodlands, Texas
Distribution: Slackware, Archlinux, CentOS
Posts: 196

Rep: Reputation: 40
I am very excited about this release and am going to probably wait for a later RC or maybe the final so that I download the DVD only once and share it forever and ever on bittorrent. This is sounding like one of the best releases I have ever heard of. The fork distros are going to be great as well. I want to try a new dracolinux release based on this.
 
Old 06-15-2007, 07:18 PM   #26
StarsAndBars14
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Tennessee
Distribution: Fedora Core 12
Posts: 49

Rep: Reputation: 15
Yay, I hope the KDE will be PAM enabled.
 
Old 06-15-2007, 09:47 PM   #27
Z038
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 912

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 174Reputation: 174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluggo
Code:
	Slackware CDROM set Subscription, starting with 11.0 	29.95 	Add to Cart

	Slackware DVD Subscription, starting with 11.0 	        39.95 	Add to Cart
Waiting for the slackstore to be updated so I can buy a subscription...
Yep, I discovered the same thing. I want to support Slackware with a subscription, but I already bought 11.0 DVD last year during the pre-sale, so I want to sign up on the subscription when 12.0 becomes an option.
 
Old 06-16-2007, 01:34 AM   #28
erklaerbaer
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Posts: 381

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarsAndBars14
Yay, I hope the KDE will be PAM enabled.
it won't. but there is HAL, which unfortunately is only one third as good (.A.)...
 
Old 06-16-2007, 04:12 AM   #29
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymo
I am very excited about this release and am going to probably wait for a later RC or maybe the final so that I download the DVD only once and share it forever and ever on bittorrent. This is sounding like one of the best releases I have ever heard of. The fork distros are going to be great as well. I want to try a new dracolinux release based on this.
A "fork distro" is a distro that at one point in time decides to use another distro as it's base and from that point on becomes an independant distro and makes it's own decisions in how that distro must evolve. The parent distro and the fork will grow apart more and more over time.

The distros you are referring to are what should be called "vulture distros" since all they do is wait for Slackware to evolve, then pick the cherries out of the new releases and re-stamp it with their own extensions. This is basically letting someone else do the dirty work for you because you're too lame to think for yourself.

My two cents.
Eric
 
Old 06-16-2007, 04:58 AM   #30
msantinho
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lisbon
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 17
Quote:
This is basically letting someone else do the dirty work for you because you're too lame to think for yourself.
I think that's not a fair comment. Guys on Slax - I don't know the others - have been doing a great work there. Their LiveCD really helps (me) to show somethings Linux can do and how it looks like. If customers go serious about moving to Linux, then Slackware comes as a solution. A LiveCD is usefull - at least to me; if it is based on Slackware than that's better.

Last edited by msantinho; 06-16-2007 at 05:04 AM.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: DistroWatch in 2006, MEPIS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD and RHEL release updates LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-01-2007 03:54 AM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: Mandriva Linux 2007, Extracting package lists, DistroWatch in Middle East LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 09-18-2006 05:21 AM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: SUSE 10.1 RC1, Arch64, Linux in Japan LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-17-2006 04:21 AM
LXer: DistroWatch Weekly: DistroWatch meets Mark Shuttleworth LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-20-2006 03:16 AM
Slackware commentary on DistroWatch dhave Slackware 3 01-25-2005 03:00 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration