SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
As said, have just tested the latest release 0.3.6 which depends on libswscale and not sure if it is worth including this driver if you have to install ffmpeg also. But from the latest commits it looks like this dependency has been removed, maybe i'll give git a try.
Just compiled latest git and there does not seem to be any dependency to ffmpeg anymore. Besides the documentation there is only one library file and one symbolic link to it included in the package.
Thx to bassmadrigal for the clarification. The ArchWiki has similar information
Quote:
AMD Radeon HD 4000 series and newer GPUs are supported by the libvdpau-va-gl package together with the libva-xvba-driver package.
OK, the libva-xvba-driver is not yet included in -current so these GPUs might not be able to use VDPAU? Maybe then it is really not worth adding it just to make some intel users happy. No problem, sorry for the noise.
OK, the libva-xvba-driver is not yet included in -current so these GPUs might not be able to use VDPAU? Maybe then it is really not worth adding it just to make some intel users happy. No problem, sorry for the noise.
Based on my previous research (although, this was DEC of 2014, so it might be a bit dated), the XvBA support was only provided with the binary radeon driver. Initially, it was in competition with VDPAU and VA-API, however, the libva-xvba-driver was created that allowed it to work with software that supported VA-API. Then, in conjunction with libvdpau_va_gl, it could be made to work with software supporting only VDPAU. However, at that point, you're transitioning between 3 systems, and the performance hit was substantial on VDPAU, so it was generally recommended to to try to stick with VA-API (since most software didn't support XvBA natively). Luckily, the semi-recent opensource drivers (for the past year and a half or so) supports VDPAU out of the box, as do the really recent AMDGPU (both the opensource and proprietary components), so no wrappers are needed.
Long story short (if I am understanding it all correctly)... libva-xvba-driver might only be needed when using the older, non-amdgpu, proprietary AMD driver. VDPAU is used on all other hardware other than Intel, which uses VA-API. Intel owners could use libvdpau_va_gl to add acceleration for Intel hardware with VDPAU-only software.
If I remember correctly, it is primarily Intel hardware, however, I believe the older versions of AMD's proprietary driver use it (I believe anything based on the newer amdgpu driver uses vdpau). Nvidia (proprietary and opensource) and Radeon (opensource radeon and opensource/proprietary amdgpu) use vdpau.
That's correct, it could be used by catalyst together with xvba-va-driver but catalyst is more or less dead and doesn't support current.
The overhead of the translations thru all layers will take away most of the winnings on catalyst so there never really were any real use for it on AMD hardware. and i think it's a horror story by it self if you look at what actually happens.
That leaves Intel as the only driver that use it.
I think SBo is the right place for it or maybe extra but i think SBo is better.
Last edited by Nille_kungen; 05-03-2016 at 02:13 PM.
i try to compil the new pyqt-5.6 and he is looking this dbus-arch-deps.h include in /usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/ not on /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include/dbus/
i try to compil the new pyqt-5.6 and he is looking this dbus-arch-deps.h include in /usr/include/dbus-1.0/dbus/ not on /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include/dbus/
Looks like a bug in pyqt, ArchLinux seem to have a fix for that (not tested), have a look at the sed-command in the PKGBUILD here. Might be worth a try (you have to adjust the location of the configure.py script for the sed-command). Might be fixed in next release according to the bugreport.
Last edited by DarkVision; 05-04-2016 at 03:35 PM.
Version 5.32, 2016.05.03, urgency: HIGH
* Security bugfixes
- OpenSSL DLLs updated to version 1.0.2h. https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20160503.txt
* New features
- New "socket = a:IPV6_V6ONLY=yes" option to only bind IPv6.
- Memory leak detection.
- Improved compatibility with the current OpenSSL 1.1.0-dev tree.
- Added/fixed Red Hat scripts (thx to Andrew Colin Kissa).
* Bugfixes
- Workaround for a WinCE sockets quirk (thx to Richard Kraemer).
- Fixed data alignment on 64-bit MSVC (thx to Yuris W. Auzins).
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.