SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
The main worry I have is that xserver is abandonware without even regular releases from the main branch. That's why we had to blacklist X. Without someone caring I think there's just largely downsides to enabling features.
Also there's zero technical reasons why modifiers are tied to atomic in -modesetting, at least as long as everything is disabled by default.
Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 10-25-2020 at 11:09 AM.
Wayland is linux only, and still not fully feature complete. Whether or not it's getting the due attention that it deserves Xserver is still needed.
Well, I thought that Slackware is a Linux distribution, or I miss something? What's the problem?
Regarding "features completion" you talk about what? You may want to say that the DEs may not ported entirely their features to Wayland.
As someone who literally uses daily the Wayland/Plasma5 I tell you that with the latest Plasma5, as in Plasma 5.20 and so on, there's a lack for only two DE features present on X11/Plasma5:
- remembering the windows position.
- restoring the previous opened windows after a reboot/logout.
Why? I believe that's not Wayland's business to do this. The Plasma5 should invent its own ways even for them.
However, I find funny that a bunch of security nuts ignores with elegance this Wayland, which looks magnitude grades more secure than X.org ...
Heck, the Plasma5 had to rely on Pipewire to screencast the opened windows for just doing thumbnails on taskbar!
Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 10-25-2020 at 12:37 PM.
I have a strange request: do you know the language called Euphoria?
It is a scripting language that shares many features of "serious" languages including (but not limited to):
Cooperative multitasking, functional programming, bit arithmetics, static typing, direct OS api access, memory management, modules, static linking, excellent loops with retry and continue, switch with fallthru, profiling, tracing, debugging, preprocessing, compile-time expressions, C translator and indirect function calls.
At the same time it has only four (!) built-in types and extensive standard library. I believe this language could be used to teach programming And it is a very small.
~$ eui --version
Euphoria Interpreter v4.1.0 development
64-bit Linux, Using System Memory
Revision Date: 2015-02-02 14:18:53, Id: 5861:57179171dbed
$ euc --version
Euphoria to C Translator v4.1.0 development
64-bit Linux, Using System Memory
Revision Date: 2015-02-02 14:18:53, Id: 5861:57179171dbed
so, including it should not be hard.
Language is not very popular, but tcl (which is a part of Slackware) is not very popular those says either.
Searched openeuphoria in repology.org, found only one Arch package in the AUR, nothing in pkgs.org so Slackware would be the first distribution to provide an official package. I am not the one who decides, but I suggest that you first contribute a package to https://slackbuilds.org.
PS and for teaching programming to little kids I suggest logo
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 10-25-2020 at 05:56 PM.
This is not a request, only a suggestion.
With the latest nfsutils seems some options in nfsmount.conf doesn't work(error: protocol not supported)
For example, if I enable port 4001
Code:
# Server Mountd port mountport
mountport=4001
then
Code:
mount -vvv slack64:public /mnt
mount.nfs: timeout set for Mon Oct 26 10:49:42 2020
mount.nfs: Unsupported nfs4 mount option(s) passed 'vers=4,retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,mountport=4001,port=2049,sec=sys'
mount.nfs: Unsupported nfs4 mount option(s) passed 'vers=4,retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,mountport=4001,port=2049,sec=sys'
mount.nfs: Unsupported nfs4 mount option(s) passed 'vers=4,retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,mountport=4001,port=2049,sec=sys'
when I remove mountport
Code:
mount -vvv slack64:public /mnt
mount.nfs: timeout set for Mon Oct 26 10:50:44 2020
mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,port=2049,sec=sys,vers=4.2,addr=192.168.0.2,clientaddr=192.168.0.2'
slack64:public on /mnt type nfs (rw,vers=4,retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,port=2049,sec=sys)
now i set mountproto
Code:
# Server Mountd Protocol
mountproto=tcp
another error
Code:
mount -vvv slack64:public /mnt
mount.nfs: timeout set for Mon Oct 26 10:52:42 2020
mount.nfs: Unsupported nfs4 mount option(s) passed 'vers=4,proto=tcp,retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,mountproto=tcp,port=2049,sec=sys'
mount.nfs: Unsupported nfs4 mount option(s) passed 'vers=4,proto=tcp,retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,mountproto=tcp,port=2049,sec=sys'
mount.nfs: Unsupported nfs4 mount option(s) passed 'vers=4,proto=tcp,retrans=2,retry=1,acl,ac,mountproto=tcp,port=2049,sec=sys'
mount.nfs: Protocol not supported
of course after remove mountproto works fine.
I think those options must be at least commented.
libbluray and libdvdcss are not equivalent software. The dvd equivalent to libbluray would be libdvdread and libdvdnav, both of which *are* included in -current.
The equivalent of libdvdcss would be libaacs and libbdplus, which are also absent.
libbluray and libdvdcss are not equivalent software. The dvd equivalent to libbluray would be libdvdread and libdvdnav, both of which *are* included in -current.
The equivalent of libdvdcss would be libaacs and libbdplus, which are also absent.
Ok oh, thats where my confusion stemmed from and why I thought it should be included.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.