SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I guess a lot of folks don't care much for documentation in info format nor the way one moves around in it, but ... although I am definitely more a vi than emacs person, I often use info within emacs to browse what has always seemed to be a wealth of material.
That said, I have long noted 'info' things that seemed to be missing on my Slack boxen & have wondered whether this was due to Slackware not including some files or simply due to, say, some kind of GNU weirdness.
On my -current laptop, if I fire up emacs and start the info system, then scroll down to the "Miscellaneous" category, there are a lot of entries followed by parentheticals that seem to indicate the tools in question are parts of larger collections / info files. Examples:
... thing is, if I try to open 'chroot,' emacs tells me
Info-find-file: Info file sh-utils does not exist
... and if I scroll up to the line
* Shell utilities: (sh-utils). GNU shell utilities.
... and click, I get the same thing. Same for textutils and fileutils ...
If you go to the Free Software directory at gnu.org, you'll find out that "Fileutils, Shellutils, and Textutils have been combined into the GNU Coreutils package. All further development and discussion is now taking place as Coreutils."
coreutils.info.gz is definitely in /usr/info.
I have futzed around in the /usr/info directory some, but I guess I am wondering why these outdated listings (for fileutils, etc) are still showing as they are in the info tree when info is invoked, and how to update that tree, make it accurate, etc.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.