I previously posted about more or less this same problem four months ago in the following thread:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...hreadid=312903
I am running Slackware 10.0 2.6.7 kernel. As stated previously I had attempted to use swaret to update my server. However, I'm not sure if I had this problem before then. I recently installed my 10.0 CDs on something else and Sendmail is doing the same thing.
I tried what was suggested and I've even gone as far as to reinstall all libraries from the Slackware 10.0 CD as well as build a new package of Sendmail 8.13.4 and installed it. Same issues. Along with the things I said in the Link above I now have the following things I've noticed or have been pointed out by my users. One has nothing to do with sendmail itself or atleast to my knowledge.
When an email faults or for whatever reason gets stuck in sending mode (which is what I posted about in my other thread as being the main problem) I get the following info in syslog:
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: <1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000026a
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: printing eip:
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: f9cea0ad
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: *pde = 00000000
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: Oops: 0000 [#601]
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: SMP
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: Modules linked in: fzvusm
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: CPU: 1
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: EIP: 0060:[<f9cea0ad>] Not tainted
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.7)
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: EIP is at ocultarProceso+0x5d/0xc0 [fzvusm]
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: eax: 0000004e ebx: c2354a88 ecx: c205a460 edx: 00000000
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: esi: 0000026a edi: c2354a68 ebp: 0000026a esp: e4bd8f70
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: Process write (pid: 28442, threadinfo=e4bd8000 task=f408cdd0)
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: Stack: 0000000d 00000000 00000018 00000078 f2386908 f238691b f9ce8b92 c2354ce8
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: f238691b 00000046 f2386858 f23868d8 00000001 f2386888 00000048 00000030
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: 00000003 0000000d 00000003 e4bd8000 c010401f 00000003 0804d6d8 00000400
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: Call Trace:
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: [<f9ce8b92>] modGetdents64+0x1a2/0x1b0 [fzvusm]
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: [<c010401f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel:
Aug 4 13:09:30 gator kernel: Code: ac ae 75 08 84 c0 75 f8 31 c0 eb 04 19 c0 0c 01 85 c0 75 d8
If I type sendmail -v to see the version (New issue) I get this stuff:
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: <1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000026a
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: printing eip:
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: f9cea0ad
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: *pde = 00000000
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: Oops: 0000 [#604]
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: SMP
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: Modules linked in: fzvusm
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: CPU: 0
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: EIP: 0060:[<f9cea0ad>] Not tainted
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.7)
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: EIP is at ocultarProceso+0x5d/0xc0 [fzvusm]
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: eax: 0000004e ebx: c2354a88 ecx: c205a460 edx: 00000000
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: esi: 0000026a edi: c2354a68 ebp: 0000026a esp: ee087f70
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: Process sendmail (pid: 29962, threadinfo=ee087000 task=f2089360)
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: Stack: 0000000d 00000000 00000018 00000078 d1786988 d178699b f9ce8b92 c2354ce8
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: d178699b 00000046 d17860d8 d1786958 00000001 d1786108 00000048 00000030
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: 00000003 0000000d 00000003 ee087000 c010401f 00000003 08129a48 00000400
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: Call Trace:
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: [<f9ce8b92>] modGetdents64+0x1a2/0x1b0 [fzvusm]
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: [<c010401f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel:
Aug 4 13:14:03 gator kernel: Code: ac ae 75 08 84 c0 75 f8 31 c0 eb 04 19 c0 0c 01 85 c0 75 d8
And lastly a user emailed me today saying that when he types the write command it also segfaults. If I as root do it it works, but not for normal users. Heres the syslog for that too.
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: <1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000026a
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: printing eip:
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: f9cea0ad
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: *pde = 00000000
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: Oops: 0000 [#603]
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: SMP
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: Modules linked in: fzvusm
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: CPU: 1
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: EIP: 0060:[<f9cea0ad>] Not tainted
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.7)
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: EIP is at ocultarProceso+0x5d/0xc0 [fzvusm]
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: eax: 0000004e ebx: c2354a88 ecx: c205a460 edx: 00000000
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: esi: 0000026a edi: c2354a68 ebp: 0000026a esp: d642ff70
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: Process write (pid: 28473, threadinfo=d642f000 task=cfb225c0)
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: Stack: 0000000d 00000000 00000018 00000078 c21cc388 c21cc39b f9ce8b92 c2354ce8
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: c21cc39b 00000046 c21cc558 c21cc358 00000001 c21cc588 00000048 00000030
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: 00000003 0000000d 00000003 d642f000 c010401f 00000003 0804d6d8 00000400
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: Call Trace:
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: [<f9ce8b92>] modGetdents64+0x1a2/0x1b0 [fzvusm]
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: [<c010401f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel:
Aug 4 13:09:36 gator kernel: Code: ac ae 75 08 84 c0 75 f8 31 c0 eb 04 19 c0 0c 01 85 c0 75 d8
I am now getting presure from admin in regards to the repeative email sends and what am I going to do about it. At this point I think the only other option I may have is to DL Slackware 10.1 and either redo eveything or attempt an upgrade that way which I'm trying not to do.
As always any thoughts or suggestions would be greatly appriciated.
Thanks.
-Smillie