SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Just the hfsplus for the iPod. Couldn't be bothered with converting the native filesystem.
I think, too, that the changelogs are a little misleading. If I am right, the changelog is only noting the changes since the last rc. If you don't install the rc releases, there are actually a lot more changes than the changelog notes. I could be wrong, but I swear that the changelog on the rc releases was much longer than these few entries.
(1) For kernel version designations, if the first number is the "major" number, the second is the "minor", and the third is the "release" number, what's the fourth number called? For example, in 2.6.11.12, what do we call the position that the "12" is in?
(2) In the changelog recently, I was amused to see PV delicately refer to these 2.6.11.x releases as "sucker kernels". Now I know PV is just a mere mortal (as underscored by the events of last winter), but I suppose his comment did make me less enthusiastic about compiling and installing every one of these 2.6.11.ad.infinitum jobs that shows up at www.kernel.org -- at least not without finding a compelling reason to do so.
I used to change the oil in my car a lot more frequently than I do now, too. And I also used to clean up my espresso machine after each use (now it looks like it belongs more in a gas station than in a yuppie's kitchen). I still try to tell my wife I love her at least once a day, though. Otherwise, she'd start getting jealous of all the time I spend with Slackware.
Originally posted by dhave A question and a comment on this topic:
(1) For kernel version designations, if the first number is the "major" number, the second is the "minor", and the third is the "release" number, what's the fourth number called? For example, in 2.6.11.12, what do we call the position that the "12" is in?
Since a recent change in the software kernel developers used to keep control of the kernel sources, they've started to make "smaller" releases, that's the 4th number. They're like beta versions in case you need a feature on them.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.