LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2005, 03:34 PM   #1
abefroman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: lost+found
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 1,430

Rep: Reputation: 55
Just installed slackware, but its hanging at boot


Just installed slackware, but its hanging at boot, it gives the errors:
/sbin/mingetty: relocation error: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
...repeated many times.....
INIT: Id "3" respawing too fast: disabled for 5 min
INIT: Id "5" respawing too fast: disabled for 5 min

How can I get this box to boot?

Thanks in advance.
 
Old 11-26-2005, 04:01 PM   #2
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
what does your /etc/inittab file look like??

did you do a full install or did you cherry-pick packages??
 
Old 11-26-2005, 04:39 PM   #3
abefroman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: lost+found
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 1,430

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 55
Quote:
Originally posted by win32sux
what does your /etc/inittab file look like??

did you do a full install or did you cherry-pick packages??
/etc/inittab looks normal, run level 3 by default.

I cherry picked.
 
Old 11-26-2005, 09:09 PM   #4
abefroman
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: lost+found
Distribution: CentOS
Posts: 1,430

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 55
It seems to work ok when I used a reiserfs instead of ext3, does anyone have slackware 10.1 running with an ext3 file system for the / partition?
 
Old 11-26-2005, 09:34 PM   #5
otchie1
Registered User
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 560

Rep: Reputation: 30
ahhh..iirc ext3 support is not included by default in the stock kernel. reiserfs is and so it works.
 
Old 11-26-2005, 09:48 PM   #6
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
Quote:
Originally posted by otchie1
ahhh..iirc ext3 support is not included by default in the stock kernel. reiserfs is and so it works.
of course ext3 support is included in 10.1's kernel, et al... otherwise it would be ridiculous to provide the ext3 option during install... take a look at the config file for 10.1 and you'll see: ftp://ftp.slackware.com/pub/slackwar.../bare.i/config
Quote:
CONFIG_EXT3_FS=y
abefroman, you did select to install the e2fsprogs package, right?? (just making sure)

Quote:
e2fsprogs: e2fsprogs
e2fsprogs:
e2fsprogs: Utilities needed to create and maintain ext2 and ext3 filesystems.
 
Old 11-27-2005, 07:41 PM   #7
otchie1
Registered User
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 560

Rep: Reputation: 30
I'll bow to your greater knowledge win32sux but I've definately been caught in that trap somewhere before now and I'm sure it was a Slack version.....yep, the more I think about it the more familiar it seems especially the 'respawning too fast' error message. And it was an fs disabled in the kernel...probably not 10.1 though so sorry for any confusion caused.
 
Old 11-28-2005, 08:53 AM   #8
maginotjr
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: BR - Floripa
Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10 - 2.6.x.x
Posts: 661

Rep: Reputation: 35
have you tried reinstalling Slack? Maybe some installation problem, something maybe get missed...
 
Old 02-05-2009, 03:24 PM   #9
openSauce
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Fedora, openSUSE
Posts: 252

Rep: Reputation: 39
Sorry to be bumping a 3-year-old thread, but I thought it worth adding that I just installed Slackware 12.1 and got the same error:

Code:
/sbin/mingetty: relocation error: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GL
IBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
When I reinstalled with ext2 instead of ext3 it worked. Possibly I could also have got it to work by selecting "format the root partition" during install, which I didn't do when trying ext3 as the partition already had an ext3 filesystem on it.

Edit: when I googled for the error, this thread was the only hit. It saved me a lot of time, hence me thinking it was worth bumping for anyone else! Hope that's ok.

Last edited by openSauce; 02-05-2009 at 03:26 PM.
 
Old 02-05-2009, 03:29 PM   #10
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by openSauce View Post
Sorry to be bumping a 3-year-old thread, but I thought it worth adding that I just installed Slackware 12.1 and got the same error:

Code:
/sbin/mingetty: relocation error: /lib/i686/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GL
IBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference
When I reinstalled with ext2 instead of ext3 it worked. Possibly I could also have got it to work by selecting "format the root partition" during install, which I didn't do when trying ext3 as the partition already had an ext3 filesystem on it.

Edit: when I googled for the error, this thread was the only hit. It saved me a lot of time, hence me thinking it was worth bumping for anyone else! Hope that's ok.
Seems like the first you installed Slackware 12.1 on top of anotehr distro (/lib/i686/libc.so.6 is not a Slackware file) and that messed up your resulting installation bigtime. Recipe for disaster.

No reason to revive this stinking old thread. You should have been more careful in the first place.

Eric
 
Old 02-05-2009, 05:09 PM   #11
openSauce
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Fedora, openSUSE
Posts: 252

Rep: Reputation: 39
Being an ass doesn't help anyone learn anything. This, however, did:
Quote:
Seems like the first you installed Slackware 12.1 on top of anotehr distro (/lib/i686/libc.so.6 is not a Slackware file)
so thanks
 
Old 02-05-2009, 05:21 PM   #12
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Of course I sprinkle the sweet and the sour into the same dish. It should have learnt you that libraries in different distros (or even in different Slackware releases) are not safe to mix. This is also the reason for the much-heard advice not to install individual packages from one Slackware release onto another Slackware release. Most often this results in breakage.

If you think I was an ass I am fine with that; you are entitled to your own opinion. But I would say there is a lot for you to learn still.

Eric
 
Old 02-05-2009, 05:30 PM   #13
win32sux
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380Reputation: 380
Okay guys all this talk about asses isn't gonna help anyone.

Please knock it off and let this thread die (again).
 
Old 02-05-2009, 06:39 PM   #14
unSpawn
Moderator
 
Registered: May 2001
Posts: 29,415
Blog Entries: 55

Rep: Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600Reputation: 3600
Thanks for showing a constructive attitude by posting additional information. Necroposting (posting in threads left stale for 4 months or more) is frowned upon. That should however not give any LQ member the excuse to point that out in impolite terms. Next time I suggest creating your own thread and posting a link to the original thread. Being closed, this thread is now.

Last edited by unSpawn; 02-05-2009 at 06:40 PM.
 
  


Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual boot windows/slackware, but slackware installed first? Cryptic_K Slackware 3 11-20-2006 12:49 PM
Slackware "hanging" on boot Rakka Linux - Newbie 1 10-08-2004 06:58 PM
Who installed Slackware 10 and boot into X with ease? subaruwrx Slackware 8 07-24-2004 05:25 AM
Just installed Slackware 10.0 boot ? grim_chel Linux - Newbie 4 06-29-2004 12:11 PM
Slackware 9 installed fine, but does not boot sbayeta Slackware 9 05-12-2003 12:04 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration