SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I do not have any performance insight as I didn't build that kernel (yet). Anyway I assume that YMMV depending on your hardware and settings.
If by "special hint" you meant "to reuse the config files from 3.2.28", really nothing special. As a reminder copy the "old" config file as /usr/src/linux-3.2.29/.config then run "make oldconfig", that's about it. If need be this will tell you more.
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 09-12-2012 at 05:02 AM.
Pat always adopted a new kernel when was released and I don`t think we need to test this kernel too long. It`s a LTS kernel and with every release it has fewer and fewer bugs.
For the same branch, just reuse one of the config files in /boot.
Anyway there will be probably several kernel releases in the 3.2.x branch before the release of Slackware-next-after-14 and you will have to do that if you want to install one of these.
I doubt 3.2.29 will end up in /testing as it makes no sense; 3.4.x DOES belong there, however. I give it 50/50 Pat will upgrade to 3.2.29: he wrote the above quoted message back on the 24th, and I'm sure he had no idea we would still be pre-release in mid-September...
Speaking of which, perhaps a .rc5 along with 3.2.29 would be prudent, considering all the other changes?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.