LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-29-2010, 01:41 PM   #1
Jack128
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 Current
Posts: 90

Rep: Reputation: 22
Heavy Instability on x86_64 Current


Hello,
I have a very frustrating stability problem on my Workstation
where I run a Slackware64 Current installation. The problem is,
many programs just crashes, after they started, or after a quit
short while. Affected are Firefox, Thunderbird, Krusader, Amarok,
Konsole, and many other programs. The second problem is, if I
downloaded a bzip2 archive, it is corrupt. I downloaded many
archives, from other mirrors, and all corrupt.

I had installed, the Multilib-packages, thought they would be
the reason for the problems, and installed the standard packages
of glibc and gcc. No changes. Then I upgraded the kernel from
2.6.33.4, to 2.6.35.6. (Compiled it myself) Nothing better.

Here is a strange dmesg-output:
Code:
xsane[9734]: segfault at 7f8b6d93e974 ip 00007f8b694a57eb sp 00007fff096a2f90 error 4 in ld-2.11.1.so[7f8b6949c000+20000]
I've installed slackware64 with my pxe-server, but if I formatted
a partition with ext4, many packages could not be installed, he
says they were corrupt. But if I formatted the partition to ext3
everything could be installed, without errors.

Attached are some crash-logs, from KDE, maybe they could help.

Please help me, thank you for any advice.
Best regards, Jack.
Attached Files
File Type: txt akregator-20100929-173600.txt (3.4 KB, 9 views)
File Type: txt amarok-20100929-165706.txt (8.8 KB, 8 views)
File Type: txt konsole-20100929-165559.txt (1.3 KB, 16 views)

Last edited by Jack128; 09-29-2010 at 01:43 PM.
 
Old 09-29-2010, 01:59 PM   #2
ponce
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Pisa, Italy
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,098

Rep: Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175Reputation: 4175
I would try a memtest on the machine: maybe the easiest way to run it is from an ubuntu livecd (it's between the boot options).
 
Old 09-29-2010, 02:26 PM   #3
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Most probable is a bad RAM - in the higher regions.
Does that computer have 4GB or more of RAM installed? If you ran a 32-bit OS before and never experienced problems, then the bad RAM may be in the part which can not be addressed by the 32-bit OS.

Eric
 
Old 09-29-2010, 02:32 PM   #4
Darth Vader
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247Reputation: 1247
@Jack128: limit the accessed memory on installer and system boot and see if everything is OK. You can run a x86_64 system even with a 512M memory, right?

EDIT>

mem=bytes

e.g., mem=4000000

This option specifies to the kernel the highest memory address to use (specified in bytes). Normally Linux uses all of the available memory. This feature can be useful for simulating machines with less memory or debugging cache problems on machines with lots of memory. As an experiment, try booting your machine with less memory, say 2MB, to highlight the difference memory makes. As another experiment, see what happens if you lie and tell Linux you have more memory than is installed...

Last edited by Darth Vader; 09-29-2010 at 02:34 PM.
 
Old 09-29-2010, 02:36 PM   #5
Jack128
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 Current
Posts: 90

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 22
The system have 6GB RAM installed, witch is relative new.
Not 4 months ago. But I run the memtest this night, I never
thought of that. Thank you all for your fast replies, and
your advices =)
 
Old 09-30-2010, 03:39 AM   #6
Martinezio
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 32
To access more, than 4GB of RAM, You need to build Your own kernel with "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support" enabled (sorry, I don't know, what options are used with default slackware kernel, because I'm using my own kernel since first installation of my system <Slack 12.0> and I've blacklisted kernel packages in slackpkg config file :> ). IMHO this should resolve Your problems. Be sure also to use SLUB alocator instead SLAB. It's better in smp arch - I'm using it for a long time and have no issues

And the most important - be sure, if You don't have any 3rd party software installed! If You can, do fresh install of Slackware64.

If You encounter more instabilities, so please - check Your RAM with memtest twice, or more...

Good luck
 
Old 09-30-2010, 06:11 AM   #7
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martinezio View Post
To access more, than 4GB of RAM, You need to build Your own kernel with "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support" enabled
You do not have to build a new kernel in Slackware64 if your computer has more than 4GB of RAM. The 64-bit Slackware can use a lot more than 4 GB out of the box.

Eric
 
Old 09-30-2010, 07:03 AM   #8
Martinezio
Member
 
Registered: May 2009
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 191

Rep: Reputation: 32
Thx Eric for correction - I'm not interested with the kernel packages from slackware since I'm doing it myself

So, the problems are definitly involved with one of two things:
- physical memory corruption (or incompatibilies within different memory chips),
- 3rd party software.

There is no other possibility, in my opinion.
 
Old 09-30-2010, 11:37 PM   #9
Jack128
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 Current
Posts: 90

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 22
Thank you all, I have run long tests on each
module. One of my G.Skill module, have many
defect blocks. After I removed it, everything
works fine.

Thanks for your fast advice. =)
Best Regards, Jack.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] libpng clash in kopete and kmess - slackware current x86_64 trumpet_tom Slackware 7 03-28-2010 02:59 PM
gnuplot in 32bit current is x86_64 ivandi Slackware 1 03-04-2010 01:52 PM
Have you been running slackware-current for the first time for x86_64? If so . . . foodown Slackware 19 08-20-2009 12:06 AM
Slackware-current (x86_64) Xorg crash chaosorama Slackware 3 08-01-2009 02:09 AM
FC11 X86_64 occasional instability terry-duell Fedora 1 06-22-2009 07:18 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration