LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


View Poll Results: What's your 2nd favourite OS?
Arch Linux 25 6.56%
Gentoo Linux 30 7.87%
Debian Linux 42 11.02%
*buntu Linux 45 11.81%
SuSE Linux 32 8.40%
Fedora Core Linux 14 3.67%
Linux (OTHER) 31 8.14%
FreeBSD 40 10.50%
NetBSD 5 1.31%
OpenBSD 15 3.94%
BSD (other) 3 0.79%
Windows 56 14.70%
Other (which?) 43 11.29%
Voters: 381. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2006, 12:11 PM   #151
introuble
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Debian -unstable
Posts: 700

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31

Quote:
then i decided not to use it because i will not install Windows beside it
I'm sorry, what? I don't understand the reason in any way.
 
Old 08-11-2006, 12:15 PM   #152
ahmed gamal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Egypt
Distribution: slackware + XP
Posts: 591

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by introuble
I'm sorry, what? I don't understand the reason in any way.
what i want to say that Windos is important form me
and it is in my primary partition
and BSD needs to be installed in primary partition too
so where can i install BSD
 
Old 08-11-2006, 12:25 PM   #153
raska
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Aguascalientes, AGS. Mexico.
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 kernel 2.6.29.6
Posts: 816

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahmed gamal
...
and BSD needs to be installed in primary partition too
so where can i install BSD
You can have up to 4 primary partitions in a disk (talking about MS-DOS type partitions)
or you can combine them with up to 1 extended partition which can host a lot of logical partitions.

I don't know for BSD properly, but if an operative system can boot only from a primary partition (i.e. not from a logical partition), it has lost any respect from me.

Here, some reading about partitions, can get you started.
 
Old 08-11-2006, 12:31 PM   #154
ahmed gamal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Egypt
Distribution: slackware + XP
Posts: 591

Rep: Reputation: 30
thank you about the link
but i can't repartition my drives because i have a lot of important data on my disk
what i want to ask for : does windows work on a disk that contains 4 primary partitions
 
Old 08-11-2006, 12:36 PM   #155
raska
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Aguascalientes, AGS. Mexico.
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 kernel 2.6.29.6
Posts: 816

Rep: Reputation: 31
Yes it does.
You can have different operative systems in each partitions, and should not overlap themselves in any way.
Say, as an example: One windows xp, one Slackware and one BSD should be in 3 different primary partitions, and you can have one extended partition with a bunch of little logical partitions, maybe at least one for swap and other(s) to shared data between systems.

Though as the prices go down everyday, currently is quite easier to buy another hard disk to mess up with it.
 
Old 08-11-2006, 12:45 PM   #156
Heimskringla
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Distribution: Slackware (-current - 2.6.16.20)
Posts: 16

Rep: Reputation: 0
For linux distros I like Ubuntu followed by Knoppix.

I do use Windows XP (Professional) now and again, because some websites require IE, and I find virtual machines are a bit of a PITA to configure. XP lives on a ~4gb partition and gets booted on average of once every couple months.
 
Old 08-11-2006, 03:35 PM   #157
MannyNix
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: ~
Distribution: Slackware -current
Posts: 465

Rep: Reputation: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by introuble
FreeBSD is a great Operating System. I have ran it in the past exclusively for large periods of time. Due to unfortunate events I had to give it up [for now] and settle with Linux. FreeBSD is really not hard to use but it does have it's gotcha's. Lucky the FreeBSD Handbook is probably the best piece of documentation I've ever read.
I agree 100%, care to say about those unfortunate events?
However i found that running FreeBSD is not as fun as Slackware, i have to use linux emulation for tons of apps and i somehow feel tied to ports and their dependencies, my but, as i said, i agree with you.

Anybody around here has tried crux? Care to post a comment? After reading this review
i feel like giving it another test run, my fav part is this :
Quote:
Crux is like a good looking, really good looking, gorgeous, hot girl without any cheap perfume or makeup, waiting for you to customize her in any way you see fit. On top of that, she is free, permanent and wont make absurd and disturbing demands.

Last edited by MannyNix; 08-11-2006 at 03:52 PM.
 
Old 08-13-2006, 09:29 PM   #158
vharishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 3,178
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 138Reputation: 138
The FreeBSD handbook is a great lifesaver and I like the way how it's easy to set up hardware in FreeBSD as compared to Linux which sometimes involves kernel recompiling.
 
Old 08-14-2006, 07:34 AM   #159
x0as
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Debian Sid/Lenny
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Only other OS I use is debain, I wouldn't say either debian or slackware if my favourite. I prefer debian as a desktop and server os and slackware for development.

I liked using gentoo but got fed up of the long compile times.
 
Old 08-14-2006, 08:36 AM   #160
Youri
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Distribution: slamd64-current, slackware-current, clfs 6.1, arch-current, ubuntu dapper
Posts: 144

Rep: Reputation: 15
i voted arch but also lfs these 3 os's share a 1st place
 
Old 08-15-2006, 10:25 PM   #161
Worksman
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Romania
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 171
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 31
ArchLinux because it seems the next in order, stable, fast (i686), free of thousands of ugly patches (the reason I hate Gentoo) distribution.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, otherwise cheers!
 
Old 08-17-2006, 07:14 AM   #162
Ali Kazmi 2040
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Pakistan,Rawalpindi
Distribution: Slackware 10.0, KDE 3.4
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Have been using slackware for some time now. Recently tried my hands on Suse too and liked it to an extent (the only problem being its over-simplified nature), but its a really nice distro.
 
Old 08-17-2006, 07:32 AM   #163
Worksman
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Romania
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 171
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 31
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ali Kazmi 2040
Have been using slackware for some time now. Recently tried my hands on Suse too and liked it to an extent (the only problem being its over-simplified nature), but its a really nice distro.
I hate those type of distro's! Like Ubuntu, very hard to customize! It's like you got your hands tied.
 
Old 08-17-2006, 08:21 AM   #164
fireedo
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Indonesia,Sidoarjo
Posts: 342

Rep: Reputation: 30
Yes I think I'm a slackware fans because everytime I try to install and use other distro I always come back to slackware eventhough other distro give me a lot of easy configuration or something but then I feel boring.....
I think I need a distro that not to easy to configure but not to hard and I found it in Slackware
about my second OS it will be windows....cant deny it because sometimes I cant find a replacement software for somethings that only work on windows
but Slackware is my main OS
 
Old 08-17-2006, 02:46 PM   #165
Worksman
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Romania
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian, Arch Linux, Gentoo, Slackware
Posts: 171
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by fireedo
Yes I think I'm a slackware fans because everytime I try to install and use other distro I always come back to slackware eventhough other distro give me a lot of easy configuration or something but then I feel boring.....
I think I need a distro that not to easy to configure but not to hard and I found it in Slackware [...]
Exactly the same here! I always came back to Slack ^_^ though I think ArchLinux could keep me entertained (not getting me bored because it's so easy), in fact I feel like moving to Arch again because I can't remember what it did to me last time that made me install Gentoo/Slackware... just kidding! ^^
I'm with Slackware! No matter what, I always get back to it.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dual booting slackware and 2nd distro stevielawson Slackware 5 01-09-2006 11:47 PM
Slackware 2nd.CD prob. 777JR Slackware 5 12-04-2003 09:32 PM
Do i really need the 2nd CD of Slackware 9.1 ? GloVe Slackware 7 09-30-2003 03:24 PM
Which is your fav strider_D_3000 Linux - Newbie 2 07-31-2003 01:58 AM
Install 2nd drive for Slackware? rurbaniak Linux - Newbie 1 02-13-2002 08:34 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration