SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I reached mine some time ago. The silver lining in this thread has been some of the good tangential posts.
Agreed. I didn't ignore the thread, just ialexand. FWIW adding him brings my ignore count to only 4 total in over 10 years on LQN. Not too shabby.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fido_dogstoyevsky
There seem to be more Slackware trolls just now - or, I've forgotten to wear my foil helmet.
Well there is more internet churn with the (well deserved) hubub over Slackware v15 but some people consider saying something good about something they don't use as being tantamount to attack on what they use so I suppose the more childish of them feel the need to lash out..
Comparing complexity of Xfce with KDE5 is a little bit silly.
Minimal working xfce is about 15 packages. What about minimal KDE5? How many? 200? 300? Does minimal KDE even exist?
I wasn't comparing the complexity of them (and I wasn't even comparing Plasma5 to XFCE, it was with lxqt), but rather that the heavy lifting to get them ready for Slackware is done by people other than Pat. Alien Bob handles both Plasma5 and lxqt... rworkman handles XFCE.
Can you please try to start comprehending what I write in my posts rather than reading a few words and coming to the wrong assumption of what I wrote?
Well there is more internet churn with the (well deserved) hubub over Slackware v15 but some people consider saying something good about something they don't use as being tantamount to attack on what they use so I suppose the more childish of them feel the need to lash out..
It's possible that he's trying to socialize
It does not necessarily do it well, but in the current times, the intention is commendable
I wasn't comparing the complexity of them (and I wasn't even comparing Plasma5 to XFCE, it was with lxqt), but rather that the heavy lifting to get them ready for Slackware is done by people other than Pat. Alien Bob handles both Plasma5 and lxqt... rworkman handles XFCE.
Can you please try to start comprehending what I write in my posts rather than reading a few words and coming to the wrong assumption of what I wrote?
Your posts have null meanings. You just keep repeating things.
Did you know how many nights I spent trying to solve what in the end was probably ONE PERCENT from this build system of Plasma5?
I lost my nights for YEARS! Now, let me enjoy what I fighten for!
You come here to argument that Plasma5 shall be removed, because there's NOT also Gnome3?
Did you know WHY there's NO Gnome3? Simply: NO ONE cared about it.
You care about Gnome3? Feel free to spend your time packing it! Go and work, you arrogant!
Now let me to enjoy with serenity the Plasma5, you ignorant full of arrogance!
And for your knowledge: the KDE is called the company which produces the software. The proper name of the software is Plasma5.
I don't care GNOME and KDE (Plasma or Хуязма, call it as you want) equally. You don't get my point at all. Looks like all your intellect was lost on Plasma nights.
I don't care GNOME and KDE (Plasma or Хуязма, call it as you want) equally.
What? You may want to say Плазма-хуязма eventually. Which means in English something like "Plasma flow"
Quote:
Originally Posted by ialexand
You don't get my point at all.
I got well your point that you have no clue about what you talk, specially that there was people, starting mainly with Mr. Hameleers, who struggled for years to create a build system for Plasma5 which combines simplicity of usage with a best packaging for Slackware.
And that you even have no clue how Slackware is packaged.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ialexand
Looks like all your intellect was lost on Plasma nights.
Yet another demonstration of your arrogance...
You believe that your intelligence is highly superior of mine - and everybody else here.
BUT, until now, those claims are just words - then arrogance.
Please demonstrate your superior intelligence with acts, like yours own SUPER-BUILD for Gnome3 or whatever.
Go to work!
Last edited by LuckyCyborg; 04-10-2021 at 07:55 PM.
Did you know how many nights I spent trying to solve what in the end was probably ONE PERCENT from this build system of Plasma5?
I lost my nights for YEARS! Now, let me enjoy what I fighten for!
Tough luck. Looks like you have suffered a severe malfunction of your logic circuits. We are talking about this Plasma, not that Plasma. The Plasma we are talking about is quite easy to compile. Even if you shovel in all the useless garbage it only increases the compile time, not the complexity.
I am going to jump in again, equating Plasma5 to GNOME when it was still included in Slackware is dubious at best. I do not recall what version Slackware last shipped with GNOME, I know it was prior, but even the last iteration of Slackware that shipped with GNOME, it was rather broken - so Pat did the logical thing and dropped it. KDE5 a.k.a Plasma5, is not like GNOME, it has been implemented by AlienBob rather well, and Pat adopted it - and nothing suggests that the iteration of Plasma5 to be broken as GNOME was; when it was last included i.e. options not working, or outright errors when having Plasma5 launched. GNOME had this, errors on startup, and some features were broken.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.