LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
At this point we have no plans to change the setup in this regard. As with almost everything on LQ, you can feel free to continue the discussion in this thread. If something compelling/convincing is posted, I'll certainly reconsider.
Is does get irritating to accidently click on a banner and get a new page, but that's life in the big city.
If someone slams into me while driving, is it the paint manufacturers fault? No. While it maybe true that if I paint my vehicle neon pink, the other driver may have seen it, but it's their driving that caused the problem. In the same vein, if you don't know how to control your browsers behavior while clicking links, is it the authors fault? No.
If someone slams into me while driving, is it the paint manufacturers fault? No. (...) Learn to use the tool correctly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonaskoelker
To which there's a perfectly reasonable answer, and that's "learn how your browser works".
I absolutely agree: people should know how to use their tools correctly.
However, I'm not on about LQ making people use their browsers incorrectly, I'm on about LQ making opening certain links in the current pane a lot slower (in most browsers) which only making opening links in a new pane a bit faster (again in most browsers). The only ways to work around this is by changing LQ or by changing the relevant browsers.
The entire target attribute has been removed from XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.1. This leads me to think that there is a larger agreement somewhere that target="_blank" should not be necessary.
The entire target attribute has been removed from XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.1. This leads me to think that there is a larger agreement somewhere that target="_blank" should not be necessary.
Sonneteer,
You're right about that "target=_blank" is deprecated in Strict versions of XHTML, but the reason is not that it's not a good idea to pop open a new window, but more to encourage separation of the content from activity of the page. Just like using CSS for layout and style separates presentation from content. If using XHTML other than Transitional, you can simply use Javascript like <a onclick="window.open('yoururlhere.com');" href="#"> This is the link </a> to open the new window and your code will still validate.
For max effectiveness, use unobtrusive javascript. See Jeremy Keith's DOM Scripting for more info.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.