LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback
User Name
Password
LQ Suggestions & Feedback Do you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2006, 09:27 PM   #16
jonaskoelker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Denmark
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 1,524

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy
The logic I described is only for the user generated part of the site (ie. posts).
Okay. Should I interpret your silence regarding the non-user generated part as "it works as I think it should and I'm not going to change it"?
 
Old 06-18-2006, 10:25 PM   #17
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602

Rep: Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084Reputation: 4084
At this point we have no plans to change the setup in this regard. As with almost everything on LQ, you can feel free to continue the discussion in this thread. If something compelling/convincing is posted, I'll certainly reconsider.

--jeremy
 
Old 06-24-2006, 01:42 PM   #18
cwwilson721
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: In my house.
Distribution: Ubuntu 10.10 64bit, Slackware 13.1 64-bit
Posts: 2,649
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 67
I find the default behavior perfectly acceptable.

Is does get irritating to accidently click on a banner and get a new page, but that's life in the big city.

If someone slams into me while driving, is it the paint manufacturers fault? No. While it maybe true that if I paint my vehicle neon pink, the other driver may have seen it, but it's their driving that caused the problem. In the same vein, if you don't know how to control your browsers behavior while clicking links, is it the authors fault? No.

Learn to use the tool correctly.
 
Old 06-28-2006, 10:45 AM   #19
jonaskoelker
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Denmark
Distribution: Ubuntu, Debian
Posts: 1,524

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 47
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwwilson721
If someone slams into me while driving, is it the paint manufacturers fault? No. (...) Learn to use the tool correctly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonaskoelker
To which there's a perfectly reasonable answer, and that's "learn how your browser works".
I absolutely agree: people should know how to use their tools correctly.

However, I'm not on about LQ making people use their browsers incorrectly, I'm on about LQ making opening certain links in the current pane a lot slower (in most browsers) which only making opening links in a new pane a bit faster (again in most browsers). The only ways to work around this is by changing LQ or by changing the relevant browsers.

just-clarifying-that-you're-not-addressing-my-point-'ly yours,

not Tim Peters
 
Old 06-28-2006, 05:04 PM   #20
Sonneteer
Member
 
Registered: May 2006
Location: Canada
Distribution: Slackware 13.37; Ubuntu 12.04
Posts: 81
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 15
The entire target attribute has been removed from XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.1. This leads me to think that there is a larger agreement somewhere that target="_blank" should not be necessary.

Here are a few links of note:
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
Top Ten Web Design Mistakes of 1999
 
Old 06-28-2006, 07:13 PM   #21
sewmyheadon
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Distribution: Zenwalk, Ubuntu Server
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonneteer
The entire target attribute has been removed from XHTML 1.0 Strict and XHTML 1.1. This leads me to think that there is a larger agreement somewhere that target="_blank" should not be necessary.
Sonneteer,

You're right about that "target=_blank" is deprecated in Strict versions of XHTML, but the reason is not that it's not a good idea to pop open a new window, but more to encourage separation of the content from activity of the page. Just like using CSS for layout and style separates presentation from content. If using XHTML other than Transitional, you can simply use Javascript like <a onclick="window.open('yoururlhere.com');" href="#"> This is the link </a> to open the new window and your code will still validate.

For max effectiveness, use unobtrusive javascript. See Jeremy Keith's DOM Scripting for more info.

domscripting.com

 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can I run a port scan to a "target" machine from the internet? NuxIT Linux - Networking 9 05-18-2006 06:20 AM
Help with Installation. "No rule to make target.." Aries311 Linux - Software 2 07-02-2005 03:47 PM
"iptables: No chain/target/match by that name" error PennyroyalFrog Linux - Security 2 11-28-2004 01:57 PM
Apache "TARGET=" option not working kev_dude Linux - General 0 03-15-2004 01:07 AM
what means "no rules to build the target"? captainstorm Programming 4 07-03-2003 09:26 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > LQ Suggestions & Feedback

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration