LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I'll continue to monitor both threads closely, so if you've already made a suggestion or comment in this thread there's no need to make it over there as well. If you feel my initial high level overview is missing anything or can be improved, let me know.
* Members in the "New Member" group will not be able to use the reputation system. Once a member makes a single post and is in the "Member" group, they will be able to use the system.
I actually didn't want to take that new thread off the zero reply list so I am posting here;
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Original Poster
Rep:
What *exactly* do you not understand. Those statements are clearly not contradictory, and NOTHING HAS CHANGED. After a single post a member can use the system but they will not give off rep (what is said in what you quoted). After a certain number of posts they can use the system and will give off rep (what is said in the linked post).
NOTE: I've moved your post, as after saying you weren't going to move the new thread off the 0 reply list, you did.
(Edit - in response to @anishakaul, not @Jeremy!) Not necessarily. If you join and make no posts, you are in the "New Member" group. If you make one post, you join the "Member" group. These groups are specific to LQ's vBulletin implementation and do not reflect the member titles that we all have.
What Jeremy is saying is that if you are a recent member of LQ and have a low number of posts, that weights your rep at a lower rate than a long standing/high posting member would have.
So for a member who has been here a month and made 4 posts, they can only give out low rep. If a member has been here for years and made 4000 posts, the rep they give will be higher.
AFAIK "clicking the "yes" on a helpful post" and thus adding to the repute points of the helper is considered to be using the reputation system.
The above quote of Post 498, states a new person needs to join the "member" group to "use the repute system". To join the "member" group a newbie requires 30 posts !!
and you said :
Quote:
The number of posts is quite low and is actually identical to the number needed to use the old Thanks system.
30 posts is "quite low" . Alright. Things are clear now.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Original Poster
Rep:
anishakaul - NO, that's incorrect...for reasons that I have explained multiple times now and that Ray reiterated directly above your post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by XavierP
If you join and make no posts, you are in the "New Member" group. If you make one post, you join the "Member" group. These groups do not reflect the member titles that we all have.
anishakaul - NO, that's incorrect...for reasons that I have explained multiple times now and that Ray reiterated directly above your post:
I have been following this thread for quite a while now, I faintly remember you saying some thing like that in the *former* thread !
But still when you say "member", I tend to take it on the face value, since i could not find any FAQ where you mentioned your *internal* representation of status of the members. May be I have missed it !
And I could not see XaveirP's post since I was typing the above post that time !
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.