LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
When I click the link button in the editor, it already says "http://" in it. It might be convenient if you're writing the URL by hand, but for me it's just annoying and in the way when I copy and paste a URL into it.
I just wonder what other members think about this problem (and if there are members who find the feature helpful rather than in the way), and if it's worth modifying it to just show an empty text box?
I always copy the links in, and therefore I have to delete the given http:// in the box. For me, an empty box would be more convenient.
I always copy the links in, and therefore I have to delete the given http:// in the box. For me, an empty box would be more convenient.
For me it is useless but NOT annoying because when you click insert link icon, the text http:// appears ALREADY selected, so when I paste the url on it, whatever is written there gets automatically overwritten, the problem can occur if you place a cursor in it and then try to paste something, because then the text is no longer selected so can't get overwritten automatically!
Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 01-18-2011 at 09:34 PM.
and typing [code] manually would not have been all that onerous, if you had to use them only in some exceptional cases, but that's not the case, the code tags are not only used in the programming section, but also in the Newbies/Linux-general/Linux-kernel, extensively, not for posting the code but for posting the command outputs!
For me it is useless but NOT annoying because when you click insert link icon, the text http:// appears ALREADY selected, so when I paste the url on it, whatever is written there gets automatically overwritten, the problem can occur if you place a cursor in it and then try to paste something, because then the text is no longer selected so can't get overwritten automatically!
That works, if you copy and paste with Ctrl+C/V, but not if you just mark the URL and paste it with a middle click of your mouse. But anyways, you are right, it is selected, so one tap to the Del-key is enough to get rid of it.
For me Ctrl-C Ctrl-V is much more easier than middle clicking the mouse but perhaps that's just me. My mouse doesn't move properly, it needs an effort to set it at the desired location!
Last edited by Aquarius_Girl; 01-19-2011 at 04:13 AM.
I open the site I want to give a link to (many bookmarks here) and double click the URL in the address-bar, so that it is marked. I am so used to this and then middle click with the mouse that I almost go weird if I have to work at a Windows system. Windows just doesn't support this function, which is used in Linux at least till I use Linux, but I think long before that time.
"marked" == "highlighted" (?"highlit"?)
In addition to double click, & in some cases triple click, click & drag, as well as click - move - shift+click, will do this.
If your mouse moves easily, it gives you a 2nd text buffer -- very convenient. In fact, it is the lack of this feature that is the worst inconvenience when I am forced to use a "Winders" box for some quick task. I am amused that something so small is such an aggravation. That just shows how much I use this feature, & how 2nd nature it is to me.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.