LQ Suggestions & FeedbackDo you have a suggestion for this site or an idea that will make the site better? This forum is for you.
PLEASE READ THIS FORUM - Information and status updates will also be posted here.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Is there no way to automatically lock threads after X days from the last activity? I know nothing of how hard or easy this would be to implement. Just seems like an obviously helpful feature? Would save the mods some time as well I would think in not having to shut them down manually?
Last edited by jmgibson1981; 05-04-2021 at 09:11 AM.
Distribution: Currently: OpenMandriva. Previously: openSUSE, PCLinuxOS, CentOS, among others over the years.
Posts: 3,881
Rep:
I'm sure it could be done/implemented, and can think of no reason why it couldn't be done. But of course this has been suggested dozensoftimesalready. So I doubt Jeremy will do it this time, since he seems very much against it.
Personally I think a reasonable compromise would be to close threads that are at least 10 years old that HAVE had replies, and not close threads on the Zero Reply List or something similar.
That new example appears to be a spammer. Regardless of the age of the thread, or if they create their own, a spammer is going to post. The cleanup work is the same.
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 13,602
Rep:
This has been discussed before and is not something we plan to implement. Additionally, can we reserve "spammer" to obvious mass spammers and not a new member that likely had good intentions and didn't immediately understand the norms of LQ?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.