Linux - Software This forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum. |
Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
|
 |
01-07-2006, 05:24 PM
|
#1
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 42
Rep:
|
which can run linux os run better on my old computer
right now my old computer run suse linux os but it runs slows so i want to try someother linux that can run on my computer faster
this is my computer info
CPU:333mhz
RAM: 198(i think}
hard drive: 1 10g(this is where i will install os) 2 9g(this is my back up)
CDrom: 8x dvd/cd
CDrom: 52x
USB 1.0 (2 port)
video card: built in motherbord 8M
if you need more info about my computer then just ask me
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 05:33 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Distribution: Gentoo Unstable
Posts: 51
Rep:
|
Gentoo linux installs packages from source, hence they are optimised for the machine they are built on, so there could be a possible performance enchancement (at the cost of taking longer to install)
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 05:39 PM
|
#3
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 13
Rep:
|
What you should do is find a distro with a lightweight desktop environment, such as XFCE. Both KDE and GNOME will be far too demanding for your hardware. I personally use Arch Linux, but if you're looking for something easy to install, I believe that Mandriva 2006 comes with XFCE as an option.
Quote:
Originally Posted by generic_genus
Gentoo linux installs packages from source, hence they are optimised for the machine they are built on, so there could be a possible performance enchancement (at the cost of taking longer to install)
|
Not only does Gentoo take ages to install, it takes ages to do package upgrades. All this for a negligable performance increase. Also, compiling on a 333MHz machine will take an eternity.
Last edited by scottlc; 01-07-2006 at 05:42 PM.
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 05:42 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Sebec, ME, USA
Distribution: Debian Etch, Windows XP Home, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,445
Rep:
|
I'm running a minimal debian install(read No GUI) on a 166Mhz w/ 196MB ram. You might be able to run a small gui(fluxbox,icewm) w/ relative speed. It won't look pretty, but it'll work. If you're used to the pop-up menu in KDE(what SuSe uses), try icewm.
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 06:04 PM
|
#5
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 42
Original Poster
Rep:
|
i will try mandriva but do you think red hat can run fine on my computer?
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 06:24 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Sebec, ME, USA
Distribution: Debian Etch, Windows XP Home, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,445
Rep:
|
You're going to find the same thing happens in Mandrive. Both Mandriva and SuSe use KDE, which tends to use more CPU power.
|
|
|
01-07-2006, 09:30 PM
|
#7
|
LQ Guru
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: Fedora, CentOS, Debian
Posts: 16,298
Rep:
|
You need to use a light window manager with those kind of specs. Any distro will run, but some better than others e.g. Slackware, Vector Linux etc.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 07:51 PM
|
#8
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Minneap USA
Distribution: Debian, Mepis, Sidux
Posts: 470
Rep:
|
dude, try DamnSmallLinux 2.2. its simple, sweet, and fast on my p2/233 laptop w 64mb ram. some pointers on how to best install it (I think!):
1. boot live CD; start a terminal
2. sudo cfdisk [enter]
3. make any partitions that you want. save and exit.
4. right-click mouse: menu, apps, tools, install to hard disk.
5. reboot
6. right click mouse: menu, apps, tools, enable gnu tools
7. right click mouse: menu, apps, tools, enable apt
8. terminal
su [enter]
(password) [enter]
vi /etc/apt/sources.list [enter]
9. (hope you know how to use vi! otherwise any text editor can be started from the su command line)
change to:
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ stable main non-free contrib
(save and exit)
10. still in terminal, still su:
vi /etc/apt/preferences
change the number from 100000 to 300000 (just swap the "1" for a "3")
(save and exit)
11. in terminal (as su):
apt-get update [enter]
apt-get install synaptic [enter]
(answer the questions as default, let it install...)
exit [enter]
exit [enter]
Now you should be ready to roll for most of what you'll want to do. DSL has many small packages ready prepared for it in the "myDSL" installer, but make sure that you save them to a safe directory (/home). otherwise, from the tools menu, you can use the (much-better) synaptic to install a lot of things.
try to stay away from the packages that might mess with X or anything video-changing related.
This whole install works in at about 512mb of space i'd bet, and it can be amazing.
Last edited by lefty.crupps; 02-09-2006 at 11:49 PM.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:09 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
You can run suse or mandriva with KDE on such a machine, but you need to trim the fat. no artsd, no unecessary services, get rid of gui eyecandy, jpg desktops, filemanager file previews, etc and it runs quite well without having to go to a limitted wm...
But if you do go to a light wm on mandriva or suse, then it will run even quicker, but with less features... So it's a choice...
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:14 PM
|
#10
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Minneap USA
Distribution: Debian, Mepis, Sidux
Posts: 470
Rep:
|
i don't know if fluxbox (on dsl) is a "limited window manager" at all. one just needs to know how to tweek it.
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:41 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Distribution: Mandriva/Slack - KDE
Posts: 1,672
Rep:
|
I don't personally mind blackbox or windowmaker or ice or whatever, but for a linux newbie they are certainly limitted...
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 PM.
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|