What programs would you like to see ported to Linux?
Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Other than a complete OS, there are virtual app creators. They convert just one app into a lightweight VM. These are some examples: http://carlcheo.com/portable-app-creators. It is not THE example I was looking for, but for the life of it I cannot remember the name. More research might be useful.
if this is what i think it is, i definitely have to check it out.
will any of these apps work on linux?
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels
Virtualbox can share a drive from your host OS with Windows. It shows up as a mapped drive.
Other than a complete OS, there are virtual app creators. They convert just one app into a lightweight VM. These are some examples: http://carlcheo.com/portable-app-creators. It is not THE example I was looking for, but for the life of it I cannot remember the name. More research might be useful.
jlinkels
That's what I meant about how files are shared between the two -- I might be wrong but I can't see Windows playing nicely with a workflow necessitating the use of a separate drive for certain parts of the workflow.
As to the containerisation type thing -- how on earth do M$ structure the license to cope with that eventuality? Would each instance be another license to pay, would one have to call M$ every time an application was installed to confirm one owned a key?
OK, I'm being a bit awkward but my point it VMs ave their own issues to work out.
Distribution: Debian /Jessie/Stretch/Sid, Linux Mint DE
Posts: 5,195
Rep:
Like I write in my post to lax luthier, you should consider Windows in a VM exactly as another laptop standing next to you.
That doesn't solve any problem you mention (shared drives, licensing), but a VM doesn't make them worse either.
Personally, I do not use any Windows app which requires a serious workflow. Just things like VMWare client and some programs to interface with hardware devices. Although with the latter the file sharing demon (not daemon!) pops up when I need the images or data files.
For real work like the creation of things, documents, programs, artwork, technical design I don't need and don't want Windows applications. Unfortunately this doesn't fly when you have to share with co-workers.
What I cannot understand is why Windows users in general refuse (or are reluctant at least) to use FOSS like Inkscape or Gimp and prefer licensed software. I can understand they do not want to use LibreOffice, but there are also multiplatform alternatives.
While reading through the latest posts of this thread the thought crossed my mind that we should open another thread: which Linux programs you like to see ported to Windows. Which is nonsense of course because most programs are available in Windows. But it shows the discrepancy. Linux programs are very usable, but seldom preferred in Windows.
Having taken a brief look at the sort of thing Photo Page plus does, it seems as though I could do as much or more using Libre Office draw.
However if you want to doi photo post-processing before making a coll;age page, you will need to do that in GIMP.
Both Libre office and Gimp are open source and cross platform (meaning you can have them coexist on a Windows system, or you can have them in many Linux distros, minus the cost of having a windows license, and all legally.
However you will have to do some added learning. the capabilirties of both these applications is very extensive, and though you can get started fairly easily, the worthwhileness of all is in biting th bullet on the self-learning commitment, much as I have done for some 50 years or more in multiple subjects and 3 languages.
Versatility and complexity always go hand in hand - how much do you want and are you ready, willing and able to do the self-learning <<au fur et a mesure >> (or, in ongoing and dynamic proportion).
Quote:
Originally Posted by jlinkels
Like I write in my post to lax luthier, you should consider Windows in a VM exactly as another laptop standing next to you.
That doesn't solve any problem you mention (shared drives, licensing), but a VM doesn't make them worse either.
Personally, I do not use any Windows app which requires a serious workflow. Just things like VMWare client and some programs to interface with hardware devices. Although with the latter the file sharing demon (not daemon!) pops up when I need the images or data files.
For real work like the creation of things, documents, programs, artwork, technical design I don't need and don't want Windows applications. Unfortunately this doesn't fly when you have to share with co-workers.
What I cannot understand is why Windows users in general refuse (or are reluctant at least) to use FOSS like Inkscape or Gimp and prefer licensed software. I can understand they do not want to use LibreOffice, but there are also multiplatform alternatives.
While reading through the latest posts of this thread the thought crossed my mind that we should open another thread: which Linux programs you like to see ported to Windows. Which is nonsense of course because most programs are available in Windows. But it shows the discrepancy. Linux programs are very usable, but seldom preferred in Windows.
VMWare had a wonderful way of running a Windows Virtual Machine in a 'headless' mode, which basically meant that you could launch any installed program (from the virtual machine) from a menu, and it would launch that program, but not the whole desktop. Sadly, they have retired that feature. It would be great if either VirtualBox or VMWare had something like it. Unfortunately, it was built for Unity, though I had it working in other DMs.
Neither of them (VMWare or Virtualbox) are any good if you want any heavy graphics programs running (games etc.), as the graphics drivers are not really very good for 3D, and MANY programs that use DirectX or OpenGL fail to load.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexpaton
VMWare had a wonderful way of running a Windows Virtual Machine in a 'headless' mode, which basically meant that you could launch any installed program (from the virtual machine) from a menu, and it would launch that program, but not the whole desktop. Sadly, they have retired that feature. It would be great if either VirtualBox or VMWare had something like it. Unfortunately, it was built for Unity, though I had it working in other DMs.
Neither of them (VMWare or Virtualbox) are any good if you want any heavy graphics programs running (games etc.), as the graphics drivers are not really very good for 3D, and MANY programs that use DirectX or OpenGL fail to load.
VirtualBox the used to have a "seemless mode" like that but I'm not sure whether it's still there or not.
Having taken a brief look at the sort of thing Photo Page plus does, it seems as though I could do as much or more using Libre Office draw.
However if you want to doi photo post-processing before making a coll;age page, you will need to do that in GIMP.
Both Libre office and Gimp are open source and cross platform (meaning you can have them coexist on a Windows system, or you can have them in many Linux distros, minus the cost of having a windows license, and all legally.
However you will have to do some added learning. the capabilirties of both these applications is very extensive, and though you can get started fairly easily, the worthwhileness of all is in biting th bullet on the self-learning commitment, much as I have done for some 50 years or more in multiple subjects and 3 languages.
Versatility and complexity always go hand in hand - how much do you want and are you ready, willing and able to do the self-learning <<au fur et a mesure >> (or, in ongoing and dynamic proportion).
Your post is a bit mixed up there:-
PagePlus is a Desktop Publisher with very advanced processing. Scribus and LibreOffice Draw/Writer don't come close. It was at the budget end of the market, but blew Microsoft Publisher away. It was also a very good PDF editor (which Libreoffice only really does in Draw, badly).
It has since been replaced by Affinity Designer.
PhotoPlus is a photo editor, and can almost certainly be replaced 99% with The Gimp, and the other 1% are probably features that few people use. In fact, most people could probably do what they need in Pinta, with almost no learning curve.
DrawPlus is a Vector drawing program. It is like a usable version of CorelDraw/Illustrator. The closest thing I have come across in Linux is XaraLX, which unfortunately is no longer working in Ubuntu. XaraLX was also the closest thing to PagePlus, in functionality, though it didn't really get close. Krita would be a very decent replacement, though in my experience, it is one of the least stable (and therefore, most frustrating) linux programs to use.
This has also been replaced by Affinity Designer.
Your post is a bit mixed up there:-
PagePlus is a Desktop Publisher with very advanced processing. Scribus and LibreOffice Draw/Writer don't come close. It was at the budget end of the market, but blew Microsoft Publisher away. It was also a very good PDF editor (which Libreoffice only really does in Draw, badly).
It has since been replaced by Affinity Designer.
PhotoPlus is a photo editor, and can almost certainly be replaced 99% with The Gimp, and the other 1% are probably features that few people use. In fact, most people could probably do what they need in Pinta, with almost no learning curve.
DrawPlus is a Vector drawing program. It is like a usable version of CorelDraw/Illustrator. The closest thing I have come across in Linux is XaraLX, which unfortunately is no longer working in Ubuntu. XaraLX was also the closest thing to PagePlus, in functionality, though it didn't really get close. Krita would be a very decent replacement, though in my experience, it is one of the least stable (and therefore, most frustrating) linux programs to use.
This has also been replaced by Affinity Designer.
Peoples' evaluations of software and more often is coloured or biased by what is superficially convenient to them. However my approach is more to get into the underpinnings abnd make a limited number of open source apps do far more than they end up doing for most, however I do not write code or compile code. I am an advanced user, but not a software developer.
Nonetheless, I create various template like applications in Libre office, Gimp, Audacity and the like, and also have started to tinker with Pitivi.
The same bias is true for what I do, but by going deeper into the apps I do use, I open the door for getting even more versatility out of them, with less learning cosmetics.
It is turned off. The next time you start it, it is there as before.
You turn it off and start it up as a normal computer.
Yes
That is on the low side. 8 GB would be better.
Think of a virtual machine as another laptop standing next to your normal computer. You can install, uninstall, put it to sleep, wake it up, turn it off and on, format your hard disk, configure your screen. The only difference is, it is not a real hardware laptop, but something which emulates your laptop's hardware. And shares the same processor resources.
There is no mixup between the processes, memory, disks between your host machine and your guest machine. Totally separate. The farthest you can go in sharing is to make a shared drive in one of your machines and access it like you access a drive over the network.
jlinkels
What excellent, exacting answers! Thanks so much. I did try researching the process of setting up said virtual windows machine. It seemed complex and in my hands potentially disastrous. I'm not much of a software geek, rather an experienced hardware maven. But when I can upgrade to 8 Gbyte I will "vow to endeavor to persevere".
VirtualBox the used to have a "seemless mode" like that but I'm not sure whether it's still there or not.
Seamless mode was never quite as complete as Unity mode. In Unity mode, you could add a menu to several linux DMs, to launch individual programs from the virtual machine.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexpaton
Seamless mode was never quite as complete as Unity mode. In Unity mode, you could add a menu to several linux DMs, to launch individual programs from the virtual machine.
I'd not realised that couldn't be done with seamless mode, if I'm honest. Not something I've found the need for beyond playing around a little. I can see how it could be useful but it would confuse me trying to recall which VM was running which application and where it stored the outputs.
Peoples' evaluations of software and more often is coloured or biased by what is superficially convenient to them. However my approach is more to get into the underpinnings abnd make a limited number of open source apps do far more than they end up doing for most, however I do not write code or compile code. I am an advanced user, but not a software developer.
Nonetheless, I create various template like applications in Libre office, Gimp, Audacity and the like, and also have started to tinker with Pitivi.
The same bias is true for what I do, but by going deeper into the apps I do use, I open the door for getting even more versatility out of them, with less learning cosmetics.
That is true, for much of my Linux usage. Video editing in particular, I find I use several different programs to arrive at an end result. Aside from editing any text in a text editor, and preparing images, it is difficult to do the same kind of processes in desktop publishing, particularly for things like brochures.
I tend to work on the principal, that if it is a job that I only do occasionally, I need a GUI, rather than having to re-learn how to do things every time.
When talking about the Serif products (particularly PagePlus and DrawPlus), I have spoken to them about it on several occasions, since they say that their developers have versions of their software running on WINE. I have stated to them that I would happily pay for a Linux version. They have now replaced it with Affinity Designer, which I would happily pay for as well; Bizarrely, they have made the effort to produce a MAC version now, which presumably means that they have changed their processes somewhat, but they have still not made a Linux version.
I even wrote them a VERY long email about Agile program development, with resource links and an article link about how it could benefit them, as they could develop 95% of their code for all platforms, and then develop the 5% for individual platforms. Unfortunately, their public email address did not exist and the email bounced.
I would have thought that the budget software arena (i.e. 49 dollars, euros or pounds) is an area that Linux users would pay, for VERY good productivity software.
This thread is for letting vendors know that there is interest in porting one of their programs to Linux. Let us know what programs you would like to see ported and why. Details such as how much you would be willing to pay may be helpful as well. If there is enough interest for certain programs I will even contact the vendor myself.
--jeremy
I would love to see Evernote ported to linux.
I am using nixnote as a work around - but I find the sync is not absolute and is not 100 compatible.
I am subscribing to evernote for 25 annually - but would gladly pay $5 or (maybe) $10 more annually to have access to this on linux.
I wonder if there is a way for the nixnote folks and evernote to work closer together to accomplish this goal.
Something like MS Access (as it was 20 years ago), which would enable end users to create desktop database applications without having to be a real developer. Kexi, LibreOfficeBase and Lazarus might be the nearest equivalent on linux, but, sadly, all of them far from comparable in terms of stability and/or ease of use.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.