Linux - SoftwareThis forum is for Software issues.
Having a problem installing a new program? Want to know which application is best for the job? Post your question in this forum.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just switched Windows to RedHat 9 from Windows XP. I've been a Linux fan, though not always a user for a long time. I switched a little hastily, as I'm a web designer, and rely on my tools to build my sites.
Anyone know of a good program to run Windows programs under Linux 9? All the suggestions I have gotten were wrong. Wine won't work with GLIB 2.3, and I gotta get back up and running.
a) It's "Red Hat Linux 9", not "Linux 9", that's too vague
b) It's glibc, note the C on the end, glib is something totally different.
c) Wine does work with Redhat 9, use the RPMs from newrpms.sunsite.dk and you're going.
Alternatively use CodeWeavers Crossover. Remember not everything runs in Wine. You'd be better off using native programs, they will work better. I find XEmacs to be good.
Eh, actually if you look at my post again, it says REDHAT LINUX 9. I only shortened it later for want of repeating myself over and over. I guess it's cool if you have nothing better to do than nit-pick other peoples posts.
Sorry if you took it personally, I've not seen "Linux 9" used as a shortened form before (as that could refer to at least 3 different things). Redhat 9 is the usual form, or RH9 if people are feeling really lazy.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.